Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Cantor Takes Obama to Task for Imperial Presidency


VERBATIM

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor has produced an 8,000-word report assailing President Barack Obama for instituting an imperial presidency.

Even The New York Times noted recently on its front page “an increasingly deliberate pattern by the administration to circumvent lawmakers,” Cantor writes.

Pieces appearing over the course of the past several months in The Washington Post, National Review, and The Wall Street Journal have talked about his "imperial presidency."

The Obama administration’s lack of respect for the law is hampering economic growth and individual prosperity, particularly the jobs market, he says.

“Property rights and rule of law are essential for the proper and efficient functioning of society and the economy,” Cantor states.

“When ‘laws’ are created without going through Congress; when laws are selectively executed; when an administration intervenes into the normal judicial process and diminishes an individual's property rights; and when the normal regulatory process is circumvented, the rule of law is eroded.”

That’s exactly what has happened under Obama, Cantor says.

“While administrations of both political parties have been known to test the bounds of the limits of their power, the breadth of the breakdown in the rule of law in recent years has reached new levels,” he writes.

Cantor’s report cites more than 40 examples of the White House’s lack of respect for the law.

This includes:

• Ignoring Advise & Consent, such as through recess appointments;

• Creating laws outside of the Congressional process, such as changing the unionization process, telling businesses where they are allowed to locate, imposing propaganda mandates on employers, telling federal contractors who they have to hire, regulation of hydraulic fracturing, establishing a national ocean regulatory policy, creating a new land regulation program, global warming regulations, network neutrality regulations, auto efficiency mandate, claiming the power to define what constitutes religious employment, draconian regulation of coal;

• Ignoring the Plain Letter of the Law & Failing to Faithfully Execute the Law, such as waiving work requirements under welfare; the contraception mandate and the rights of religious employers, expansion of the refundable tax credit providing for premium assistance, Medicare Advantage quality bonus demonstration, medical loss ratio requirement for health insurers, termination of Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository, rewriting bankruptcy law, failing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, recognition of Jerusalem, lobbying for abortion overseas, halting the airport screening partnership program, expedited airport screening for members of the Armed Forces, DREAM Act deferred action, administrative amnesty for illegal immigrants, withholding critical information about counterfeit goods, Medicare Solvency Requirements;

• Circumventing the Normal Regulatory Process, such as abuse of sue and settle tactics, re-write of coal regulations, abuse of guidance documents, refusing to disclose regulatory agenda, failing to list essential health benefits, Gulf drilling moratorium; banning uranium mining in Arizona;

• Government By Waiver, such as education policy by waiver and healthcare law waivers;

• Creating New Programs Not Authorized by Congress, such as the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, new “super” agencies, the healthcare Independent Payment Advisory Board, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

“There is no excuse for this continuous disregard of legislative authority and the Constitutionally-required separation of powers,” Cantor writes.

“This is no way to govern. The President has set a precedent that even his supporters should find troubling. . . . The Founding Fathers wisely gave the President many powers, but making law was not one of them.”


© 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

7 comments:

  1. The House has the authority to impeach, no? Cantor's party is in the majority, no?

    Though I agree with what he says... He can put up or shut up. No one in either the House or the Senate is doing, or has done, anything about the criminal in the White House. And they won't.

    It's election year talk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. It's not like Obama has JUST started doing this, it's been his M.O. from the start.

      Delete
  2. Though I agree with what he says... He can put up or shut up. No one in either the House or the Senate is doing, or has done, anything about the criminal in the White House. And they won't.

    It's election year talk.

    You are 100% correct, unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's a reverberation from the last time the Republicans thought they had a Democratic President caught red handed seriously misbehaving in the White House. They paid a severe political price for doing something they thought was right, and they won't try an impeachment again until the evidence is beyond dispute. I think it definitely is now, but then I'm not in power. Another curse from the Clinton administration.

    ReplyDelete
  4. obama has done a shitty job since day one. The only positive that I can think of to come out of this administration is the fact that he allowed the military to kill bin Laden. Beyond that his administration has been an abject failure. I hope that The People are smart enough to fire him on November 6th. Even that is questionable since the American people don't set their standards very high for their president. He is a street punk. No more, no less.

    ReplyDelete
  5. He is a street punk. No more, no less.

    And a full fledged Communist.

    ReplyDelete