VERBATIM
Brooks Simpson has went
one bridge too far. This continual perversion
of random thoughts, all the while attempting to belittle and/or poke
fun at anyone who doesn’t match his intelligence, is quite pitiful. We
have a person who claims so many titles of merit, yet cannot get his ego
under control, especially in regards to the vileness, arrogance and
disgust which shows through in his attacks on so many people and groups.
What is it that drives a man insane because of a war, and the country
that lost that war 150 years ago? It’s said that a definition of
insanity is doing the same thing over and over again in the hopes of
finding a different result. Does Simpson expect the descendents of those
conquered people to roll over and kiss his feet when he antagonizes,
belittles and ridicules them? Does he have a secret desire to be
worshiped as a conquering king, with his very words seen as Law? He
can’t say in fairness that he corrects both sides and is fair to
both sides, because the numbers of his articles and posts does not bear
this out (with a view that represents only one type of people, from one
part of the country). Maybe it’s time to look at Simpson’s bigotry and
prejudice for a change?
Simpson’s latest gaffe is to once again mock another pro-Southerner.
Me! Simpson has a proven history of picking out what he considers weak
statements, which he then assumes would be hard for the author to
defend. Most of the time he picks simple mistakes such as names, dates
and places, and uses these mistakes to disqualify the author from
having any merits or credibility – especially in regards to the entire
subject of pro-Southern history, heritage and culture. Yet it’s Simpson
who has the log in his eye, and is also subject to mistakes…mistakes
much worse than from those people he singles out. Yet sadly, he gets
away with this every day. It’s time to come clean Simpson! It’s time to
show off that log in your eye!
For instance: Why did you pull that 2
nd debate from your Crossroads blog? Does your mind need refreshing concerning that 2
nd
exchange/debate? And why should I or anyone allow their children to be
taught by Marxists and revisionists such as you? Yes, I can most
definitely make the term “Marxist” apply and stick to you, and John
Lucas has NOTHING to do with that! (
again, see Simpson’s post on Lamb Here).
And Simpson pretends he doesn’t know he is a Marxist? Better stated
according to Simpson’s own response is, he doesn’t have the knowledge to
understand his own Marxist philosophy and ideology. A person cannot
grasp the concepts of history regardless to the simple facts concerning
dates, names and places – unless they also know and understand the
philosophy used in forming and applying concepts (as a basis of
Political Science). Simpson proves he can remember simplistic dates,
names, places, documents…etc.., but he fails miserably in relating all
these things in the study of Political Science.
From the beginnings of written history there has been a plethora of
writings concerning government and the body politics. Even the Christian
Scriptures references governments and their relationship to a moral
society. There are many hundreds of philosophers to draw information
from throughout history in helping understand, and in forming opinions
as to how politics and government best serves the people. For the sake
of simplicity I’m going to use two philosophers: John Locke and Karl
Marx. Both represent the culmination of their respective philosophies
and ideologies.
(Note to the reader: I refer to both philosophy and
ideology as both are related. Philosophy being the faith and
understanding one holds, while ideology is the practice of it. It’s very
similar to faith and religion – with religion being the practice of
one’s faith.)
Simpson
asks; “I’d love to know what makes me a Marxist. Heck, it would be
interesting to see whether Mike Lamb understands what it means to be a
Marxist.” I don’t need anyone telling me what a Marxist is, nor do you –
unless you are really that ignorant. Yet there you are playing naïve
and ignorant by asking the question. Which is it; Are you actually
ignorant? Or are you being coy and pretending to be ignorant? You’ve
read John Locke just as I have. But how much? And how much do you agree
with John Locke? You’ve also read Karl Marx and Engels, just as I have.
Again, how much I don’t know. But it’s obvious that you agree with much
of his writings because your ideology concerning revisionist history and
political science agrees with much of Marx’s and Engel’s writings.
Therefore, it becomes a moot point for me to explain to you what Marxism
entails, as you already know what it entails. If you don’t know what
Marxism entails, then all the more reason you don’t qualify for the
position you now claim.
Let’s cut the chase Simpson; Why don’t you just tell us how many
planks of the Communist Manifesto you agree with, either in part or in
full? While that’s only a small scratch on the surface concerning
Marxism, it goes far in defining what a person believes in their other
opinions concerning political science, and religion (including humanism
and Christianity, as well all their beliefs concerning life). If you
disagree and deny any claims to the 10 Planks of the Communist
Manifesto, then we can ascertain what you believe concerning John Locke,
Natural Law and self-determination. But then again, I already know you
don’t believe in self-determination as the free will of man, but rather
as the “collective” form of man, once again drawing upon Marx as a
collective.
Of course, I don’t know what I’m talking about according to Simpson
and his minions. No Southerner knows anything compared to any Yankee –
and that’s a point that has been pushed down all of America’s throats
for the past 150 years.
It’s another form of control over your enemies.
There’s nothing I can say, short of agreeing with Simpson on
practically everything he says, that would change his opinion of me –
and then I’d have reservations on that opinion simply because I’m a
Southerner. I don’t claim any special privileges by government
education. Yet all that I can be attacked with is by insults, ad-hominum
style. I find it a shame and pity that a man making such claims of
educational knowledge as Simpson cannot handle himself any better that
what he has shown against me, and any other Southerner who may have
never benefited from the “higher” education he has been privileged to
receive.
Sadder still is the fact he uses his claimed talents to teach and
train other young adults to be good socialists just like him. In return
Simpson receives a university salary, speaking fees for speaking around
the world, promotional fees, and most likely other revenue from
activities we know nothing about – and people call this patriotism.
People don’t know real patriotism, because people such as Simpson have
been teaching their version of patriotism – and not what patriotism
really is! All because the world has a group of people who wishes to
control and force their views onto everyone else – all the while forcing
those people to pay for it. It’s nothing short of forced slavery by mob
rule, through a tyrannical Federal Government!
For further reading:
