Friday, September 30, 2016
My Perspective of the UDC Organization
Via Billy
As I previously stated on this forum I think there are many fine ladies in the UDC but the problem seems to be with the ones they elect to the top leadership positions both state and national. They appear to want to be only a history group and unwilling to get involved in the defense of our monuments, flags, symbols and all. Just meet-eat-retreat and feel great about themselves while our CSA history, heritage, and culture is under all out Marxist Socialist attack at the national, state, and local levels.
Marxist Socialism-Communism uses HUMANITARIANISM as a cloak to shelter their evil agenda of stripping people of their freedom and taking total control. They lure and entice people by offering free financial aid and free goods and services. A socialist is best described as a communist who does NOT YET have enough political power to take everything you have. Progressive and critical thinker are deceptive names used in place of socialist and communist to gain public acceptance. Karl Marx said "people separated from their heritage are easily persuaded" and communist Vladimir Lenin coined the term "useful idiots" to describe those who through ignorance work to help achieve adoption of the socialist communist manifesto.
There is a story-probably fictional- but good enough to be true that explains how the socialist-communist trap operates. In the Okefenokee swamp in southeast Georgia there was a drove of wild hogs that none of the locals had been successful in catching with dogs. One day a stranger showed up. He built a pen but left the gate open. He put corn out away from the gate. Slowly the young pigs began to come and eat the corn. Finally the older hogs decided if the young pigs were going to eat the corn that they might as well also. The stranger kept placing the corn closer and closer to the pen and gate and eventually inside the pen. Then one night when all the pigs and hogs were inside the pen eating he sat in a tree stand and pulled a rope which sprung the gate shut.
This upper UDC leadership appears to have been indoctrinated with Marxist political correctness and a desire to be liked and approved of by the liberal socialist left. They seem terrified that their good image will be stained if they defend the Confederacy which is associated with slavery. Never mind that the north (New England) who was primarily responsible for the development of American slavery gets a near free pass although attacks on the U.S. flag have now started as us Confederates warned would happen.
I think the original UDC ladies who accomplished so much in the late 19th and early 20th centuries would be ashamed of this seemingly timid and cowardly group who is now in leadership positions and would deem them unworthy of their sires and fit only for a tyrants yoke. Unfortunately we have some like this in the SCV also.
Four ladies that I know and have tremendous admiration for who are doing all within their ability with the resources they have available to defend our CSA history, heritage, and culture are Mrs Rena Cobb of Preston Georgia, Mrs. Joan Hough (pronounced Huff) of Texas, Mrs.Pat Godwin of Alabama, and Mrs.Susan Hathaway of Virginia. And I am sure there are many many more.Thanks ladies for all you do.
And two of the many many gentlemen who deserve recognition, appreciation and respect for the work they do are Chuck Demastus in Mississippi who publishes Southern Heritage News and Views (SHNV) and Bernhard Thuersam of North Carolina who publishes info. in SHNV. Mr. Thuersam is chairman of the North Carolina Sesquicentennial Commission. I don't think anyone could have done a better job. He is a native New Yorker who came south in the military, learned the truth, and became a more staunch Confederate than most southerners.
James W. King
SCV Camp 141 Commander
Lt. Col. Thomas Nelsons Rangers
Albany Georgia
As I previously stated on this forum I think there are many fine ladies in the UDC but the problem seems to be with the ones they elect to the top leadership positions both state and national. They appear to want to be only a history group and unwilling to get involved in the defense of our monuments, flags, symbols and all. Just meet-eat-retreat and feel great about themselves while our CSA history, heritage, and culture is under all out Marxist Socialist attack at the national, state, and local levels.
Marxist Socialism-Communism uses HUMANITARIANISM as a cloak to shelter their evil agenda of stripping people of their freedom and taking total control. They lure and entice people by offering free financial aid and free goods and services. A socialist is best described as a communist who does NOT YET have enough political power to take everything you have. Progressive and critical thinker are deceptive names used in place of socialist and communist to gain public acceptance. Karl Marx said "people separated from their heritage are easily persuaded" and communist Vladimir Lenin coined the term "useful idiots" to describe those who through ignorance work to help achieve adoption of the socialist communist manifesto.
