Monday, June 30, 2014

Sorry, but the Socialists are winning this one

 https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUTYuDOLC6nY7D2rdax7T3XiXtzkne4NtteFPuA3taOJCrKDhyG87my35xcaxd_U5PoP0G2uWN3iLYFc9_xC7I7fsVmEIp_LpdivExsR8A8EbBZoMS-q12vaozIk_e5Q9hh0WqGy_XWvMG/s1600/Brain_Socialist_550.gif
As a small business owner of a manufacturing company with less than 50 employees I finally have to admit that whether I like it or not the Socialists are going to win the battle for medical care. The small win on the mandate by Hobby Lobby brings me no solace. Early last fall when it was time for us to renew our policy we managed to keep our employee insurance plan in place with an increase no where near the huge predicted cost increase I was expecting. Our insurance broker warned at that time that the major suppliers of insurance were not passing on huge increases at that time because they were holding their cards close to their vest waiting and watching what was going to happen with the implementation of Obama care and what if any the push back was going to be.

Well this year it is different and it looks like the cards are going to be on the table. Although our renewal date is not until end of September June is usually the time we start to review where we are and what we are going to do come October first. After several meetings with our broker it seems our choices are quite limited. We can keep our current insurance carrier and policy and take the expected increase which they are predicting to be in the range of 35 to 60% because there is a move in the legislature to allow companies to keep what they currently have but not to cap cost increases. We can move to a company plan on the "exchange" that government has sanctioned or we can just drop company coverage and get out of the insurance business entirely.

To try and keep our current insurance as it is if it is so allowed which is still unclear would mean a cost increase the company could not bear. Our broker believes the 45-60% increase even if we can keep it is likely. To try and keep it and pass the even half the cost of the costs onto our employees is a cost they cannot bear. To take less of a cost increase and offer a plan with fewer benefits from what the government offers is not an option. Therefore the only choice we have is to drop insurance entirely for our employees.

Yeah I know the Socialists win and they get to point to greedy business owners for not stepping up and taking care of their employees. Good thing for employees that the government is there to look out for them and take care of them. We have decided to cap our costs and take what the company now pays towards insurance and do a universal hourly pay increase to every employee. As we paid 85% of our employees coverage they will all see a fairly substantial initial pay increase. We are paying that out to every employee even the few who did not participate in our insurance program. But then we are out of the insurance business.

Our insurance broker will meet with every one of our employees at our facility on company time and help walk them through their options for insurance and get them signed up well before our policy lapses as of October first. Sounds like a fair and reasonable alternative plan except for the fact that it still sticks in my craw and makes me mad every time I go over what seems to be the only logical path for the company to take. As much as I replay it in my mind I cannot come up with a better alternative.

I know what bothers me most and that is that the Socialists have won this one. Many other small businesses are in the same boat we are. Some have offered up that everything will be fine and my employees will be able to get coverage from qualified insurance companies through the government exchange and maybe that is so for the first year or two but even our insurance broker agrees that it will not last and insurance costs will continue to sky rocket and fewer services will be offered. In private and off the record they admit that even the big insurance companies admit that the system is designed to fail and will collapse. The big insurance companies have seen the writing on the wall and know the end is in sight for them so they are out to make all the money they can with new people being pushed onto the insurance roles. They know that the system is designed to collapse and lead to a single payer government program so make the money while you can. Besides the government has given the insurance companies a promise to subsidize them if all the extra benefits they have had to promise drops their bottom line so what do they have to lose.

Okay I have to just get over it and move on. If any of you see a better alternative path for my company to take just post it or PM me. And to the Socialists I have only two things to say. First you didn't build it we did. Second as FFDP said in Way of the Fist, "you might win one battle, but know this we'll win the f**kin war...

