Friday, May 25, 2012

In Reversal, Army Bans High-Performance Rifle Mags

Via Survival

Oh no, we wouldn't want them to have a better means of defense.........

PMAG polymer M4 magazine

The Army has ordered that soldiers may use only government-issued magazines with their M4 carbines, a move that effectively bans one of the most dependable and widely used commercial-made magazines on today’s battlefield.

The past decade of war has spawned a wave of innovation in the commercial soldier weapons and equipment market. As a result, trigger-pullers in the Army, Marines and various service special operations communities now go to war armed with commercially designed kit that’s been tested under the most extreme combat conditions.

Near the top of such advancements is the PMAG polymer M4 magazine, introduced by Magpul Industries Corp. in 2007. Its rugged design has made it as one of the top performers in the small-arms accessory arena, according to combat veterans who credit the PMAG with drastically improving the reliability of the M4.

Despite the success of the PMAG, Army officials from the TACOM Life Cycle Management Command issued a “safety of use message” in April that placed it, and all other polymer magazines, on an unauthorized list.

The message did not single out PMAGs, but instead authorizes only the use of Army-issued aluminum magazines. The message offers little explanation for the new policy except to state that “Units are only authorized to use the Army-authorized magazines listed in the technical manuals.” Nor does it say what Army units should now do with the millions of dollars’ worth of PMAGs they’ve purchased over the years.

Magpul officials have been reluctant to comment on the issue. Robert Vidrine, vice president of marketing and sales, said the company found out about TACOM’s message only after it was released to the field.

The decision has left combat troops puzzled, since the PMAG has an Army-approved national stock number, which allows units to order them through the Army supply system.

“This just follows a long line of the Army, and military in general, not listening to the troops about equipment and weaponry,” said one Army infantryman serving in Southwest Afghanistan, who asked not to be identified.

“The PMAG is a great product … lightweight and durable. I have seen numerous special ops teams from all services pass through here, and they all use PMAGs. Also, a large amount of Marine infantry here use PMAGS, including their Force Recon elements.”

More @ Military.com

5 comments:

  1. Well, I look forward to the purchase of many PMAG's in the future at a much cheaper price...haha Good for me! idiots....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Myself, I prefer the Lancer AWM polymer mags, made in Allentown, PA. MagPul has done a great marketing job. But, I dont like the solid color or the itty-bitty round count window. Lancers have transluscent bodies and steel feed lips.

    Anyway.....perhaps Army making an effort to be a "uniformed" service again ? Those old GI mags never failed in M16.

    MAGPUL = Good marketing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What is was is that some general was going to retire and didn't get the cushy job that he wanted and this is retaliation.

    Nah couldn't be that.

    We all know that Generals are gods.....

    They know everything. Ok I'll turn the sarcasm off now. :)

    ReplyDelete