There is a story-probably fictional- but good enough to be true that explains how the socialist-communist trap operates. In the Okefenokee swamp in southeast Georgia there was a drove of wild hogs that none of the locals had been successful in catching with dogs. One day a stranger showed up. He built a pen but left the gate open. He put corn out away from the gate. Slowly the young pigs began to come and eat the corn. Finally the older hogs decided if the young pigs were going to eat the corn that they might as well also. The stranger kept placing the corn closer and closer to the pen and gate and eventually inside the pen. Then one night when all the pigs and hogs were inside the pen eating he sat in a tree stand and pulled a rope which sprung the gate shut.
This upper UDC leadership appears to have been indoctrinated with Marxist political correctness and a desire to be liked and approved of by the liberal socialist left. They seem terrified that their good image will be stained if they defend the Confederacy which is associated with slavery. Never mind that the north (New England) who was primarily responsible for the development of American slavery gets a near free pass although attacks on the U.S. flag have now started as us Confederates warned would happen.
I think the original UDC ladies who accomplished so much in the late 19th and early 20th centuries would be ashamed of this seemingly timid and cowardly group who is now in leadership positions and would deem them unworthy of their sires and fit only for a tyrants yoke. Unfortunately we have some like this in the SCV also.
Four ladies that I know and have tremendous admiration for who are doing all within their ability with the resources they have available to defend our CSA history, heritage, and culture are Mrs Rena Cobb of Preston Georgia, Mrs. Joan Hough (pronounced Huff) of Texas, Mrs.Pat Godwin of Alabama, and Mrs.Susan Hathaway of Virginia. And I am sure there are many many more.Thanks ladies for all you do.
And two of the many many gentlemen who deserve recognition, appreciation and respect for the work they do are Chuck Demastus in Mississippi who publishes Southern Heritage News and Views (SHNV) and Bernhard Thuersam of North Carolina who publishes info. in SHNV. Mr. Thuersam is chairman of the North Carolina Sesquicentennial Commission. I don't think anyone could have done a better job. He is a native New Yorker who came south in the military, learned the truth, and became a more staunch Confederate than most southerners.
James W. King
SCV Camp 141 Commander
Lt. Col. Thomas Nelsons Rangers
Albany Georgia
A Silhouette in the Sunset
Via The Feral Irishman
His mother was born in Kansas. His father hailed from Kenya. These star-crossed lovers met in a Russian Language class at the University of Hawaii in 1960. A year later, he was born on August 4, 1961. Even today, his origin of birth remains a topic of national concern. In fact, the subject of his birth certificate was recently raised by the NBC moderator, Lester Holt, during the presidential debate on September 26, 2016. This, in turn, fomented a very heated discussion between the presidential candidates: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
His origin of birth was first challenged during the primaries for the 2008 presidential election by his then opponent, Hillary Clinton. The controversy was later claimed to be settled upon the release of his long-form birth certificate in 2011. However, many today still claim his long-form birth certificate is a fake. Multiple electronic document experts currently contend the document uploaded by the White House is not a scanned version of the original long-form, paper birth certificate. It is instead, a “nine-layered” document with many electronically added overlays proving it to be assembled digitally as opposed to being an exact copy of the original.
His mother was born in Kansas. His father hailed from Kenya. These star-crossed lovers met in a Russian Language class at the University of Hawaii in 1960. A year later, he was born on August 4, 1961. Even today, his origin of birth remains a topic of national concern. In fact, the subject of his birth certificate was recently raised by the NBC moderator, Lester Holt, during the presidential debate on September 26, 2016. This, in turn, fomented a very heated discussion between the presidential candidates: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
His origin of birth was first challenged during the primaries for the 2008 presidential election by his then opponent, Hillary Clinton. The controversy was later claimed to be settled upon the release of his long-form birth certificate in 2011. However, many today still claim his long-form birth certificate is a fake. Multiple electronic document experts currently contend the document uploaded by the White House is not a scanned version of the original long-form, paper birth certificate. It is instead, a “nine-layered” document with many electronically added overlays proving it to be assembled digitally as opposed to being an exact copy of the original.
More @ The Burning Platform
Lester the Media Molester and Hillary’s ever-evolving ‘convictions’
Via Billy
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Just when you thought the media could not get any more dishonest and unserious, along comes Lester Holt.
