Friday, January 25, 2013

Dem Rep: Women should serve in combat, but shouldn’t use assault weapons

Via NC Links

 

Another brilliant statement from a gun expert........

On the very same day that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta lifted the ban on women serving in active combat zones, a Democratic congresswoman from New York argued that assault weapons are actually difficult for women to handle and should therefore be banned.

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy — a strong proponent for women serving in military combat roles — appeared on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight Thursday to make the case for Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s assault weapons ban.  To that end, McCarthy argued that women should use traditional rifles rather than assault rifles because the former would would be “easier for a woman” to use. 

More @ The Blaze

17 comments:

  1. McCarthy's view of women in combat:

    A marine rifle platoon engages Taliban in Kandahar province. The automatic riflemen cut lose. The riflemen pick their targets. A woman in the first squad's second fireteam begins yelling. She falls silent after a while.
    What is your malfunction,marine? the PSGT demands.
    I don't know the Pashto word for dumbass, Sergeant.
    Unacceptable! You never leave the FOB without your local dictionary of harsh language! And you call yourself a Marine!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whut ! ?, That may not be the stupidest thing out of a Libtards mouth , but it's got to be in the top ten. If they are not carrying hardware as good or better than the enemy , what does she expect them to do , scratch their eyes out ?. That only defeats a determined enemy in a San Fransisco Bar fight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I bet she thinks that a M-16 is harder to handle than a M1 or M14. Damn if I know, but would like to ask her.

      Delete
    2. Just read it a again and she thinks they should use a rifle instead of an assault weapon!:) Silly me, I thought a M16 was a rifle, at least that's what my drill SGT drummed into my head. This is my rifle, this is my gun.........:)

      Delete
  3. What is a traditional rifle? Going to give 5'1'' 120 female an M-14 maybe a Garand? What about a BAR? Traditional rifle 03 Sprinfield?, 94 Winchester? Singleshot .410 full choke of course for the extra range. God these liberals act like 5.56 is a .300 win mag or even a Lapua. That one jackass said Ar's fire such a huge rnd it would shred the deer to the point of being uneatable! Either these retards know NOTHING about guns or THEY have some Super MEGA POWERFULL 5.56 rnd we know nothing about!???

    China
    III

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That one jackass said Ar's fire such a huge rnd it would shred the deer to the point of being uneatable!

      Now that's rich!

      Delete
  4. "...this is for killing, this is for fun" :)


    I wonder if McCarthy realizes how stupid she sounds?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The "Bimbo BAR brigade"... Ok you wimmin carry these BARs here 'cause this hear M4 is just to terry-fiing for ya....... Oh My god!!! Only in Con-Gress land

    ReplyDelete
  6. The AR platform is 50 years old. How long does a technology have to be around before it's considered "traditional"? The M-1 carbine is decades older than the AR, and under Frankenfinestien's bill it too will be outlawed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'd rather be under fire with some women shooters I know beside me than in Congress with this maroon, or quite a few other female politicians of the HR Clinton ilk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I heard you were palling around with Feinstein.........:)

      Delete
  8. Clearly, they will be better off just using the "shoulder thing that goes up".

    ReplyDelete