50 Years of Mischief: The Triumph and Trashing of the Civil Rights Act

 https://afth.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/census-race-300x225.jpg

July 2 marks the 50th anniversary of the most famous Civil Rights Act in U.S history. Passed after the longest debate in congressional history, the Civil Rights Act (CRA) promised to secure justice for all regardless of race, color, creed, sex, or national origin. As I wrote in Race and Liberty: The Essential Reader, the law “was understood to mean ‘colorblindness’ by nearly every observer at the time.” The plain meaning of the act might be summed up as: “Nondiscrimination. Period.”

Supporters of the Civil Rights Act did everything in their power to make the language plain, clear and strong: one key clause stated:

“Nothing contained in this title shall be interpreted to require any employer . . . to grant preferential treatment to any individual or to any group because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin . . . .”
A chief sponsor of the law, Senator Hubert Humphrey (D-MN), rejected the “bugaboo” of preferences or quotas by stating “If the senator [opposing the act] can find . . . any language which provides that an employer will have to hire on the basis of percentage or quota related to color, race, religion, or national origin, I will start eating the pages one after another, because it is not in there.”

In 1964, opponents predicted that a governmental push for racial outcomes was bound to occur, regardless of the plain language of the act. After all, the principle of a government limited by respect for individual liberty had always been flouted by those in power—including segregationist opponents of the law who now acted “shocked! shocked!” that the government might treat individuals differently based on race. This was sheer hypocrisy coming from those who defended racial discrimination by state governments.

Yet, hypocrisy aside, fifty years experience has shown that the CRA did lead, almost immediately, to the bureaucratic creation of racial categories (“check boxes”) used to further discriminatory treatment by a government seeking pre-determined outcomes in hiring, college admissions, contracting, voting, and much more.

50 VA hospital workers claim retaliation for blowing whistle on the horrors they saw

Via LH

 

When Valerie Riviello, a nurse at a Veterans Affairs facility in New York, saw the clinic restrain a sexual assault survivor to a bed for seven consecutive hours, she released the woman.

The next day, Ms. Riviello said, she was removed from her post as senior nurse manager and given a full-time desk job that prohibited her from contact with patients. She eventually was reprimanded and is facing a 30-day unpaid suspension for releasing the woman.

More with video @ The Washington Times

Action, Please:NC: SB594, Pittman Amendment Don't Sellout Gun Owners

 
 Please copy and paste below.  Can't believe Pat McElraft (Carteret, Jones, traitor signed on.
 
Dear Representative:

I am outraged that the House failed to pass the Pittman Amendment to SB 594, “Omnibus Justice Amendments” which would have protected legally licensed Concealed Carry holders from becoming felons because of simple mistakes. I understand that there may be one last chance to correct this and I EXPECT YOU TO DO SO. I understand that this was a recorded vote and I will REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER.

There are other ways of preventing gang violence than criminalizing potential mistakes by those I love. Such legal language is simply unacceptable and will not be forgotten. Make every effort under your power to stop this from happening. Anything less will be remembered at the polls in November.