Yeah, the guy blundered through Monday night’s debate getting his “fact checks” wrong with Donald Trump and letting Hillary Clinton skate along on her river of lies. And, yeah, the guy interrupted Mr. Trump seven times as much as he interrupted Mrs. Clinton. And, yeah, he asked far more probing follow-up questions of Mr. Trump and seemed to only shut down any lines of inquiry into Mrs. Clinton that opened up.
But all that is just typical partisan noise we have come to expect from the leftwing media.
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Just when you thought the media could not get any more dishonest and unserious, along comes Lester Holt.
Yeah, the guy blundered through Monday night’s debate getting his “fact checks” wrong with Donald Trump and letting Hillary Clinton skate along on her river of lies. And, yeah, the guy interrupted Mr. Trump seven times as much as he interrupted Mrs. Clinton. And, yeah, he asked far more probing follow-up questions of Mr. Trump and seemed to only shut down any lines of inquiry into Mrs. Clinton that opened up.
But all that is just typical partisan noise we have come to expect from the leftwing media.
More @ The Washington Times
Did Hillary Clinton know Lester Holt’s questions well before Monday’s Presidential debate?
Via comment by Avraham on Hillary had teleprompter on stage: Cleanup Man Is ...
“News” items like this, isolated, unverifiable, bordering on the apocryphal, strike me as dubious. They straddle that line of legitimacy and believability that makes them hard to discount, yet you still have to wonder how rigorous the fact-checking was that went into checking the story before publication. But still, there is that nagging reticence I experience as an open-minded cynic; it could easily be true, and since the MSM is essentially a Hillary-apologist tide of idiocy and vile manipulation, makes some pragmatic sense.
And especially, it is Hillary we’re speaking of. Would this be so shocking?
CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES
“News” items like this, isolated, unverifiable, bordering on the apocryphal, strike me as dubious. They straddle that line of legitimacy and believability that makes them hard to discount, yet you still have to wonder how rigorous the fact-checking was that went into checking the story before publication. But still, there is that nagging reticence I experience as an open-minded cynic; it could easily be true, and since the MSM is essentially a Hillary-apologist tide of idiocy and vile manipulation, makes some pragmatic sense.
And especially, it is Hillary we’re speaking of. Would this be so shocking?
CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES
More @ Social Extinction
20+ Historic Photos Of Love During Wartime
Via Cousin Colby
Times change. Nothing remains the same forever. But as you can see from these heartwarming pictures compiled by Bored Panda, one thing doesn't change no matter how much time passes, and that's love.
Usually
when we say goodbye to somebody, we're pretty sure that we're going to
see them again, and soon. But many of the people in the photographs
below, taken during WW2, had no idea if they were ever going to be
reunited with their loved ones again. And sadly, many weren't.
These
pictures serve to remind us that life is short, so don't wait until
Valentine's Day to tell somebody you love them. Tell them today!
More @ Bored Panda
Trump Right on Trade Predators
Is America still a serious nation?
Consider. While U.S. elites were denouncing Donald Trump as unfit to serve for having compared Miss Universe 1996 to “Miss Piggy” of “The Muppets,” the World Trade Organization was validating the principal plank of his platform.
America’s allies are cheating and robbing her blind on trade.
According to the WTO, Britain, France, Spain, Germany and the EU pumped $22 billion in illegal subsidies into Airbus to swindle Boeing out of the sale of 375 commercial jets.
More @ Patrick J. Buchanan
Hillary had teleprompter on stage: Cleanup Man Is Linked to Egypt, Arab Spring
Via Billy
Hillary Clinton is not above cheating, lying or stealing to get what she wants so it shouldn’t be any surprise that she is being accused of cheating during Monday’s 1st Presidential debate. Various ways that Hillary apparently cheated have already been identified (e.g. the moderator Holt’s bias, Hillary’s hand signals to Holt during the debate and the noticeable unexplained wires on her back).
Other unusual items are now literally coming to light that show that Hillary may have cheated in additional ways. The below video shows a light on Hillary’s podium go out after the debate. Trump did not have the same light on his podium. The bright light that went out after the debate was a not a light for reading because it was too high and faced her and not the podium. The light appears to be more like a small monitor or teleprompter perhaps used to transmit messages to her during the debate.
