And make sure that we condemn them as well.
From time to time over the years, the eminent historian Daniel Pipes has
lamented that treason, not just as a crime but as a concept, appears
defunct in the West. The question of bringing treason charges against
jihadists has been raised from time to time. Often its very asking
proves Dr. Pipes’s point: Most radical Islamic terrorists are not
American citizens; as to them, treason is not a cognizable offense
because traitorous conduct is central to the crime.
Even against American jihadists, a treason charge is of dubious
usefulness. The 1996 overhaul of federal counterterrorism law codified
crimes tailored to terrorism that are easier to prove than treason. The
aim of an indictment in a national-security case should be the surest
route to the severest sentence. The point is not to teach a civics
lesson, regrettable as our education system’s default has been in that
regard.
Yet what is true of treason is not true of sedition. There are charges
to bring against those who would destroy our society. They should be
brought. Case in point: the University of California at Berkeley.
More @ NRO
Great observation
ReplyDeleteYes,,indeedy, :)
Delete