Monday, July 29, 2019

CA judge rules semi-auto rifles not protected under 2nd Amendment

Via  Stephanie

 

A federal judge in California ruled last week that banning semi-automatic rifles is not a violation of the right to bear arms as afforded by the Second Amendment.

U.S. District Judge Josephine Staton of Santa Ana, Calif. ruled on July 22 to uphold the current state law banning the ownership, manufacture, or sale of “semiautomatic rifles and the bullet buttons that alter a conventional rifle into a rapid-fire weapon,” the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

Posted by at

19 comments:

  1. JWMJRJuly 30, 2019 at 12:09 AM

    By the logic of these people TV, radio and the internet have no right to freedom of the press because their technology didn't exist in the 18th century.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brock TownsendJuly 30, 2019 at 1:11 PM

      Logic wasn't my best subject, but.............:)

      Delete
  2. AesopJuly 30, 2019 at 6:25 AM

    Grist for the mill.
    She'll be overturned. Her ruling doesn't comport with the guidelines under either Heller or MacDonald, as even the 9th Circus has been finding more and more of late.
    She's just volunteered to become a judicial laughingstock, at her own expense.

    And as usual, the FriscoComical misstates the entire purpose of "bullet buttons", like the libtard morons they are.
    They are magazine catches that require a tool to remove the magazine. The rifle itself fires no faster with nor without them (they merely make mag changes a 3-second procedure, rather than a 2-minute procedure by taking the gun apart), and no magazine larger than 10 rounds is currently available nor authorized except for "Only Ones" in Califrutopia anyways.

    So that's two idiots, one ruling, and one writing, for the price of one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brock TownsendJuly 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM

      So that's two idiots, one ruling, and one writing, for the price of one.

      Well said. :)

      Delete
    2. BorepatchJuly 30, 2019 at 3:40 PM

      "Laws are spider webs through which the big flies pass and the little ones get caught."

      - Honore de Balzac

      Delete
    3. Brock TownsendJuly 30, 2019 at 7:25 PM

      Hadn't heard that. Thanks.

      Delete
  3. AnonymousJuly 30, 2019 at 10:51 AM

    Progressive Left judge with agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  4. tsquaredJuly 30, 2019 at 12:42 PM

    The federal judge needs to be re-educated. The second amendment is not about limiting the citizens, it is about limiting government.

    ReplyDelete
  5. BJuly 31, 2019 at 2:29 AM

    and that judge is fixin to get an ass waxing from the USSC

    ReplyDelete
  6. cannonJuly 31, 2019 at 5:43 AM

    add to that ewspapers and magazines printed with high speed printing presses.
    freedom of speech?? again, not over radio, t.y., or the internet.
    freedom of religion?? no mega churches, or for that matter, any church which uses electricity in any way.

    better be careful how tou "interperate" what was written over two hundred years ago. your same words may be used against you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousJuly 31, 2019 at 1:17 PM

    Right tsquared, "shall not be infringed" is directed to the government. According to the Preamble to the Bill of Rights, they were "added clauses go prevent usurpations and abuses" by the government. The Constitution delegates NO POWER to the Federal Government for gun control laws pertaining to the People, but only "for governing such part of them (the Militia) as may be EMPLOYED in its service" (Article I, Section 16). So additional to "shall not be infringed", according to the 10th Amendment, the Federal Government may do NOTHING for which it has NO delegated powers! --Ron W

    ReplyDelete
  8. digicashceoAugust 20, 2019 at 5:16 PM

    gun nuts. i'm a veteran but damn, how many firearms do you need?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)