Via
WRSA
An early Robert A. Heinlein novella with the above title described
an American theocracy that was eventually brought down in a violent
revolution. I have no idea whether the young Heinlein was subject to
influences that might have predisposed him to believe that such a future
was probable. However, the Afterword to his collection
Revolt in 2100, in which that novella appeared, suggests that he did think it plausible at least.
No, that future didn’t arrive. Instead, the United States
has turned in the opposite direction: secular and hedonistic. But
Heinlein wasn’t the only writer to explore the idea of an American
theocracy. Michael Flynn, whose work has often been compared with
Heinlein’s, sketched such a future in his
The Nanotech Chronicles. If he was guided by presentiments like Heinlein’s, he gave no indication of it.
As usual, I’m sort of skirting my point here, so I’ll put it right out in the open:
Many trends are merely mental artifacts.
One can “assemble” such a “trend” by choosing what to look at
and what to ignore, which your detractors will call “cherry-picking” the
news. However, the counterpoised effect is just as important:
Many who deny a trend simply refuse to see it.
And inasmuch as some trends are pretty
BLEEP!ing scary, the urge to take refuge in I-don’t-see-it denial can be very strong.
The previous 250 words are prefatory. I see a trend in
motion. It’s beginning to look to me like an avalanche. And I don’t like
what it portends. But I’ll allow that I could be wrong; it’s the
absolute requirement of intellectual honesty. In fact, I
want to be wrong. So in reading what follows, please, Gentle Reader, do your best to:
- Refrain from an emotional response;
- Focus on the available data;
- If you don’t see it, tell me so and why.
We begin.
