Saturday, December 12, 2015

Climate Change Draft Agreement Calls for US to Transfer Wealth to Developing Countries

Via Billy

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ0AwcUR8tDoCPpNlP9-_ZSKzRcpdXzgM-rg4J9sGcN76H23Q2K3ogn7EK3v6fmDsIDCzhL86DHEOPSNkEYqUnkJiDzk1KYtxQwJIE5o6Bks66KFivakdou6w9niX9OURwEO1xQ3neD4o/s1600/Kerry+as+Herman.jpg

The draft of the international agreement to deal with climate change, which is being considered today in Paris by representatives from 195 countries, calls for the developed nations of the world (which include the United States) to transfer wealth to developing nations, including through “public funds.”

More @ CNS

Attorney General Loretta Lynch's Muslim Terrorist Connections

Via Billy

Lynch-600-LI

Attorney General Loretta Lynch recently said that the Department of (IN)Justice would stand with Muslims in the wake of the San Bernardino jihad attacks and stated unequivocally, "When we talk about the First Amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted." But beyond the fact that she has engaged in unconstitutional criminal activity, Lynch was also a part of a Jew-hating, Pro- Muslim Terrorist Harvard Group.

Discover the Networks informs us that Loretta Lynch was born in Greensboro, North Carolina (So Lynch is not African-American, she's American, at least by birth. Having dark skin does not make you African. My friend Andre De Villiers, who makes custom knives, is from Africa and is as white as can be!), Lynch "earned an A.B. from Harvard College, where she was an original member of Delta Sigma Theta, a newly formed African-American sorority chapter; another noteworthy original member was Sharon Malone, who subsequently went on to marry Eric Holder."

More @ Eagle Rising

Lunatic Obama: “Prejudice (Not Global Warming?) Helps ISIS”

Via Billy

isis global

ISIS has now spread its network to 17 countries – not counting its sleeper cells in the West.

Obama blames prejudice.

In his latest Weekly Address Barack Obama tells Americans prejudice helps ISIS proving once again he is complete lunatic.
As I said in my speech last weekend, one of the most important things we can do is to stay true to who we are as Americans.
Terrorists like ISIL are trying to divide us along lines of religion and background. That’s how they stoke fear. That’s how they recruit. And just as Muslims around the world have to keep rejecting any twisted interpretation of Islam, all of us have to reject bigotry—in all of its forms. I’ll say it again, prejudice and discrimination helps ISIL and it undermines our national security.
More with video @ The Gateway Pundit

Syrians Arrested in Swiss Terror Plot – Were Transporting TOXIC GAS for Geneva Attack

Via Billy

Geneva ISIS suspects Le Matin Twitter 

Swiss authorities said Saturday that two people of Syrian origin had been arrested on suspicion of transporting “explosives and toxic gases” as part of a probe into a terror threat.

 The two suspects arrested Friday are accused of the “manufacture, concealment and transport of explosives and toxic gases”, the federal prosecutor’s office said in a statement.

 They are also under suspicion of violating Swiss law prohibiting “groups like Al-Qaeda, Islamic State and similar organisations”, it added.

 Several Swiss media reported Friday that two people had been arrested in the Geneva region and that traces of explosives were found in their car, as the western city remained on alert due to an increased jihadist threat.

 Geneva’s public prosecutor has announced a news conference for later Saturday.

Donald Trump: Hillary Says I’m Dangerous When “She’s Caused So Many Deaths”

Via Billy


Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump argued that Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is “the one that caused so many deaths and everything with her horrible policies on Saturday’s “Fox & Friends” on the Fox News Channel.

Trump said, “She was on one of the shows the other night and she was talking about Donald Trump talks very rough. he may be dangerous. Dangerous? She’s the one that caused so many deaths and everything with her horrible policies. You look at what’s gone on in Libya. You look at — and I’m not just mentioning Benghazi, which was a disaster in itself, but you look at so many of the decisions that she made that were so bad, so horrible, and honestly caused tremendous havoc and tremendous death. So, she’s the one that’s really got to justify her record that’s horrible.”