Hillary Clinton is not above cheating, lying or stealing to get what she wants so it shouldn’t be any surprise that she is being accused of cheating during Monday’s 1st Presidential debate. Various ways that Hillary apparently cheated have already been identified (e.g. the moderator Holt’s bias, Hillary’s hand signals to Holt during the debate and the noticeable unexplained wires on her back).
Other unusual items are now literally coming to light that show that Hillary may have cheated in additional ways. The below video shows a light on Hillary’s podium go out after the debate. Trump did not have the same light on his podium. The bright light that went out after the debate was a not a light for reading because it was too high and faced her and not the podium. The light appears to be more like a small monitor or teleprompter perhaps used to transmit messages to her during the debate.
More @ The Gateway Pundit
The Transformation and Subjugation of American Culture by Privilege and Immigration
Via Dan
My grandparents immigrated
legally to our country from Europe around 1900. They came to
participate in the financial opportunities afforded by our free market
economy, to raise and create a prosperous future for their children and
grandchildren, and to live as free citizens.
Anxious to establish
themselves as Americans , not Hungarian-Americans, Austrian-Americans,
or Russian-Americans, my grandparents enrolled in night school to learn
English and went to work.
While keeping some of the customs and
traditions from their past, they accepted nothing less than complete
immersion, especially for their children, in the culture, laws, and
history of our nation. My grandparents took great pride in grabbing
their piece of the American Dream by using their own two hands and a lot
of hard work.
More @ Dr. Dan's Freedom Forum
Globalist Panic: United Nations Urges Action to STOP TRUMP
Via Billy
The United Nations urged globalist supporters to take action to stop Donald Trump.
The UN links to the globalist progressive website AVAAZ which is linked to the far left smear site Media Matters.
AVAAZ is running a globalist campaign this week to stop Trump.
The Politico reported:
The United Nations News Centre — the official U.N. news service — tweeted, then quickly pulled, a post that called for “8 million Americans abroad” to “stop Trump.”
The United Nations urged globalist supporters to take action to stop Donald Trump.
The UN links to the globalist progressive website AVAAZ which is linked to the far left smear site Media Matters.
AVAAZ is running a globalist campaign this week to stop Trump.
The Politico reported:
The United Nations News Centre — the official U.N. news service — tweeted, then quickly pulled, a post that called for “8 million Americans abroad” to “stop Trump.”
More @ The Gateway Pundit
2016 Election: Desperation’s Extreme Alternatives
Via Billy
Terms such as “shadow players” and “powerbrokers,” circulate loosely during election seasons since they are in charge of selecting those who will be. And it is to these unknowns, those who operate without recognition or restraint, that Trump has manhandled and mystified.
As events unfold, the credit for this Trump movement rests squarely upon the shoulders of those elitists. During their ongoing pursuit for control, they themselves fell prey to one of nature’s ever present callings. Although difficult to accept and even harder to admit, the urge of “impatience” beckoned and disrupted their best laid plans.
For as long as I dare remember, the art of gradualism has been steadily at play. Way back when unwarranted building blocks were established, those credited with such were content in knowing that they started the greatest of revolutions without firing a shot.
Those long-ago players assumed others would fill their vacancies and carry on their quest. Since this policy of gradual revisionism necessitated lifetimes, a general understanding was shared that eventually all efforts would be justified and fulfilled by those who followed faithfully.
This process granted the schemers and plotters the same undetectable action which the hands of a clock offers. Appearing to be stationary, they move at a very slow and unseen pace. This is the system of gradualism and its theme is patience.
Americans have been given one last chance and it came about quite by accident. If everything continued creeping along, as was the case during the last century, eventually, it would have been too late to reverse. However, happenstance interrupted and Trump beckoned our hearts and minds with his “make America great again” and “what do you have to lose!”
His introduction and subsequent success was made possible based upon one blunder which went both unnoticed and naturally unreported. In all probability, this faux pas was due to the human instinct of impatience since an easy win was hard to pass up.
It’s understandable that the “powers to be” were at ease with a Clinton Presidential campaign in 2008. That was until an unknown Senator from Illinois blustered onto the scene with an impassioned speech at the democrat convention. From that performance, his presidential potential was irresistible.
