Back
in early July 2009, political prostitutes on the Senate Judiciary Committee
began confirmation hearings for a politically correct socialist, Sonia
Sotomayor, to the U.S. Supreme Court. Having the correct female parts
and ethnicity (Hispanic), she was a shoe-in regardless of how unqualified
for the job. At that time, Dr. Richard Cordero contacted me. Dr. Cordero
is an attorney who practices law in New York and was not only very familiar
with Sotomayor, his research proves little Sonia concealed her assets
and is guilty of tax evasion and perjury. I immediately began reading
his evidence; it took a couple of days. Not speculation, but hundreds
of pages of documents.
Gutless
Republicans like Sen. Jeff Sessions refused to even contact Dr. Cordero.
It's not as if he didn't know about Dr. Cordero's evidence, many of us
made sure he did. Sessions and his colleagues brushed it off and proceeded
with the sham confirmation hearings.
Back
then I wrote two columns exposing this [1],
[2],
yet strangely, few people seemed interested or concerned. Certainly not
the liars for hire in the "mainstream" media or even the mis-named
"fair and balanced" FOX News. Not even some of the news web
sites one would think would have jumped on this scandal. Nothing. Here
is an individual who could have not only derailed Sotomayor's nomination,
but force a criminal investigation into her activities as well as other
judges in New York. Well, there was a bit of sniffing going on, but just
like their refusal to fully investigate the impostor president back in
2007 & 2008, the NY Times, Washington Post and Politico,
did not follow through on Sotomayor. Heaven forbid they would actually
investigate such a politically correct nominee! Why, it might bring backlash
from minority groups and we can't have that in America. Better to let
the mobs take control.
Now
to the meat of the issue from Dr. Richard Cordero who is a doctor
of law with a Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in England; a Master
of Business Administration from the University of Michigan; and a law
degree from La Sorbonne in Paris:
More @ News With Views
Fascinating to me is the common thread running between this post and your prior one ("Did Obama Hack the 2008 Election?"). McCain had evidence of ballot stuffing--but chose to do nothing. Sessions et al had evidence of tax evasion and perjury on the part of High Court nominee Sotomayor--but chose to do nothing. Fascinating--and perplexing. Why?!
ReplyDeleteLord only knows. I certainly don't.
ReplyDelete