On issues like Islam and immigration control especially but also on other issues, I keep asking myself two questions about all the candidates.
1. Do they understand the problem or threat?
2. Will they actually do anything about the problem or threat?
We have a tendency to elect leaders who are good public relations representatives and smooth talkers but are not leaders who can motivate people to anticipate and solve problems, and get things done within a Constitutional and democratic framework. Here is Dr. Sewell's article."
***********************
**************************************
Dated
Dated
The army called this test "GT" around 1969, if you scored 136 or higher before 1978, Mensa will accept the result as proof of being in the 98th percentile. (I've often wondered if this is true, since I scored a 136 in 1966, (22 YO) USARV Headquarters, Long Binh, RVN but only an actual IQ of 118 in 1956 (12 YO) Can an IQ increase at all and if so, that much in 10 years? I've never found a definitive answer.)
**********************************
The most well known high IQ society is Mensa. To join Mensa one must score in the top 2% of
a standardized IQ test. That really
isn’t all that outstanding. One out of
50 people have IQs high enough to join Mensa.
Numerical IQ scores are not an accurate indicator of
intelligence. For instance a score of 72
on the U.S. Navy GCT test is about equal to score of 150 on the WAIS (Wechsler
Adult Intelligence Scale). Percentile IQ
scores are a more informative measurement.
Way back during the 2004 presidential election I
wrote an article that shook up the major news networks and
the New York Times. I was able to
document that George Bush had a higher IQ score and better grades than John
Kerry. I belong to one of those high IQ
societies, and I am a psychotherapist, so I have a credible background to
evaluate Mr. Trump, even though my opinions are speculative.
Please keep in mind that IQ is a measure of intellect not
character. I will comment on Donald
Trump’s character later in this article.
More @ The Steady Drip
The fallacy in this "Smart people are needed in government" nonsense should be apparent from history, especially to anyone concerned with strict observance of the Constitution.
ReplyDeleteWhat Americans should seek in their public officials is men who can understand the duties and limitations of their offices, and will cleave to them unswervingly.
DeleteGood piece and well stated.
"I think we need somebody pretty smart to manage a Republic of 320 million people with a complex economy $18 trillion..."
ReplyDeleteThat's not their job. We don't hire a president to manage US. We hire him to manage the government.
--Generic
Articles like this really hurt the credibility of an otherwise informative blog.
ReplyDeleteWell worth my read.
Delete