Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Masterpiece Cakeshop Was Just Sued For 'Discrimination' For A THIRD Time

 

Masterpiece Cakeshop is again under fire, now the subject of a third discrimination lawsuit alleging that owner Jack Phillips "discriminated" against a customer by refusing to make a cake for an unspecified event.

 Phillips, of course, won at the United States Supreme Court after suing a Colorado "human rights" commission that punished him for refusing to provide a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding in Denver, a task Phillips said violated his religious conviction that true marriage is between one man and one woman. Phillips offered to sell the couple a pre-made cake or refer them to another baker — solutions that would have allowed Phillips to avoid material participation in the same-sex wedding — but the couple wasn't satisfied and leveled a complaint with Colorado authorities.

10 comments:

  1. Same person filing a third lawsuit after the first went to the Supreme Cort? Get a restraining order for harassment. They show up to try to place an order, they get arrested.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Get a restraining order for harassment.

      Good point.

      Delete
  2. When you can no longer count on the law to protect you, other, older practices return.

    --generic

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's called "lawfare", using the courts and legal actions as a weapon against anyone who won't toe the line. The goal is to win by either forcing the respondent to give up and be a good slave or bankrupt them as punishment. There are DEEP liberal pockets funding lawsuits like this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are DEEP liberal pockets funding lawsuits like this.

      I imagine.

      Delete
  4. The “Queer Mafia” will allow no opposition to their agenda. It was never tolerance but always complete destruction of morality. There have to be 20,000 other bakers in Colorado. Why does every homo or tranny want this man to bake for them? Just because he won't kneel to their co#&sucking agendas.

    He needs a good lawyer to attack the pervert that is harassing him. Sue him into bankruptcy. Take everything thing he owns. He can move to San Francisco and be one of the homeless there. He’d fit right in.

    Badger

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was never tolerance but always complete destruction of morality.

      Yes.
      ==========
      He can move to San Francisco and be one of the homeless there. He’d fit right in.

      It was bad enough in '69 when I spent a extension leave there.

      Delete
  5. So if I go to an anti-gun bakery, may I due if they refuse to adorn my birthday cake with a depiction of a pistol if I do choose? But wait, there are businesses which put signs up that keep me out while I'm exercising my Constitutional RKBA and that's lawful, they say.
    --Ron W

    ReplyDelete