Thursday, November 2, 2017

Should Gone with the Wind Go Away?

Via Billy


In the wake of increased PC attacks on Margaret Mitchell’s 1937 novel Gone With the Wind, I decided to undertake an ornery, contrarian, and politically incorrect action and plow through the novel’s 1,036 pages just for the heck of it, reacquainting myself with an acknowledged classic (which earned a Pulitzer Prize for the author) and hence be able to reflect on a cultural phenomenon with my own refreshed insights.

It is impossible to reflect on the novel without making some comparisons with its 1939 film adaptation. The film, of necessity, tightens the storyline and deletes certain characters (most notably Scarlett’s multiple children). The movie Mammy is a more dominating presence than in the novel but a similar towering moral force. Also missing from the film is the overt presence of the Ku Klux Klan in the Reconstruction period and the participation of Ashley Wilkes and Scarlett’s second husband, Frank Kennedy, in some of its activities. As far as the movie version is concerned, it defies any attempts that might be made to remake it, however uncomfortable some scenes might strike us today (Could anyone play Rhett Butler after Clark Gable? It’s difficult to imagine).    

9 comments:

  1. Go away? This literary masterpiece should be mandatory reading in all American High Schools.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hollywood could recast Will Smith as Rhett Butler as they did with the James West character in movie version of "Wild, Wild West". Makes about as much historical sense.............

    ReplyDelete
  3. There are some movies that should never, for any reason what so ever, by remade. Some movies are so perfect or iconic that a remake will never be the equal to or better than the original. Just think of the remake of Ghost Busters. Gone With The Wind is one of those movies. But since Hollywood has lost it's collective mind, very likely, some one out there will think doing a remake (aka a politically correct version) will be the next summer or "holiday season" block buster.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. some one out there will think doing a remake (aka a politically correct version) will be the next summer or "holiday season" block buster.

      Don't give them ideas..........:)

      Delete
  4. My mother took me to see it when I was maybe 10 or 11.
    She remembered the monster stir that the original release made back in the day.

    I've read the book 3 or 4 times now, and still like it.

    My daughter liked the movie at 10 years old, also.
    Heh, we sometimes call her Mammy, when she walks around grumbling under her breath.

    The thing is, neither the north nor The South come up smelling like roses in the book, but the blinders that SJWs wear won't let them see this.

    There are things that should have no remake. Nobody should cover an Elvis song, nobody should cover a Beatles song, nobody should do a remake of Bonanza, nobody should attempt GWTW 2.

    - Charlie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read it at 12 and the closer I got to the end, the slower I read as I didn't want it to end. When it did, I cried. https://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2013/10/lee-in-mountains-by-donald-davidson.html

      Delete
  5. >Could anyone play Rhett Butler after Clark Gable?

    No.

    ReplyDelete