Properly vetting would-be immigrants’ religious beliefs is not only legal — it would be wise and prudent. Of all the ignorant pronouncements in the 2016 presidential campaign, the dumbest may be that the Constitution forbids a “religious test” in the vetting of immigrants. Monotonously repeated in political speeches and talking-head blather, this claim is heedless of the Islamic doctrinal roots on which foreign-born Islamists and the jihadists they breed base their anti-Americanism. It is also dead wrong.
The clause said to be the source of this drivel is found in Article VI.
As you’ll no doubt be shocked to learn, it has utterly nothing to do
with immigration. The clause states, “no religious Test shall ever be
required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the
United States” (emphasis added). On its face, the provision is not only
inapplicable to immigrants at large, let alone aliens who would like to
be immigrants; it does not even apply to the general public. It is
strictly limited to public officials — specifically to their fitness to
serve in government positions.
More @ NRO
What, leftists lie? Say it ain't so Joe!
ReplyDeleteTruth is not in collectivist's vocabulary.
DeleteThe ONLY way to "properly vet" Islamic terrorist and THEY ARE ALL TERRORIST. Is rule .308 subsections 5.56 and .311. Nerve gas, Nukes and napalm would also be helpful in sorting them out.--Ray
ReplyDeleteAgreed.
Delete