Who is the big bad liar on the US missile attack on Syria?
The most important news in the press conference of the Deputy Chief of the Russian Staff
On the flip side, I am still a little shocked at this morning’s Pentagon report that “no missiles were intercepted”… see here in this Southfront report.
This claim is beyond shocking. Maybe what is left of the downed missiles can be collected and shipped to the US to be put on display for a day on the street outside the UN so Nikki Haley can see them on the way into work. Or maybe they could be put on the Pentagon lawn for a day.
So
we are left with US silly claim that it destroyed the Syrian chemical
weapons program, which it did not have and does not need, and result
being that the Pentagon opened the door for Russia’s moving S-300s into
Syria, with virtual US permission, as it claims the Syrians have zero
air defense.
More @ Veteran's Today
This site (where the article was published) is pro-palestinian and anti-Israel. It believes that on 9/11 we faked the WTC collapse or something. Seriously!
ReplyDeleteVT?
DeleteAll Trump needs now is a false flag attack on the US or an "asset" to present to congress. He is setting himself up for a declared war ,to be military dictator. His "appointments" to the federal court are ALL anti-gun/anti-constitution communist's so radical that not even Obama would have dared nominate them. If he doesn't trigger WW3 or a civil war in the next year it will only be the Grace of G_D that stopped him.--Ray
ReplyDeleteI heard the same thing about both Bushes, Clinton, and Obama. It didn't happen then, and it won't happen now.
Delete--generic
Michael Savage spoke today and does not believe the propaganda
ReplyDeleteabout the chemical attacks by Assad. He's down, down, down on
Trump and he was a big Trump supporter.
https://www.pscp.tv/w/1YqKDdLwkAwKV
Rense also does not believe the lies. The OPCW was a few
hours away to establish if there was or was not any chemical
weapons at the site. ( Organization for the Prohibition
of Chemical Weapons ) three hours away before the missiles
started flying - what did they not want you to know.
Everyone who knows Assad knows him as a moral gentle man.
Trump is a threat to national security because he has so
many skeletons in his closet to be blackmailed.
And Putin is big disappointment.
As many have stated, there was absolutely no reason in the world for Assad to do this and I am 100% sure that he didn't, this one or the previous one.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. Vietnam, THEY spared no mercy. Agent Orange, Dioxin
ReplyDeletestill killing today.
I know it’s not easy to accept, but the people in charge in the “WEST” are bullshitting us…………….to death.
Anyone who believes this is anything to do with "humanitarian
intervention" is a complete fool.
I remember reading a few days ago that the u.s. dropped plague
infected fleas on North Korea - that is a biological weapon.
But no missiles flew over here.
Agent Orange
DeleteTwo items:
We thought it was a good deal. The doctor that performed my biopsy in Okinawa,had graduated from my military school after me and was perplexed how I could have gotten cancer of the vocal cords at age 30. He said the only other case that he was aware of (other than the normal 50 - 60 year old many packs a day smoker) was a 19 year old girl but her Mother had had it. That and the fact, then unknown, that grass will counteract the ill effects of radiation.
http://www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=272&highlight=manila
I remember your story. They finally accepted the fact
Deletethat Agent Orange contributed to Cancer of the vocal
cords. They ,begrudgingly, started recognizing that
Agent Orange was the cause and effect of so many
different cancers. They fought it tooth and nail.
How does grass counteract the ill effects of radiation?
Evidently it works well against chemo also. I was asked by my doctor in the PI about the effects I was having from radiation and when I said none, he replied that he didn't understand why. Should work in cookies also, I would think.
DeleteThanks. Most interesting and invaluable.
DeleteA friend/ worker here said his Mother was going down but refuses to take chemo. I told him about cookies.
Deletehttps://alethonews.wordpress.com/2015/06/19/what-the-united-states-did-to-vietnam/
ReplyDeleteThanks.
DeleteThe article states that the French did not participate in the attack. The French themselves openly state they DID fire missiles. This discrepancy renders the ENTIRE article fiction. The ability of the Russians to shoot down incoming ordnance is MASSIVELY overstated by the Russians. They will NEVER admit the anti aircraft systems they sell for beaucoup money are ineffective. EVER. Whether or not all the missiles fired by the US, UK and France struck their targets is again not verifiable by anyone outside the Pentagon/Nato....and even those orgs could be in error. The only thing we can say with certainty about the ENTIRE mess there is nobody knows all the facts and what they do know they can't be certain of. If ever a cluster fuck existed this one is it.
ReplyDeleteI read that all the sites were evacuated earlier in the week.
DeleteWhile the claim is beyond shocking, it may well be true. As is the claim that they achieved their mission. its very difficult to do BDA for multiple strikes on a single location. We can tell each location was hit multiple times, but not how many hits in the same hole. Nor can Russian ADA radar tell since on radar, a cruise missile getting knocked down near the tarhet looks just like one detonating over target.
ReplyDeleteLike we have seen in previous night bombing footage, enemy ADA often fires into the night sky long after the targets have left. And all of the aircraft fired from very long range, so they were never at risk.
Bottom line: as in many cases like this, we simply don't know and likely never will know. Plenty of people will believe whatever they like. Just remember the words of Abraham Lincoln... "Don't believe everything you read on the internet".
--generic
a cruise missile getting knocked down near the tarhet looks just like one detonating over target.
DeleteDidn't know that.
Oh, and a cruise missIle that hits it's target and explodes also leaves a lot of parts behind. So collecting them up and dumping them on the lawn proves nothing.
ReplyDelete--generic
Seems like it might be able to differentiate between the two but a waste of time, I believe.
DeleteThe differentiation is in examining the pieces on the ground. If the missile works as expected the aft section has larger pieces remaining, with central and nose sections reduced to small shrapnel. If the missile is shot down, it crashes mostly intact, with damage from impact with the ground. Bigger pieces and unexploded explosives in the debris. But on radar, it's the same. In coming missile goes to the target and disappears from radar. Even long range radars have limited engagement windows fow low flying cruise missiles (why we invented them). And have some have speculated, if they whole pupose was to overwhelm ground defenses, then they were totally effective even if they were shot down. That was their purpose. There is a limit to how many missiles an Ada system has in the launcher with substantial time between reloads.
Delete--generic
A RE Lee said, you will learn something new everyday until you die.
DeleteWhole lot of anti-military/anti-American talk going on here. I especially like the people who think Assad would never use chemical weapons against his own people. You'all need a hobby or something.
ReplyDeleteWhy would he do this when he was close to victory and knew perfectly well what would happened if he did. Even if he made a dumb decision and targeted the opposition, that would not explain what benefit he would have by targeting citizens.
DeleteDouble false flag. Brilliant!!
Delete--generic