Wednesday, June 26, 2013

NC: APD officer alleges coverup

Via NC Renegade


A city police lieutenant alleged Tuesday morning that police Chief William Anderson and a high-ranking captain tried to coerce him into making “false and misleading” statements regarding a car accident involving the chief’s son.

The public allegations, however, will not result in an SBI investigation into the chief's actions, District Attorney Ron Moore said. Lt. William Wilke met with the SBI and FBI on Tuesday night, Moore said, and told investigators he did not have anything to add to statements he made to the SBI earlier this year.

"Based on the two statements given several months ago and there being nothing new to add, there is no new investigation to be had."

Wilke, a 13-year veteran of the APD, held a press conference Tuesday morning at the office of his lawyer, George Hyler, and read a two-page statement about the events of March 9 and the following days.

Wilke said the chief and Capt. Stony Gonce attempted to have him “submit to a set of facts and circumstances regarding the accident involving (the chief’s) son that were clearly false and misleading.” Wilke was the scene commander the night of the wreck.

Also, Wilke alleged City Manager Gary Jackson and Deputy City Manager Jeff Richardson declined to act when Wilke raised his concerns about “false and misleading information” the police chief gave the Citizen-Times about the incident.

Cop rape case highlights life-endangering outrage of ‘Only Ones’ mentality

Via WRSA
A West Sacramento police officer allegedly raped at least six women while on duty, the Police Thugs blog reported Monday, referencing a Huffington Post article from February. Officer Sergio Alvarez, a five year veteran of the force, was initially placed on administrative leave and then fired and arrested after an investigation into the allegations.

More @ Examiner

Marriage predates government and civil authorities.

Via Cousin Joel

 http://tnvalleytalks.hoop.la/fileSendAction/fcType/0/fcOid/283751163786679485/filePointer/283751163786679496/fodoid/283751163786679493/imageType/LARGE/inlineImage/true/Marriage_OneMan_OneWoman-OUTLINE-1.jpg


 
With the release of its two rulings on same-sex “marriage” today, the United States Supreme Court has lost its legitimacy as an arbiter of the Constitution and the rule of law. Today marks the death of the Court’s legacy, because the decision on the Federal Defense of Marriage Act defies logic and is a pure invention of a handful of Justices.
 
As much as pro-homosexual activists will crow over today’s announcements, rest assured that the battle over marriage in America is far from over!  In fact, Liberty Counsel, joined by well over 200 Christian leaders representing tens of millions of Americans believers like you, is still boldly proclaiming “No court can make marriage into what it can never be”!
 
Please see my important update on the Supreme Court’s rulings and what we’re doing in response – Mat.
 
 
Today, the Supreme Court crossed the line and delegitimized its authority by striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). 
 
The Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) also released their opinions on California’s Proposition 8 state marriage amendment (Prop 8).  
 
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in his dissent on the DOMA ruling that the Court’s errors, both in explaining its jurisdiction and its decision, “spring from the same diseased root: an exalted conception of the role of this institution in America.”
 
Obviously disgusted with the majority’s hubris and its unfounded opinion, Scalia wrote…
 
”I promise you this: The only thing that will ‘confine’ the Court’s holding is its sense of what it can get away with.”
 
In other words, the Supreme Court will retain only the authority the People give it.  Its authority lies only in the fact that the People deem its decisions legitimate, and the DOMA decision clearly is not!
 
++How the Court ruled on DOMA.
 
Justice Kennedy, writing the DOMA decision under an Equal Protection rationale, strikes down Section 3 of DOMA, which defines marriage as one man and one woman for purposes of federal law and federal benefits, specifically joint federal tax returns, Social Security survivor benefits, and federal employee health insurance and medical benefits. 
 
But not at issue in this ruling are the other parts of DOMA, including the section that says states may define their own marriage policy and are not required to accept a sister state’s same-sex marriage. 
 
“DOMA singles out a class of persons deemed by a State entitled to recognition and protection to enhance their own liberty,” wrote Kennedy. 
 
++Justice Scalia’s dissent literally scolded the majority. 
 
Writing for the minority in the DOMA ruling, Justice Scalia wrote this in his scathing dissent…
 
“It is an assertion of judicial supremacy over the people’s Representatives in Congress and the Executive. It envisions a Supreme Court standing (or rather enthroned) at the apex of government, empowered to decide all constitutional questions, always and everywhere “primary” in its role. This image of the Court would have been unrecognizable to those who wrote and ratified our national charter.” 
 
