You gotta love it when a cowardly POS uses a disclaimer like, “I don’t agree with this, but this is how I’d do it.”. Then he says, “I’d assemble armed resistance brigades”.
HA ROFLMAO! I hate to tell you Snowflake, but you picked the wrong side of that comflict to even consider it an “armed” anything. “Sign carriers”, yes…..you guys have the lock on that. Trump supporters (foremost of which would be Vets and LEO’s in that scenario) would be the only “armed” and tactically proficient group in that one slice shit sandwich. But hey, thanks for giving Trump supporters a reason to load ALL the mags………
More @ Mason Dixon Tactical
Yeah, that's pretty funny wanting an armed revolt by snowflakes at each state capitol that will cast electoral votes for Trump. They pee themselves if you even have a cross word with them............
ReplyDeleteHilarious.
DeleteTypical. "I'd assemble an armed resistance Brigade".
ReplyDeleteIn other words, he would community organize other people to go fight for him. Pathetic.
Typical liberal.
DeleteSounds a lot like, "I don't approve of rape and pillage, but here is a schedule of when all the police will be out of town". If it can be shown that anyone acted on this advice after reading it, The author is absolutely a conspirator and accomplice.
ReplyDeleteI work in the Pentagon. I know where the security weaknesses are. You can tell I don't approve of people attacking the Pentagon because I don't write ideas on the Internet telling them how to do it.
If it can be shown that anyone acted on this advice after reading it, The author is absolutely a conspirator and accomplice.
DeleteAgreed. I posted a story on a man who was attempting to take a cross down complete with his info and requesting everyone contact him. Well, his lawyer contacted. me! :)
What these urban hipster special snowflakes do not have the slightest clue about is they would be nothing more than a live fire training practice for those, like the gentleman pictured above, who are vets. As a service to the special snowflakes, it would be in their best interest (and a lot healthier) for them to do their militia fantasies via the computer games. Role playing a badass super trooper on Call to Duty or Halo is about all they are qualified for. They also need to be reminded that when you play militia in the real world, there are no time outs, no "safe spaces" and your second play participation trophy is a body bag. In addition to loading ALL the mags, they are giving a cause to buy all those other wish list items for when times get "interesting".
ReplyDeletewhen you play militia in the real world, there are no time outs, no "safe spaces" and your second play participation trophy is a body bag
Delete:)
Might just be me, but I'm not terrified of rainbows and unicorns. Hell, just tell a Polish or blond joke and they'd all run for a safe-space.
ReplyDeleteBadger
just tell a Polish or blond joke and they'd all run for a safe-space.
Delete:)
If they stick with an occasional paintball game they will likely live...otherwise shit quickly gets over their head if they go any further. indyjonesouthere
ReplyDeleteHa!
DeleteEven I know you have to drill with a militia to be worth anything, unless the guy's wanting to be some sort of evil sniper who kills innocents, which is just a horrible thing.
ReplyDeleteI somewhat agree that not just anyone should have a gun. Ideally you want only those with training in a local militia to be deserving of anything much more than a shotgun (eg. for ducks). "Liberals" running about with military hardware is kinda scary.
In Switzerland, you first train with the military; only then you're given a gun. And I think Switzerland prefers that you take it, though maybe I heard wrong when I was there. Apparently they're still set up to defend from the Germans, and one day it might be the EU they really have to defend against.
Thanks, but I don't think you can differentiate between those you think can have a gun and those who you think shouldn't.
DeleteIn the US I'm for maximum individual gun rights, but in a different society decentralised militias might function better.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was good the hunter education course I took years ago. The US is a barbaric failed state, but perhaps something more could be possible in a civilised society.
Anyway, I mostly just wanted to praise militias. I think they perform a wonderful service, not only as defence and a balance of power but also in offering training. The US likes to demonise them, but they're generally wonderful. And militias were originally a core part of American society.
It's the lone gunmen, or lone few gunmen, who are disconnected from society who tend to be a threat. Militias though you think of as part of the community.
Not my area of expertise. I just like ideals, and I like stating problems even if there's no solution. A concern for me is when "conservatives" go too far in dogmatism. Most every action, most every policy choice, has potential positives and negatives.
Good thoughts and thanks.
Delete