Thanks to the acoustic forensic analysis I’ve publicly posted, the FBI now knows there was a second shooter at the Las Vegas massacre. The math is undeniable, and the acoustic analysis proves the existence of a second shooter. (See the video summary below.)
So why is the FBI now deleting all evidence of a second shooter? According to The Daily Sheeple:
More @ Natural News
Brock, thanks for posting this link. I found it useful and credible. Unlike most of the 'information' (or lack thereof) being 'produced' by the FBI/LV sheriff pressers.
ReplyDeleteThe shorter vid is logical and makes sense. I don't have the background to criticize/refute his logic/methodology. But he is upfront about his sources. Methodology & calculations.
He answered any questions I had as he moved thru his presentation. The only one not addressed is his use of 55g ammo in his calculations. Assumption on his part or has that 'fact' been verified by "Law enforcement"?
I enjoy your blog. Keep up the good work.
Assumption on his part or has that 'fact' been verified by "Law enforcement"?
DeleteI really don't know and thanks.
It is clear the FBI cannot be trusted. Citizens handed their cell phones and cameras to the FBI, so they could extract evidence. Only to discover, the FBI scrubbed all the photos and videos from their devices, when they were returned. I wonder if anyone gave their permission for the FBI, to erase private photos and videos? The lesson is, give NOTHING you want to the FBI. They cannot be trusted.
ReplyDeleteBadger
I read that it is customary for them to do this in a felony case. Do you know anymore?
DeleteCustomary or not, as this news spreads, the FBI will find fewer and fewer people that voluntarily turn over their cell phones and cameras. I did see this…
DeleteFBI asks for videos, photos of shooting
The Las Vegas FBI took to Twitter to ask for digital evidence.
@FBILasVegas is asking anyone with videos or photos from the 10/1/17 Las Vegas shooting to please call 1-800-CALLFBI (255-5324)
— FBI Las Vegas (@FBILasVegas) October 2, 2017
In this day and age, where most everyone carries a smartphone, there should be thousands of photos and videos.
I am just troubled that our government without approval I am sure, deleted thousands of private citizens photographs. I am sure many of the deleted photos had nothing to do with the shooting. And I am positive, many were the last photo of a loved one. That last photo of a husband, wife, or child was destroyed without permission by the FBI.
Here is the link to where I saw the FBI asking…
https://www.csoonline.com/article/3229967/security/fbi-asks-people-for-digital-evidence-of-las-vegas-shooting.html
I work very hard to support the police and law enforcement. But underhanded actions like these make it hard. If they told the citizens their photos would all be deleted, and then gave them a choice, I’d be okay. However, I’m willing to bet no one was told they would lose all their photos. And that I am not okay with. This is just bully enforcement. Under the color of law, agents doing anything they want legal or not.
A great example is the predawn no knock raid on Paul Manafort. According to reports, Manafort has consistently cooperated with law enforcement. And yet, FBI agents raided his in Alexandria, Va. Arriving in the pre-dawn hours, the raid, occurred without warning, and signaled an aggressive new approach by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III and his team. The comment made, “I think it adds a shock and awe enforcement component to what until now has followed a natural path for a white-collar investigation,” said Jacob Frenkel. Really, the federal government using “shock and awe,” against a cooperating witness. These shock and awe” tactics do not belong in a free society, they are policies of dictators and tyrants.
Badger
many were the last photo of a loved one. That last photo of a husband, wife, or child was destroyed without permission by the FBI.
DeleteHadn't thought of that.
===================
These shock and awe” tactics do not belong in a free society, they are policies of dictators and tyrants.
Absolutely and Mueller would make a good commie if he isn't already.
Pisses me off too - the take-over of private property.
ReplyDeleteCampos, the unregistered security guard who was suppose to
work for OnScene security firm has not been registered having
a business license since Jan. 2017. Stocks for mgm were being
sold off one month prior to this attack, just like 9/11.
Campos, if hit by a 200 rounds of .223 556 bullets would
have been shredded. See pic of him on this site - pure
muslim.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/10/14/fbi-hand-in-hand-with-vegas-pd-begin-damage-control-there-is-no-conspiracy-nobody-is-attempt-to-hide-anything/#more-161275
Paddock is an alleged shooter as no proof he did the
shooting - just a dead body laying on the floor.
Campos, if hit by a 200 rounds of .223 556 bullets would
Deletehave been shredded.
Thank but I don't believe he was hit by 200 rounds "was shot in the leg when Stephen Paddock opened fire and unleashed some 200 rounds through the door of his hotel room."
Yea, but if just one of the 200 hit him, he surely would not
ReplyDeletebe walking around like nothing happened. And I don't under-
stand how only one hit him when the bullets were flying.
A good article on some oddities on Las Vegas:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theorganicprepper.ca/survival-saturday-oct-14-2017-10142017
Thanks and question after question that goes unanswered.
Delete