Liberty Counsel concurs with Justice Scalia’s dissent, as do the more than 200 Christian leaders who have affirmed our powerful Marriage Solidarity Statement.  
 
++The Court’s ruling on Proposition 8.
 
Regarding the Prop 8 case, Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the 5-4 decision of the Court, dismissed the case on standing, meaning that the Court lacks jurisdiction to reach the merits because the Prop 8 Interveners lacked standing to litigate the case, after the California State Attorney General ceased defending it following the lower federal district court opinion. 
 
This means that the lower court decision governing the Northern District of California stands. Thus, only the decision striking down Prop 8 by the lower district court remains in effect. The remaining parts of California are unaffected. No doubt, litigation will ensue in the Southern and Middle Districts of California.
 
++The High Court is now engaged in raw judicial activism.
 
Justice O’Connor, writing in the early 1990’s case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Penn. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 864-869 (1992), candidly acknowledged: 
 
“The root of American governmental power is revealed most clearly in the instance of the power conferred by the Constitution upon the Judiciary of the United States and specifically upon this Court. As Americans of each succeeding generation are rightly told, the Court cannot buy support for its decisions by spending money and, except to a minor degree, it cannot independently coerce obedience to its decrees. 
 
The Court's power lies, rather, in its legitimacy, a product of substance and perception that shows itself in the people's acceptance of the Judiciary as fit to determine what the Nation's law means and to declare what it demands.
 
The underlying substance of this legitimacy is of course the warrant for the Court's decisions in the Constitution and the lesser sources of legal principle on which the Court draws… 
 
The Court must take care to speak and act in ways that allow people to accept its decisions on the terms the Court claims for them, as grounded truly in principle, not as compromises with social and political pressures having, as such, no bearing on the principled choices that the Court is obliged to make. 
 
Thus, the Court's legitimacy depends on making legally principled decisions under circumstances in which their principled character is sufficiently plausible to be accepted by the Nation.” 
 
++Neither the Supreme Court, nor any other court, can redefine marriage.
 
Marriage predates government and civil authorities. No civil authority, including the Supreme Court, has the authority to redefine marriage. Marriage was not created by religion or government and is ontologically a union of one man and one woman. For any Court or civil authority to think it has the authority to redefine marriage is the height of hubris. 
 
While today’s decision on DOMA did not redefine marriage, it has provided the foundation upon which to do so. Today’s decision is the equivalent of the 1972 contraception decision involving unmarried couples and the so-called right to privacy on which the 1973 abortion decision in Roe v. Wade was constructed. 
 
Today, the Supreme Court has damaged its image, lost its legitimacy, and set in motion considerable harm to society and to the State of the Union. 
 
++We stand for Marriage Solidarity! 
 
As you probably know, over 200 religious and civic leaders have signed the Marriage Solidarity Statement, including the leaders of many nationally known ministries representing millions of members. These are deeply concerned Americans who are taking a bold stand for marriage that transcends religious doctrine and boundaries.  
 
The Marriage Solidarity Statement declares that the Christian community will stand in solidarity on this vital issue. Redefining marriage is a line we cannot and will not cross!
 
++Join us today in signing the Marriage Solidarity Statement.  
 
This is an excellent way to raise a cry for moral sanity and help drown out the crowing and obscenities of the pro-homosexual minority that is celebrating today’s misguided Court rulings. 
 
We need every friend possible to join this historic effort! If you have yet to sign, please join us today:  
 
 
Watch for my further updates on these Supreme Court rulings. Our nation has lost its moral compass.  But we will never capitulate to the disordered view that marriage can unite what God says it cannot!  
 
By all means, let us take bold action and continue to pray for our nation.  Above all, don’t give up the battle for natural, God-ordained marriage in our society!  
 
God bless you,
 
Mat Staver, Chairman
Liberty Counsel Action
 
P.S. Based on today’s rulings, the United States Supreme Court has lost its legitimacy as an arbiter of the Constitution and the rule of law.
 
I am calling for unified prayer this week that God will bless our nation and that He will call forth a mighty movement among the American People to affirm and defend the God-ordained institution of marriage! 
 
