Friday, October 30, 2015

EXCLUSIVE — Donald Trump Rights Ship on Immigration: Demands Disney Rehire Workers Replaced by Cheap Foreign Labor, Calls Rubio ‘Silicon Valley’s Puppet’

Via avordvet

 US-VOTE-REPUBLICANS-DEBATE

Last night during the CNBC primary debate, Donald Trump, who to this point in the campaign had been the Republican candidate most closely aligned with the conservative grassroots on immigration policy, seemed to have altered his message in several significant ways.

Breitbart News documented some of these changes here.

Trump, who leads many national 2016 polls, granted Breitbart News an interview on the subject. Full questions and responses below:

BNN: The media has been filled with stories about companies flying in low-wage H-1B workers to replace American workers in tech jobs. Adding insult to injury, these American workers have been forced to train their replacements. If you were President, would you put a stop to this practice?

DT: Day one. This is why I got into this race. Because the everyday working person in this country is getting screwed. 

More @ Breitbart

Andrew Young: Sees the Confederate battle flag as the cross of St. Andrew

Via Billy

 

Civil rights veteran Andrew Young says the Confederate battle flag is a symbol whose controversy is overblown by those opposing its presence in public places.

"To hell with where we fly it," Young snorted in response to a question during an interview with 11Alive News.

The former Atlanta mayor and UN ambassador says that when he sees the Confederate battle flag, he sees the cross of St. Andrew, a figure of Christianity.

"The cross itself is a symbol of redemption and reconciliation. And just because a few people used it for other purposes…we don't need to jump to emotional conclusions," Young said.

More with video @ 11 Alive

Current US Military

Comment by Anonymous on Changing the “Macho” Male Culture of the US Milita...

http://media.hamptonroads.com/cache/files/images/1167351.jpg
To any one considering either enlisting or becoming an officer in ANY branch of the military today, I have only one thing to say to you: DON'T.

To those still in the military: Do NOT re-up.

To the officers: Resign your commission. The life and soul you save will be your own.
The civilian leadership in charge does not have the slightest clue. They hold you in contempt. They WILL screw you over.

TPTB, will get their way and get their gender neutral less masculine military. It is a done deal. They will also get you killed for no good reason. As much as it pains me to say this (I am a 27 year vet) just maybe, this country is so far gone down the tubes that it is NOT worth defending any more. I see the average citizen as a sheeple, and clueless.
To those who voted for antichrist Obama, you are the enemy. You are NOT my countryman, you are the other. I don't give a damn about you. I wish for you the worst fate of all, to have to live with the consequences of your own stupidity. I pray that you will get in full measure every thing that you deserve. Zero sympathy.
Again from Kipling: "If any question why we died, tell them because our fathers lied."

***************************
 
http://k18.kn3.net/taringa/1/5/8/5/5/0/83/hbtflorez/156.jpg?4634


Changing the “Macho” Male Culture of the US Military

Via WRSA

 https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/female-soldiers.jpg

I remember hearing in 2010 from a buddy at the Pentagon that the combat exclusion policy for women in combat arms would be overturned no matter what “about a year from the President’s last year.” At the time I thought he was crazy, but the next year I heard the same from another friend. His take was even more troubling: “There is a loosely connected group of advocates that have found huge traction with the current civilian leadership here and they have a pretty well-thought out campaign plan to get women into combat arms,” he told me. “Some of the groups simply want equality, others talk about more women generals, and there’s one group that is linking this to changing American male culture.” Looking back, many of the things I am seeing now make sense when remembering my friends’ comments.

Today I am privy to most of the plans that are currently in place to put women into combat arms. I have been told, again by acquaintances working at the Pentagon and at various headquarters around the US military, that all of the “experiments” that the services have been undergoing for some time now have been a sideshow. The decision had been made from the get-go. As one Female Engagement Team Program manager told many in Afghanistan in 2011, “the decision has already been made; we just need to talk about “the how” instead of “if”.”

This means that the Ranger School “experiment” was an experiment in name only. It was guaranteed from the beginning to graduate a woman and that graduation would be used as proof that the combat exclusion rule needed to go. This, of course, matches what every Army Command Sergeant Major (9) in 2011-2013 told me was said to them by high-level CSMs and General Officers while attending their pre-command courses: “women will be in combat arms and women will graduate Ranger School, if any of you has a problem with that, you need to get out of the military.” They reported that the Ranger Instructors at Ranger School were told the same thing.