Why Are We Taking in Refugees with the True Unemployment Rate 23%?

Via comment by Quartermain on The eyes have it




The controversy over Donald Trump’s call for a halt to taking in Muslim refugees until they can be adequately vetted brings to mind the question: Why is the U.S. even taking in refugees? Apart from the terrorist dangers surrounding the vetting issues, we certainly no longer have the resources to take in refugees or any new immigrants. Yes, it’s altruistic to welcome newcomers, according to the MSM, the establishment politicians, and the “We care so much” liberals, if you have the ability to take care of them or a job for them. But the reality is, the U.S. cannot take care of its own citizens, much less take care of everyone who wants to come here, whether legally or illegally. 

Donald Trump Isn't the Problem. Trump Derangement Syndrome Is.

Via comment by Quartermain on An Establishment Unhinged


 http://www.971talk.com/sites/g/files/exi366/f/article-images-featured/497881-475071.png

My Facebook feed is inundated with indignant Republicans excoriating Donald Trump for his comments about Muslim immigrants. 

This has been a recurring theme since Trump announced his candidacy last spring: Republicans who don't like Trump express outrage over Trump's off-color or problematic remarks and spend the next six news cycles distancing themselves from Trump.

What Trump's Republican detractors don't realize is that their Trump Derangement Syndrome is playing directly into the left's hands.  That's because the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign, overwhelmed by the Islamic terrorist threat whose name they lack the moral courage to even utter, use the GOP's vociferous condemnation of Trump to distract Americans from the Democrats' abject failures.

German TV channel films ISIL slave trade in Turkey

Via Billy

German TV channel films ISIL slave trade in Turkey

Dated

German television station ARD has produced footage documenting the slave trade being conducted by the radical terrorist group the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) through a liaison office in Turkey.

Two correspondents from the TV channel filmed a Yazidi family buying their relatives to save them from ISIL and spoke to witnesses. The Yazidi family contacted a liaison office of ISIL in Turkey through a Kurdish man named Abu Mital, who works as an intermediary for ISIL, in order to purchase a mother, her three children and an 11-year-old boy from ISIL and return them to their family.

In the video, Mital is seen contacting ISIL militants on the Internet, bargaining with them and setting a price for the sale of the woman and the children. Mital then went to the southeastern Turkish province of Gaziantep, where he received information via WhatsApp about the name of the person to whom he had to give money and the address of the ISIL liaison office.

Lincoln’s System of Controlling Elections



It was said that in early 1864 Lincoln feared for his reelection — in February Bremen diplomat Rudolf Schleiden mentioned in a dispatch to his country that Lincoln said to Judge Thomas, of Massachusetts, that he would be satisfied if his successor was elected from the Republican Party. If that did not take place the President feared that he would spend the rest of his life in jail for repeated violations of the Constitution.”
Bernhard Thuersam, www.Circa1865.com   The Great American Political Divide

Lincoln’s System of Controlling Elections

“After the presidential election of 1864 Lincoln wanted to contend that his plans [for reconstruction] and proceedings had received a mandate from the people. But the voters had had no opportunity to choose between the two Republican positions. After the Wade-Davis Manifesto, Davis – a malignant and ambitious man, said a Wisconsin paper – and a handful of anti-Lincoln Radicals met in convention and nominated John C. Fremont for the presidency on a completely Abolitionist-Radical platform.

The Fremont candidacy brought confusion and concern in the Lincoln camp [and might] throw the election to Democrat George B. McClellan [and the Radicals] recognized the necessity for a united front and deserted Fremont. The Union League clubs poured out Lincoln pamphlets and rallied to the President. Eventually Lincoln made a bargain with the Fremont supporters and the Radical candidate reluctantly withdrew from the contest.