Sincerely,
Brock Townsend



 Dean.Arp@ncleg.net,
 Marilyn.Avila@ncleg.net,
 John.Bell@ncleg.net,
 Hugh.Blackwell@ncleg.net,
 John.Blust@ncleg.net,
 Jamie.Boles@ncleg.net,
 "Rep. Robert Brawley" ,
 Bill.Brawley@ncleg.net,
 Mark.Brody@ncleg.net,
 Brian.Brown@ncleg.net,
 "Rep. Rayne Brown" ,
 Rob.Bryan@ncleg.net,
 Dana.Bumgardner@ncleg.net,
 Justin.Burr@ncleg.net,
 Rick.Catlin@ncleg.net,
 George.Cleveland@ncleg.net,
 Jeff.Collins@ncleg.net,
 Debra.Conrad@ncleg.net,
 Leo.Daughtry@ncleg.net,
 Ted.Davis@ncleg.net,
 Jimmy.Dixon@ncleg.net,
 Josh.Dobson@ncleg.net,
 Jerry.Dockham@ncleg.net,
 Nelson.Dollar@ncleg.net,
 Jeffrey.Elmore@ncleg.net,
 John.Faircloth@ncleg.net,
 Carl.Ford@ncleg.net,
 Jim.Fulghum@ncleg.net,
 Mike.Hager@ncleg.net,
 Jon.Hardister@ncleg.net,
 Kelly.Hastings@ncleg.net,
 Mark.Hollo@ncleg.net,
 Bryan.Holloway@ncleg.net,
 Craig.Horn@ncleg.net,
 Julia.Howard@ncleg.net,
 Pat.Hurley@ncleg.net,
 Frank.Iler@ncleg.net,
 Charles.Jeter@ncleg.net,
 Linda.Johnson2@ncleg.net,
 Bert.Jones@ncleg.net,
 Jonathan.Jordan@ncleg.net,
 Donny.Lambeth@ncleg.net,
 James.Langdon@ncleg.net,
 David.Lewis@ncleg.net,
 Chris.Malone@ncleg.net,
 Susan.Martin@ncleg.net,
 Pat.McElraft@ncleg.net,
 Chuck.McGrady@ncleg.net,
 Allen.McNeill@ncleg.net,
 Chris.Millis@ncleg.net,
 Tim.Moffitt@ncleg.net,
 Tim.Moore@ncleg.net,
 Tom.Murry@ncleg.net,
 Michele.Presnell@ncleg.net,
 Nathan.Ramsey@ncleg.net,
 Dennis.Riddell@ncleg.net,
 Stephen.Ross@ncleg.net,
 Jason.Saine@ncleg.net,
 Ruth.Samuelson@ncleg.net,
 Jacqueline.Schaffer@ncleg.net,
 Mitchell.Setzer@ncleg.net,
 Phil.Shepard@ncleg.net,
 Michael.Speciale@ncleg.net,
 Paul.Stam@ncleg.net,
 Edgar.Starnes@ncleg.net,
 Bob.Steinburg@ncleg.net,
 Sarah.Stevens@ncleg.net,
 Michael.Stone@ncleg.net,
 John.Szoka@ncleg.net,
 Thom.Tillis@ncleg.net,
 "Rep. John Torbett" ,
 Rena.Turner@ncleg.net,
 Harry.Warren@ncleg.net,
 Andy.Wells@ncleg.net,
 Roger.West@ncleg.net,
 Chris.Whitmire@ncleg.net,
 Alma.Adams@ncleg.net,
 Kelly.Alexander@ncleg.net,
 Nathan.Baskerville@ncleg.net,
 Larry.Bell@ncleg.net,
 Marcus.Brandon@ncleg.net,
 William.Brisson@ncleg.net,
 Becky.Carney@ncleg.net,
 Tricia.Cotham@ncleg.net,
 Carla.Cunningham@ncleg.net,
 Beverly.Earle@ncleg.net,
 Jean.Farmer-Butterfield@ncleg.net,
 Susan.Fisher@ncleg.net,
 Elmer.Floyd@ncleg.net,
 Valerie.Foushee@ncleg.net,
 Rosa.Gill@ncleg.net,
 Rick.Glazier@ncleg.net,
 Ken.Goodman@ncleg.net,
 Charles.Graham@ncleg.net,
 George.Graham@ncleg.net,
 Duane.Hall@ncleg.net,
 Larry.Hall@ncleg.net,
 Susi.Hamilton@ncleg.net,
 Edward.Hanes@ncleg.net,
 Pricey.Harrison@ncleg.net,
 Yvonne.Holley@ncleg.net,
 Verla.Insko@ncleg.net,
 Darren.Jackson@ncleg.net,
 Marvin.Lucas@ncleg.net,
 Paul.Luebke@ncleg.net,
 Deb.McManus@ncleg.net,
 Mickey.Michaux@ncleg.net,
 Annie.Mobley@ncleg.net,
 Rodney Moore ,
 Garland.Pierce@ncleg.net,
 Joe.Queen@ncleg.net,
 Bobbie.Richardson@ncleg.net,
 Deborah.Ross@ncleg.net,
 Evelyn.Terry@ncleg.net,
 Paul.Tine@ncleg.net,
 Joe.Tolson@ncleg.net,
 Ken.Waddell@ncleg.net,
 Winkie.Wilkins@ncleg.net,
 Michael.Wray@ncleg.net