Together, we are going on record as declaring that the institution of marriage is solely for the union of one man and one woman.  Please, for the sake of our nation, our communities, and your own family, join us!  
 
 
PPS. For those of you on Facebook, we now have a Marriage Solidarity page for you to “Like” and share with your social network. 
 
 

Excellent! My name is Paul Weston, and I am a racist

Via Conan The Cimmerian


Free homeschooling tools for HSLDA members

 
 
HSLDA families receive a full year membership FREE

Get the tools you need in order to simplify your homeschooling. At SchoolhouseTeachers.com, you'll find inspiring lessons and helpful resources to fill your teacher's toolbox. Gain full access to daily, weekly, and monthly assignments and fun activities for your students, from your littlest learners to your teens.

Take a look at all the educational materials that will become available to you and your children when you become a SchoolhouseTeachers.com member:
  • Lessons for academic subjects such as math, history, writing, science, and more!
  • Enrichment and elective courses that include Filmmaking, Beginning Guitar, French, Unit Studies, Lapbooking, Economics, Worldview, Logic, Mock Trial, and Career Exploration, with new subjects being added frequently.
  • Unique activities that can supplement your regular curriculum—or create your own curriculum by mixing and matching the daily spelling, history, and writing lessons, as well as book activities.
  • The Schoolhouse Library is stocked with copybooks, reading lists, homeschool encouragement, crafts, and reference materials.
Plus, homeschool resources that will inspire you and support your goals for your school:
  • Access the newest issue of The Old Schoolhouse® Magazine each month.
  • Access all digital back issues of The Old Schoolhouse® Magazine—19 issues to choose from, dating back to 2007.
  • Review, download, and enjoy monthly menu plans.
  • Discover a free TOS E-Book every month. Plus, add these Schoolhouse resources to your school library with free downloads during the first year of your membership: Thematic Units, Curiosity Files, WannaBes, and WeE-Books.
  • View recorded Schoolhouse Expo webinars, or listen to MP3 recordings from past and future Schoolhouse Expos.
  • Download all five of the TOS 2012–13 Schoolhouse Planners: The Schoolhouse Planner, Schoolhouse Special Learners Planner, Schoolhouse Primary Planner, Schoolhouse Intermediate Planner, and Schoolhouse High School Planner ($125 value).
More @ HSLDA

C.S.S. Rappahannock

 

Confederate Agent, Commander Matthew F. Maury sent Lieutenant William F. Carter off to seek out suitable ships to purchase and convert for Confederate use. Carter came up with a former British vessel, HMS Victor, now retired as a gunboat by the British and used as a dispatch ship. Although a handsomely modeled vessel of her day, Lt. Carter made note numerous defects before sanctioning her purchase at a much reduced price. The vessel was however designed to carry six, 24 pounders, all mounted forward of her twin funnels. She also had 350 horse power engine powered by six boilers and was judged to be fast under steam. The three, square rigged masts only carried single top sails as essentially the ‘Victor’ was designed as a steamship and not as a sailing vessel. Through the British agents, Gordon Coleman and Company, acting for Thomas Bold a successful offer was made to buy the ‘Victor’ from the Admiralty, stating the ship was to be used as a ‘China’ trader by her new owners.

Moored in Sheerness under the name ‘Scylla’ subsequent reports began reaching the British Government of suspicious activity on shore and aboard, coupled with rumours she was being fitted out as a blockade runner in contravention of the Neutrality Act then in force. As these reports intensified the Government decided to detain the vessel in port. Through an informant, the ‘Scylla’s’ Captain got wind of the order and on November 23rd 1863, sailed her for the English Channel and France

Amnesty: Senate phones nearly shut down -- switch to local offices this eve & Thurs. morn




Can't get through the Senate switchboard or individual Senate offices in Washington?

Call their offices back in the home states. Many of our members are saying they are getting through fine right now.

Here's the link to your two Senators (just click on the "contact information" link for each Senator).

www.numbersusa.com/content/my/congress/quickview

And here's where you can get the home and Washington numbers for every Senator you might wish to contact (especially after reading some of the info below).

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/congress/phone-numbers-and-mailing-addresses-memb.html

We're getting widescale reports from many of you who are phoning and phoning and not getting through in D.C. There are also signs that some Senators may have turned their D.C. phones off to keep from hearing from the people!

