By Kris W. Kobach, the elected Secretary of State of Kansas. An
expert in immigration in law and policy, he coauthored the Arizona SB-1070
immigration law and represented in federal court the 10 ICE agents who
sued to stop Obama’s 2012 executive amnesty. In 2017 President Trump
named him Vice Chairman of the Presidential Commission on Election
Integrity. He is currently a candidate for governor of Kansas. His
website is kriskobach.com.
For years, the mainstream media has ignored the problem of voter
fraud and belittled those of us who are trying to do something about it.
And when secretaries of state like me identify cases of fraud, we are
told that the number of incidents of voter fraud is too insignificant to
matter.
Now, however, facts have come to light that indicate that a pivotal,
close election was likely changed through voter fraud on November 8,
2016: New Hampshire’s U.S. Senate Seat, and perhaps also New Hampshire’s
four electoral college votes in the presidential election.
New Hampshire is one of
fifteen
states that allow same-day voter registration. The benefit of same-day
registration is that it allows a person who has procrastinated or has
forgotten to register to nonetheless cast a ballot on election day. The
downside of same-day registration is that it does not allow the state
time to assess the eligibility of the voter. A volunteer poll worker
simply accepts a modicum of identification and takes the voter at his
word that he’s a U.S. citizen resident of the state who is eligible to
vote.
New Hampshire is also a battleground state. Unlike neighboring
Massachusetts and Vermont, which reliably vote for the Democrat in
presidential elections, New Hampshire can swing either way. It has long
been reported, anecdotally, that out-of-staters take advantage of New
Hampshire’s same-day registration and head to the Granite State to cast
fraudulent votes.
Now there’s proof.
According to
statistics
released by the Speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives,
on the date of the general election in November 2016, there were 6,540
same-day registrants who registered to vote in New Hampshire using an
out-of-state
driver’s license to prove their identity. In and of itself, that
doesn’t prove that any fraud occurred – theoretically, each of those
individuals could have been someone who recently moved to the State and
had not yet had time to get a New Hampshire driver’s license. According
to New Hampshire law, a new resident has 60 days to obtain a New
Hampshire driver’s license.
So if those 6,540 voters were
bona fide New Hampshire
residents, they would get their driver’s license no later than January
7, 2017. However, the numbers tell a very different story. It turns out
that, as of August 30, 2017 – nearly
ten months after the
election – only 1,014 of the 6,540 same-day registrants who registered
with an out-of-state license had obtained a New Hampshire driver’s
license. The other 5,526 individuals never obtained a New Hampshire
driver’s license. And, of those 5,526, only 213 registered a vehicle in
New Hampshire.
So 5,313 of those voters neither obtained a New Hampshire driver’s
license nor registered a vehicle in New Hampshire. They have not
followed the legal requirements for residents regarding driver’s
licenses, and it appears that they are not actually residing in New
Hampshire. It seems that they never were
bona fide residents of the State.
5,513 is a big number – more than enough to swing two very important
elections. The closest major election was the contest between incumbent
Republican U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte and challenger Maggie Hassan (D).
Hassan won the election by a razor-thin
margin
of 1,017 votes. Those 5,313 fraudulent votes were more than enough to
swing the election. If 59.2 percent or more of them went for Hassan,
then the election was stolen through voter fraud. That’s likely, since
the surrounding states are Democrat strongholds.
It’s also possible that New Hampshire’s four electoral college votes
were swung to Hillary Clinton through illegal voting by nonresidents.
Clinton won New Hampshire by only 2,732 votes. If 74.8 percent of the
5,513 fraudulent votes were cast for Clinton, then the presidential
election in New Hampshire was tipped as well.
If the presidential contest had been closer and had come down to a
margin of three or four electoral college votes, then this voter fraud
might have had extraordinary consequences. Regardless, in the Senate
contest, it is highly likely that voting by nonresidents changed the
result.
And that is already having consequences for the nation. If the 52-48
Republican-Democrat balance in the Senate were 53-47, it could change
the balance in any number of votes – not the least of which would be the
effort to repeal Obamacare.
But the mainstream media will tell us, “Move along, there’s nothing to see here.” Voter fraud virtually never occurs.