Sunday, March 24, 2019

NO COLLUSION: Attorney General William Barr Releases Mueller's Findings, Finds No Evidence Of Conspiracy, Obstruction

Robert S. Mueller III, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), takes part in a question-and-answer forum at the International Conference on Cyber Security (ICCS) on August 8, 2013 in New York City.

A letter released to Congress by Attorney General William Barr Sunday afternoon claims that Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence "to establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference."

Trump To DC Attorney General Karl Racine Who Filed Lawsuit Against Him: 'I Feel Like I Know You'

"The Special Counsel found no evidence that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired with the Russians to influence the election, despite offers by the Russians to do so," the report reads.

6 comments:

  1. The report used the phrase "did not exonerate" the President of "obstruction of justice". Obstructing justice in what crime? Mueller is a prosecutor. He does not exonerate. He indicts you. So if he doesn't find evidence to indict, you are "innocent until proven guilty".
    This is what Trump should proclaim since most all the left still "find him guilty" and must still search for the crime. As Sen. Chuck Schumer said of Trump on another matter,, "I hope he's learned his lesson." Well, they should learn or perhaps re-learn another very basic one:

    "No free government, or the blessings of liberty can be preserved to any people, but by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles." -- Founder, George Mason

    --Ron W

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you are "innocent until proven guilty".

      Yes and all I remember is Trump stating he 'expects loyalty' but they evidently agreed that it would be impossible to convict on that.

      Delete
    2. A prosecutor never says he found it impossible to convict, he simply does not indict. Mueller didn't indite after 25 million and thousands of interviews later. But his methods and abuses stand as a symbol of what a government is capable of if not controlled. Imagine if such tactics had been used against your family. These people need to be sent to jail and removed from law enforcement.

      Delete
    3. his methods and abuses stand as a symbol of what a government is capable of if not controlled. Imagine if such tactics had been used against your family. These people need to be sent to jail and removed from law enforcement.

      No, ifs, ands or buts.

      Delete
  2. And the report alleged that Russia hacked into the DNC server and acquired Podesta's emails and supposedly forwarded ther them to wikileaks. So how was that supposed fact ascertained when the DNC refused to turn over their server to the FBI? And why didn't the FBI conduct an operation like it did on Michael Cohen's office or Roger Stone's home??
    --Ron W

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. how was that supposed fact ascertained when the DNC refused to turn over their server to the FBI?

      Good question.

      ============]
      And why didn't the FBI conduct an operation like it did on Michael Cohen's office or Roger Stone's home?

      As my Mother would say, "Three guesses and the first two don't count: :)

      Delete