The contest in 1864 was between Lincoln and McClellan . . . Perhaps, if the Democrats had nominated their ablest man, Horatio Seymour, the question of executive power and Lincoln’s rotten boroughs in the South might have been debated on the hustings.

Although the election of 1864 gave no decision on the methods of reconstruction, it proved again Lincoln’s power to control elections. The system of arbitrary arrests, military control of polling places, and soldier voting, first applied in the Border States and then extended into the North, had saved the Republican party in 1862 and 1863. The election of 1864 saw a new extension of the system and demonstrated its continuing value in winning elections.

In September, with the adjustment of thee Fremont aberration and with a successful new draft into the army going off without riot and disturbance . . . Then, in October came elections in Indiana and Pennsylvania, and it became evident that the system that had won in Ohio the year before was still useful.

In Indiana, Governor Oliver P. Morton, efficient and aggressive, was running for re-election. His adjutant-general harried the Democrats during the campaign; an agent-provocateur enrolled Democrats in a secret society and then turned the names over to Morton; and on the eve of the election Morton flamboyantly arrested a handful of ratty conspirators, whom he charged with treason.

[Morton] used the situation as an excuse for sending soldiers to the polls. Troops from Sherman’s army came home for the election and the Nineteenth Vermont, passing through, stopped long enough to vote for Morton.”

(Lincoln’s Plan of Reconstruction, William B. Hesseltine, Peter Smith, 1963, pp. 123-125)

Ohio AG: Planned Parenthood has been illegally disposing aborted babies in landfills

Via Michael

http://liveactionnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Planned-Parenthood-Kills-for-a-Living-204x300.jpg

We already know, thanks to The Center for Medical Progress, that Planned Parenthood has been selling the body parts of the children they abort (proven by the fact that they announced they would stop taking money for the practice). Now, Ohio’s attorney general has just announced that all three of the state’s Planned Parenthood clinics have been illegally disposing of the bodies of aborted babies by throwing them in landfills.

Good News: New NYT/CBS News Poll Shows Americans Oppose Assault Weapons Ban

Via avordvet

 

Something I forgot to mention in my previous post about the NYT/CBS News poll showing terrorism fears reaching levels not seen since the immediate weeks after the 9/11 attacks–Americans are also not really getting behind the president’s renewed call for a ban on assault rifles. Only 44 percent of Americans support the position, 50 percent oppose it.

The publication noted that support for this unserious gun control policy is now registering 19 points below how the public felt following the 2011 mass shooting in Tucson, Arizona, which almost took the life of former Rep. Gabby Giffords (R-AZ).

More @ Townhall

Progressives (commies) come unglued over 'white' student unions

Via comment by Quartermain on Saudis gunning for Trump? Muslim spies in the Obam...


Campuses across America already have black student unions. And “gay” student unions. And Hispanic student unions and Asian students unions and others.

And now they are seeing more and more “white student unions,” and progressives are coming unglued.

Some even say they need counseling over the trauma.

But one prominent black leader says it’s no big deal.

“I don’t know why they’re concerned about that,” said Jesse Lee Peterson, a civil rights leader who is the founder and president of BOND, the Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny. He also is the author of the new book,“The Antidote: Healing America From the Poison of Hate, Blame, and Victimhood.”

“I think the university officials should treat the white student union in the same manner that they treat the black student union. If they’ve allowed a black student union to happen, then they should allow the white student union, because blacks have no right to discriminate against white people.”

More @ WND

Looking For An Echo - Kenny Vance

Via Cousin Colby

 
 Doo Wop legend Kenny Vance performs this classic hit. Not the Lauryn Hill or Sesame Street Doo Wop hits but still rockin crowds in his hometown of Brooklyn, New York and worldwide, a gentleman with soul in his doowop.

Islamic terrorism: Fringe element or puritanical movement?

 http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/brave.jpg


Here's a simple question.

Is Islamic terrorism the product of:

Option A:  A tiny, fringe element.  Dead-enders.  Crazies.

-or-

Option B:  A growing puritanical movement.  Fanatics.  

