Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only
one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it
is a complicated process. BillyPenn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal
and present a “prima facie case” showing that voter fraud took place.
While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than “beyond
reasonable doubt,” it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in
court that fraud was “probable.” This is going to be very difficult
given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say
there is no proof of hacking or fraud.
More @ Inquisitr
Having to file in court
ReplyDeletewon't make any difference.
Remember what causes
"treason to prosper."
The rule of law is long since dead
in America.
A wholly treasonous and criminal
uniparty dictatorship resides
in the District of C.
What about this truth are people still
missing?
They do whatever the fuck
they desire, as they are unopposed.
thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/steins-recount-may-prevent-wi-pa-mi-votes-counted-electoral-college/
cav med
Yes and I have that. Thanks.
Deletehttps://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2016/11/steins-recount-may-prevent-wi-pa-mi.html
I think it is going to get messy, especially if it gets to the point where the congress has to decide to accept those electors votes. We know Ryan is a traitor and will bow to the democrats. Keep your antenna up
ReplyDeleteWe don't need him or Haley having anything to do with the administration.
Deletehttp://www.city-journal.org/html/democrats-not-trump-racialize-our-politics-14871.html
ReplyDeletehttp://www.returnofkings.com/100887/12-reasons-why-liberals-and-progressives-will-always-be-losers
Thanks and two great sites, especially the former.
Delete