"Senator Kinnaird:
Please diligently help to stop all legislation banning weapons of any type including high capacity magazines and assault weapons, and any management of ammunition. The move that the president and other colleagues of yours to push the ban through as quickly as possible is a clear attack on our 2nd amendment and the constitution!
Sincerely,
Jay Anderson
Useful idiot
Thank you for your message against gun controls. I appreciate the information you provided. My objection is that there are virtually no controls on the millions of guns that get into the wrong hands - kids in city ghettos who have no moral standards and respond to impulse and bad environments. Or guns in homes where they are accessible to children who shoot them by accident, or even use them on their own family members; accidents in which adults shoot children, or use them to kill children, or the easy killing by suicide with guns. In countries where guns are not available to the general population, there are very, very few such tragedies. Just look at the statistics. The greatest number of gun violence is not from mass shootings by mentally ill people, but just the sheer numbers of carelessly or malevolently used guns.
As to the Second Amendment. I believe that was wrongly decided by the U. S. Supreme Court. First, it overturned 100 years of gun decisions that it is not a personal right to bear arms, but only a right of the Militia, which is a military branch -- along with the land and naval forces. I cite the following: Article I, Section 8, 15. "The Congress shall have power: . .. To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions"; Section 8, 16. "To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, . . .according to the discipline prescribed by Congress."
This is in the same section as Congress' authority over the army and navy.
Amendment V: ". . . except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia when in actual service . . . "
Finally, is the Supreme Court ever wrong? Yes and in big ways. It upheld slavery in the Dred Scott decision, and in Plessy v. Ferguson it enshrined segregation.
Question 1:
ReplyDeleteWhat is this silly woman's party affiliation? I am guessing D but I could be wrong.
Question 2:
Is she in a vulnerable district?
I hope this blatant disregard for our Laws and Rights goes viral across her district and neighboring districts.
Question 1:
ReplyDeleteWhat is this silly woman's party affiliation? I am guessing D but I could be wrong.
Bingo.
====================
Question 2:
Is she in a vulnerable district?
Orange and Chatham and she's been in for nine terms, but you never know.
======================
I hope this blatant disregard for our Laws and Rights goes viral across her district and neighboring districts.
Absolutely.
Here in Texas, Senators serve for four years. What is the term of office in NC?
Delete2 years.
DeleteClearly she knows whats best for us regardless of what the voters think and what that old piece of tattered paper says.
ReplyDeleteRecall?
Or get her to move to New York.
DeleteHer ignorance is utterly astounding. As always, let's take bits and pieces and put them together so they say what we WANT them to and not what they really say when read as a whole.
ReplyDeleteI. as a self educated in our history American citizen, could punch so many holes in her argument it wouldn't hold a drop of water if an entire dam broke.
Shame on you NC if you don't work to get her ousted with all your resources.
You have what you need in her own words right here.
USE IT!
Feigned ignorance:) and it's being spread
DeleteAt least it wasn't a form letter. She might be responsive to her constituents if they make enough noise.
ReplyDeleteMay be.
DeleteWhat would you expect from a democrat from Orange Co?
ReplyDeletelike most of the folks in that county she is probably educated
beyond her intellegence.
That's for sure.
DeleteMakin a list, checkin it twice....
ReplyDelete...who has been naughty or nice.........:)
DeleteLordChamp said it best! He spoke for me too!
ReplyDeleteShe is a useful idiot though. You can use her to set an example, showing her for the idiot she is. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to do this either, just a little commonsense.
Since she shows she has no commonsense we can deduce MANY things about her, including, she has NO morality, she is a revisionist, she is a humanist,(her claiming any church affiliation is only to cover her true faith.). In short she is anti-Christian. And I'm just getting started! Ya'll have at her.
Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
And I'm just getting started!
Delete:)
No wonder, she represents Chapel Hill!!
ReplyDeleteReally. OK here is a short story showing how far we have fallen. Every generation in my family has attended St. Mary's since its inception. When my mother went there she was almost kicked out because she walked across the street with her male cousin unescorted. I have the letters from my grandfather to her explaining the shenanigans he was going through to keep her in school.
DeleteYou surely mean the St. Mary's in Raleigh, noted for the legendary beauty of the girls, a couple of whom dated down and went out with me in the mid-50s.
DeleteLord, Brock, how the mighty have fallen! Where do people like this come from? How in God's name did they take over your State? They certainly aren't "natives"...
ReplyDeleteYup, she was born in MN and at 81 maybe she will retire, but then we'll just get a horse of a different color.
DeleteWhen is her term up? Maybe we can contribute to whoever her next opponent is.
ReplyDeletehbbill
Somewhere behind enemy lines,
Peoples Republik of Kalifornistan
Another two years, unfortunately.
Delete