tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566715115931065803.post3462089096977313636..comments2024-03-27T09:44:59.329-04:00Comments on Free North Carolina: Oath Keepers Opposes Anti-Gun Activist David Petraeus for Secretary of StateBrock Townsendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11404173139501539265noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566715115931065803.post-81865254940338562422016-12-11T05:57:08.696-05:002016-12-11T05:57:08.696-05:00These laws are meant to disarm Citizens, not crimi...These laws are meant to disarm Citizens, not criminals...<br /><br />This man has no right serving in a Constitutional capacity, when he is not complying to its protections. <br /><br />Absolutely and let us hope that his gets bypassed as<br />Romney did.Brock Townsendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11404173139501539265noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566715115931065803.post-91476156226643428432016-12-11T05:11:53.505-05:002016-12-11T05:11:53.505-05:00Congress nor the Senate or States cannot write sta...Congress nor the Senate or States cannot write state nor federal laws that regulate, restrict or suspend any of our Constitutional Protections.........<br /><br />"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2nd, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256<br /><br />What this means is this....Any regulations and restrictions to our owning firearms are absolutely UNCONSTITUTIONAL...<br />They are Illegal.<br /><br />DICK ACT of 1902 . . . CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) THE TRUMP CARD ENACTED BY CONGRESS FURTHER ASSERTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT AS UNTOUCHABLE....<br /><br />Further More...........<br /><br />The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows:<br /><br />"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and<br />void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)<br /><br />"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there<br />can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."<br />Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.<br /><br />"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it<br />imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442<br /><br />An ACT, LAW, STATUTE, nor a DECREE cannot suspend our 2cd amendment constitutional protections to freely bear arms.<br /><br />Background checks, laws or statutes forbidding the sale of firearms to felons are absolutely unconstitutional....<br /><br />There are roughly 69 million conservative gun owners and our not uniting to stop this is unconstitutional attack on our Natural rights is just unconscionable...They'll expand on this law just as they did with the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the 1968 Gun Control act signed by Johnson....<br /><br />These laws are meant to disarm Citizens, not criminals...<br /><br />This man has no right serving in a Constitutional capacity, when he is not complying to its protections. Jeffrey Hardinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03617094657758017945noreply@blogger.com