3 Months Until 6th NC PATCON October 1st - 6th 2014

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkyLdUeyoet0uPzQA0JuHRku1jvv9FYaR3P0CukoYBxYpgZItQkgDfb9IFnDGsWzWXHdHl4GEj_hmxoyO61YnyaqtE5YQOk60ObbKECkfinvfmwmpPHRcJy2pul5cYPHVXFVOiXNfpbIjs/s1600/SANY0434.JPG

"........Common Core national standards… you’re looking at a complete distortion of civic education as we know it in America.”

Via avordvet 

 http://volusiacountyrepublicans.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/NO-to-Common-Core-Featured.jpg

A classroom resource provided by a group founded by three lead writers of the Common Core State Standards teaches 8th graders as fact that the U.S. Constitution is a "living document" and that the nation's founders only considered white males with property as persons under the law.
But leading constitutional scholars challenge both assertions.

More @ CNS News

Family Saved When Well-Trained Gun Cuts Down Murderous Home Invader

 DEFAULT_CRIME

A murderous thug broke into a Chino Hills home looking for his ex-girfriend, then attacked her father with a knife, stabbing him repeatedly.

The criminal didn’t count on his victim being armed:

A Chino Hills homeowner shot and wounded an intruder — his daughter’s ex-boyfriend — moments after the man repeatedly stabbed him, sheriff’s officials say.

More @ Bearing Arms

Robbed gas-station store puts magical “no gun” sign on door

 Keith's Superstore no gun sign

I would bet $10 the owner of this gas-station store is a Democrat because only Democrats believe in word magic and only Democrats can be this stupid.

On March 19, 2014, a Mississippi concealed weapons permit (CWP) holder, a white male in his 30s, walked into Keith’s Superstore — a convenience store attached to a Chevron gas station at 7843 Highway 11 in Lumberton, MS.

Two Out of Three American Youth Unfit for Military

 http://beforeitsnews.com/mediadrop/uploads/2014/10/04bc1abfe620f1c7b0f6a080c46e08390152ad4b.jpg

The U.S. military estimates that roughly two thirds of today's youth are ineligible to serve due to a variety of physical, behavioral, and educational issues. Military hopefuls can be deemed unfit for service due to tattoos, felony convictions, low scores on intelligence tests, and drug use, among other reasons.
The most common reason recruits are disqualified is obesity. Child and adolescent obesity rates have skyrocketed in the past 30 years, and in some states nearly one out of five high schoolers is considered to be obese.

The military's new tattoo standards have also put a hamper on some recruits. The military has banned tattoos on the hand, forearm, calf, and above the neck. In most states, it is illegal to tattoo someone under the age of 18 unless a parent has given consent or is present.

Additionally, about a quarter of high school graduates cannot pass the Armed Forces Qualification Test, meaning that they lack even basic mathematics and reading skills needed to join the military. A recruit scoring below the tenth percentile on the AFQT is "generally" not permitted to join the military.

More @ Townhall

Another Rapist for Gun Control

 Convicted Felon and alleged CeaseFire Chicago rapist Richard Hernandez.

The only people that benefit from gun control are corrupt governments and criminals, but I repeat myself:

On the streets, Richard Hernandez was supposed to stop violence as an “interrupter” in the celebrated CeaseFire program.

But Chicago cops have another name for him: rapist.

Hernandez faces 36 counts charging him with sexually assaulting and kidnapping a teenage girl while he worked for the program, the Chicago Sun-Times has learned. He’s among at least nine employees of the anti-violence program to face serious criminal charges in recent years.

More @ Bearing Arms