Via comment by
indyjonesouthere on
North Carolina sues U.S. Justice Department in def... “Actually North Carolina has a good case. Rawls at Survivalblog had a
small piece on Interposition doctrine at the end of todays post. Its
under Jims quote of the day and well worth reading."
The doctrine that a state, in the exercise of its sovereignty, may
reject a mandate of the federal government deemed to be unconstitutional
or to exceed the powers delegated to the federal government. The
concept is based on the 10th Amendment of the Constitution of the United
States reserving to the states powers not delegated to the United
States. Historically, the doctrine emanated from Chisholm v. Georgia, 2
Dallas 419, wherein the state of Georgia, when sued in the Supreme Court
by a private citizen of another state, entered a remonstrance and
declined to recognize the court’s jurisdiction. Amendment 11 validated
Georgia’s position. Implementation of the doctrine may be peaceable, as
by resolution, remonstrance or legislation, or may proceed ultimately to
nullification with forcible resistance.” –
Black’s Law Dictionary
This is BS. The US gov is nothing more than an evil corporation. North Carolina's ruling falls under States
ReplyDeleteRights just like gay marriage, abortion, 14th Amendment, the
right to secede and I would like to know what else has been
stolen from the states. It is always the blackmail; if a
school does not have any 'minorities' in the little school,
the school gets no fed money even though fed money comes
from the states. That ten miles square sure has grown.
Thieves, Maryland and Virginia should take back their land.
Delete