Overall, this is great news of a grassroots uprising that is sending great signals to the U.S. House to stay away from the S. 744 amnesty.

A number of you are pressing me to send out this one more alert today for a final hour or two of phoning -- especially for those of you in Central, Rocky and Pacific time zones where the local offices will be open awhile longer.

If the staff in the local offices says you should call D.C., tell them that the D.C. offices aren't answering their phones and you want these local staff to convey your message before the vote tomorrow on final cloture on the S. 744 amnesty bill.

3 new no votes on immigration

 https://www.numbersusa.com/images/redchart.gif

Chambliss, Chiesa, Enzi & Wicker joined our side in procedural cloture vote this afternoon.

Those of you in Georgia, New Jersey, Wyoming and Mississippi, call and give heartfelt thanks to these four who on an interim cloture vote this afternoon joined the Senators who had also voted on the anti-amnesty side on Monday. (The key cloture vote happens tomorrow).
That brings to 33 the Senators who have been willing to vote to just end the whole process on S. 744 before getting to a final vote. That is up from only 15 who would take that stand nine days ago.
More @ Numbers USA

Second IRS employee pleads the 5th at Oversight hearing

Via avordvet

 https://i1.ytimg.com/vi/CqAt5itCwUA/hqdefault.jpg

He needs a little advice on choice of ties.:)

What’s going on at the IRS?  Don’t expect answers from some of the people who work there.  A manager suspected of steering hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts to a friend became the second major figure to take the Fifth at a House Oversight Committee hearing into a widening range of malfeasance at the IRS:
A second IRS employee summoned to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee invoked the Fifth Amendment on Wednesday and refused to answer questions — a flashback to Lois Lerner, who did the same during a hearing on the agency’s scandal last month.
Gregory Roseman, who worked as a deputy director of acquisitions at the IRS, exercised his constitutional rights when Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) started interrogating him about panel findings that he helped a friend procure potentially $500 million worth of IRS contracts.
“On the advice of the counsel, I respectfully decline to answer any questions and invoke my Fifth Amendment privilege to remain silent,” Roseman said when Issa asked to whom he reported at the IRS.
Issa continued: “Mr. Roseman, when did you first become aware of a company called Strong Castle Inc.?”
Roseman, who has been removed from his position pending the outcome of an inspector general investigation, repeated his first statement.

More @ Hot Air

DOJ Defunds At-Risk Youth Programs over "God" Reference

Via WiscoDave

 Julian Whittington Campaign - Bossier City, Louisiana

A Louisiana lawman is livid over the federal government’s decision to cut off funds for two programs to help troubled young people -- all, he says, because he refused to sign a pledge to bar prayer or any mention of God at their meetings.

Julian Whittington, the sheriff of Bossier Parish, Louisiana, told Fox News that the Department of Justice Office of Civil Rights de-funded $30,000 for their Young Marines chapter as well as a youth diversion program. Federal officials objected to a voluntary student-led prayer in the department’s youth diversion program and an oath recited by the Young Marines that mentions God, according to Whittington, who blasted what he considers the government’s “aggression and infringement of our religious freedoms.”

“We were informed that these are unacceptable inherently religious activities and the Department of Justice would not be able to fund the programs if it continued,” Whittington told Fox News. “They wanted a letter from me stating that I would no longer have voluntary prayer and I would also have to remove 'God' from the Young Marine’s oath.”

The DOJ and the Office of Civil Rights are aware of the controversy but did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Fox News obtained an email written by an attorney for the DOJ’s Office of Civil Rights raised questions about references to God and church along with the phrase “love of God.” The attorney also raised questions about one of the five elements of the Young Marines Creed – “Keep myself clean in mind by attending the church of my faith.”

The attorney advised that DOJ rules prohibit “funding on inherently religious activities, such as prayer, religious instruction and proselytization.

“And any religious activities must be kept separate in time or location from DOJ-funded activities,” the attorney wrote.

The sheriff was told he would not be given any money unless he wrote a letter pledging not to pray or use the word “God.”

“I flat said, ‘It’s not going to happen,’” he said. “Enough is enough. This is the United States of America -- and the idea that the mere mention of God or voluntary prayer is prohibited is ridiculous.”

More @ Townhall