NYT: Americans With Assault Rifles Should 'Give Them Up For The Good Of Their Fellow Citizens'
Via
avordvet
It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally
purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed
and efficiency. (So, having ones which kill slower and with more agony would do, correct?) These are weapons of war, barely modified 
and
deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even
insurrection. ( I agree with the latter.) America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims
and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most
basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday.
They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be
clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of
terrorism.
It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second
Amendment. No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation. (We don't need the 2nd, we have a Natural Right) Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles
used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed
for civilian ownership. (Good luck) It is possible to define those guns in a
clear and effective way and, yes, it would require Americans who own
those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow
citizens.
Obviously, the NYT staff has no idea what the term "semi-automatic" means. Weapons-of-War or machine guns, i.e. Full-automatic rifles have been banned since 1934.
ReplyDeleteWithout their laborious, expensive application process.
DeleteThe NYT can kiss my arse. Specifically the writer of that insipid tripe of an article.
ReplyDeleteReally.
DeleteThat the New York Slimes.....er...Times, would have me give up some thing for my own or any one else's good is all the more reason why I should do just the opposite. The NYT ought to realize that for the most part nobody cares what they have to say on just about any topic.
ReplyDeleteThe NYT ought to realize that for the most part nobody cares what they have to say on just about any topic.
DeleteExcept their Left-Of-Lenin followers.
If they insist, I willing to donate some of the bullets I have, and they won't even need to bring a bullet puller to get them.
ReplyDeleteCentral Alabamaian
Now that will work!
DeleteI suppose it's good I don't live near an area where there are NYT boxes.
ReplyDeleteI'd get arrested for vandalism, painting Molon Labe on their boxes.
:) I don't believe I have ever seen one, fortunately.
Delete"....designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency."
ReplyDeleteWith ball-type ammunition?...Really?
If the effects of ignorance could be measured by the destructive force of a nuclear weapon, one of these idiots would be able to wipe a whole continent off the face of the earth.
Central Alabamaian
If the effects of ignorance could be measured by the destructive force of a nuclear weapon, one of these idiots would be able to wipe a whole continent off the face of the earth.
DeleteYou got it!
If #GOP refuses 2 stop terrorists from buying guns,reduce #GunViolence & protect Americans- House D's will make them
ReplyDeleteGood luck, Pussy II.
===================
Dems try to force vote on ‘no-fly’ list gun limits
The push is part of a larger messaging campaign the party will deploy this week
Children playing in sandboxes. Nothing you pass will make one iota of a difference to men who will simply ignore them. You keep pushing and y'all will regret the outcome. Thanks.