Before you answer this question, consider this.

The popular belief, from individuals to the government, is that option A is correct.  This makes sense.

 More than a decade of experience "fighting" al Qaeda supports it.  

However, this assumption may not be true anymore.

ISIS has nearly one hundred thousand soldiers on the ground.  Its ideology is so compelling 30,000 people travelled to Syria to join them.  It controls a territory with a population of nearly 5 million people and has a budget in the billions of $.

This looks a lot more like option B.

Events Leading to Lincoln’s Second Election

 File:LincolnJohn.jpg

Image result for Sic Semper Tyrannis
Lincoln delivering his second inaugural address.

In his 1899 “Life of Lincoln” Norman Hapgood wrote that “Charles A. Dana testifies that the whole power of the [United States] War Department was used to secure Lincoln’s re-election on 1864. There is no doubt that this is true. Purists may turn pale at such things, but the world wants no prettified portrait of Mr. Lincoln’s Jesuitical ability to use the fox’s skin when the lion’s proves too short and that was one part of his enormous value.” The military was depended upon to deliver the soldier vote and ensure civilian ballots for the Republicans.
Bernhard Thuersam, www.Circa1865.com   The Great American Political Divide

Events Leading to Lincoln’s Second Election

“Lincoln’s second election was largely committed to the War and Navy Departments of the Federal government, he having been nominated by the same radical Republican Party . . . that nominated him at Chicago in 1860 . . .

Lincoln made criticism of his administration treason triable by court-martial, and United States soldiers ruled at the polls. General B.F. Butler’s book gives full particulars of the large force with which he controlled completely the voters of New York City; and McClure’s book, “Our Presidents,” tells “how necessary the army vote was, and was secured”; and Ida Tarbell says: “It was declared that Lincoln had been guilty of all the abuses of a military dictatorship.”

Lincoln’s [military] success was not won by the North, for a large part of the people were against Lincoln’s policy of coercion. So, seeing voluntary enlistments ceasing, and the draft unpopular, by offering large bounties and other inducements, Lincoln secured recruits, as follows: 176,800 Germans, 144,200 Irish, 99,000 English and British-Americans, 74,000 other foreigners, 186,017 Negroes, and from the border States 344,190, making a grand total of 1,151,660 men.

Therefore, had Lincoln depended on Northern volunteers to extricate himself from the desperate toils in which he was involved by his own willful and criminal war policy, he would surely have lost out; for, in 1864, there was great reaction against him.

Finally, let it not be forgotten, that [the] principle of government by the consent of the people [for which the South fought] was the rock on which our fathers of 1776 had built the “new and more perfect” Union of States; and later, was the fundamental principle of the Union of the Southern Confederacy . . .”

(Cornelius B. Hite, Washington, DC, Confederate Veteran, July, 1926, excerpts, pp. 248-249)

An Establishment Unhinged

Via III Percent Patriots 

 Why Liberal Media Hate Trump

(We)  don’t want open borders or mass immigration. (We) want people here illegally to be sent back, the borders secured, and a moratorium imposed on Muslim immigration until we fix the broken system.


As for the establishment, they are saying pretty much what The Donald is saying. To paraphrase Oliver Cromwell’s speech to the Rump Parliament:

 http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-you-have-sat-too-long-here-for-any-good-you-have-been-doing-depart-i-say-and-let-us-have-done-oliver-cromwell-304784.jpg


***************************************

Calling for a moratorium on Muslim immigration “until our country’s representatives can figure out what the hell is going on,” Donald Trump this week ignited a firestorm of historic proportions.

As all the old hate words — xenophobe, racist, bigot — have lost their electric charge from overuse, and Trump was being called a fascist demagogue and compared to Hitler and Mussolini.
The establishment seemed to have become unhinged.

Why the hysteria? Comes the reply: Trump’s call for a temporary ban on Muslim immigration tramples all over “American values” and everything we stand for, including the Constitution.

But is this really true?