Instead of realizing that this young Senator would be a perfect follow up to Clinton’s socialized styled Administration, the social draw for racial equality screamed with a magnetic appeal. As we now are mercifully wrapping up Obama’s second term, that impulsive shuffling of candidates is currently posing a turbulent stretch run and in retrospect, a pause for regret.
Just imagine if the original progression was maintained. After eight years, an aging Clinton would hand the gavel over to a younger Obama, who after additional Senate service, would be a more formidable candidate. Given the public’s rapture which he inspired back in 2008, is there any doubt that today, we would be looking at an Obama presidency with a probable re-election in 2020?
And how did this mishap occur? Simply from the frailties of the human spirit which are often irresistible, even to the point of affecting those shadowy Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) elites. So, they took the bait and succumbed to the easy win. And it was way too easy. But now, the reverse is true.
Emerging from the first Presidential debate, a campaign that otherwise would have been a “no-brainer” is now a grind-it-out slug fest. But most importantly, that interloper has awakened a sleeping giant.
All the post debate media spinning has Clinton winning hands down. However, voters don’t agree. If only from the last eight years, public trust of the media’s word has waned drastically. It’s ironic that while we are fed reports of the low Congressional approval ratings, those same numbers could and should be shared by the media’s punditry.
As a result, their bantering about the recent debate falls upon deaf ears. At this point, after nearly eight dreadful years of Obama spins and distortions, the democrat’s weightiest ally has lost its effectiveness.
So, is it any wonder that desperation has now crept onto the democrat slate once again? Without a credible candidate to showcase and with its propaganda arm in disarray, extreme measures are now being revisited. Is it possible that street violence has replaced the influences from the journalistic sword?
Given that such discord is based upon racial inequality, a political theme has reared its ugly brow in that the locales for such mayhem do not conflate with that perceived style of injustice.
What caused such rioting in Charlotte when both participants were racially identical? That compared to what occurred in Oklahoma, where a white/black incident took place? Could it be that Oklahoma, as a “red State,” offers less political incentive than the “toss up” State of North Carolina? Has racial rioting become a political tool?
While this thought may seem vulgar and unacceptable, so is the fact that four Americans were abandoned at their time of need. Repetitious is this pattern of pre election desperation which again dictates extreme alternatives.
Terms such as “shadow players” and “powerbrokers,” circulate loosely during election seasons since they are in charge of selecting those who will be. And it is to these unknowns, those who operate without recognition or restraint, that Trump has manhandled and mystified.
As events unfold, the credit for this Trump movement rests squarely upon the shoulders of those elitists. During their ongoing pursuit for control, they themselves fell prey to one of nature’s ever present callings. Although difficult to accept and even harder to admit, the urge of “impatience” beckoned and disrupted their best laid plans.
For as long as I dare remember, the art of gradualism has been steadily at play. Way back when unwarranted building blocks were established, those credited with such were content in knowing that they started the greatest of revolutions without firing a shot.
Those long-ago players assumed others would fill their vacancies and carry on their quest. Since this policy of gradual revisionism necessitated lifetimes, a general understanding was shared that eventually all efforts would be justified and fulfilled by those who followed faithfully.
This process granted the schemers and plotters the same undetectable action which the hands of a clock offers. Appearing to be stationary, they move at a very slow and unseen pace. This is the system of gradualism and its theme is patience.
Americans have been given one last chance and it came about quite by accident. If everything continued creeping along, as was the case during the last century, eventually, it would have been too late to reverse. However, happenstance interrupted and Trump beckoned our hearts and minds with his “make America great again” and “what do you have to lose!”
His introduction and subsequent success was made possible based upon one blunder which went both unnoticed and naturally unreported. In all probability, this faux pas was due to the human instinct of impatience since an easy win was hard to pass up.
It’s understandable that the “powers to be” were at ease with a Clinton Presidential campaign in 2008. That was until an unknown Senator from Illinois blustered onto the scene with an impassioned speech at the democrat convention. From that performance, his presidential potential was irresistible.
Instead of realizing that this young Senator would be a perfect follow up to Clinton’s socialized styled Administration, the social draw for racial equality screamed with a magnetic appeal. As we now are mercifully wrapping up Obama’s second term, that impulsive shuffling of candidates is currently posing a turbulent stretch run and in retrospect, a pause for regret.
