SHFTPLan reports:
According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:]
In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history.
And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.
More @ The Gateway Pundit
I have heard that about NASA reports--the data is tailored to fit global warming.
ReplyDeleteIf the government pays you, you come up with what they want.
DeleteI am afraid you are right.
ReplyDelete:):(
Delete