Just imagine if the original progression was maintained. After eight years, an aging Clinton would hand the gavel over to a younger Obama, who after additional Senate service, would be a more formidable candidate. Given the public’s rapture which he inspired back in 2008, is there any doubt that today, we would be looking at an Obama presidency with a probable re-election in 2020?
And how did this mishap occur? Simply from the frailties of the human spirit which are often irresistible, even to the point of affecting those shadowy Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) elites. So, they took the bait and succumbed to the easy win. And it was way too easy. But now, the reverse is true.
Emerging from the first Presidential debate, a campaign that otherwise would have been a “no-brainer” is now a grind-it-out slug fest. But most importantly, that interloper has awakened a sleeping giant.
All the post debate media spinning has Clinton winning hands down. However, voters don’t agree. If only from the last eight years, public trust of the media’s word has waned drastically. It’s ironic that while we are fed reports of the low Congressional approval ratings, those same numbers could and should be shared by the media’s punditry.
As a result, their bantering about the recent debate falls upon deaf ears. At this point, after nearly eight dreadful years of Obama spins and distortions, the democrat’s weightiest ally has lost its effectiveness.
So, is it any wonder that desperation has now crept onto the democrat slate once again? Without a credible candidate to showcase and with its propaganda arm in disarray, extreme measures are now being revisited. Is it possible that street violence has replaced the influences from the journalistic sword?
Given that such discord is based upon racial inequality, a political theme has reared its ugly brow in that the locales for such mayhem do not conflate with that perceived style of injustice.
What caused such rioting in Charlotte when both participants were racially identical? That compared to what occurred in Oklahoma, where a white/black incident took place? Could it be that Oklahoma, as a “red State,” offers less political incentive than the “toss up” State of North Carolina? Has racial rioting become a political tool?
While this thought may seem vulgar and unacceptable, so is the fact that four Americans were abandoned at their time of need. Repetitious is this pattern of pre election desperation which again dictates extreme alternatives.
Just When You Thought They Couldn't Be Any More Insane...
Via comment by JWMJR on Syrian Conflict Explained: Highly restricted brief...
Yesterday's most ignored headline was that our horse faced, horses ass of a Secretary of State had given Russia what amounted to an ultimatum demanding that all offensive operations against anti Assad forces i.e. ISIS, in Aleppo be halted immediately or all cooperation between the US and Russia would stop.
Never mind the arrogance of such a statement, I would like for these bungling fools to tell us just one thing in Aleppo or all of Syria for that matter, that is worth creating a direct military confrontation between the US and Russia. A confrontation that could well drag us and Europe into another world war.
And no I won't accept any BS answers about how brutal the Assad regime is or how the assault constitutes s humanitarian crisis. In both cases I would respond, so what? The Assads have ruled Syria with an iron fist for half a century. And if we're so worried about a body count in Aleppo why aren't we worried about the body counts in Chicago or Baltimore or our own nations capital? Seems to me this is the same Bashier Assad that old horse face and the Democrats were declaring to be a "great reformer" just a few short years ago when they thought such declarations could be used as a political bludgeon against both the Bush administration and Israel.
Yesterday's most ignored headline was that our horse faced, horses ass of a Secretary of State had given Russia what amounted to an ultimatum demanding that all offensive operations against anti Assad forces i.e. ISIS, in Aleppo be halted immediately or all cooperation between the US and Russia would stop.
Never mind the arrogance of such a statement, I would like for these bungling fools to tell us just one thing in Aleppo or all of Syria for that matter, that is worth creating a direct military confrontation between the US and Russia. A confrontation that could well drag us and Europe into another world war.
And no I won't accept any BS answers about how brutal the Assad regime is or how the assault constitutes s humanitarian crisis. In both cases I would respond, so what? The Assads have ruled Syria with an iron fist for half a century. And if we're so worried about a body count in Aleppo why aren't we worried about the body counts in Chicago or Baltimore or our own nations capital? Seems to me this is the same Bashier Assad that old horse face and the Democrats were declaring to be a "great reformer" just a few short years ago when they thought such declarations could be used as a political bludgeon against both the Bush administration and Israel.
More @ Joe Martin's Ghost
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)