In a surprising turn of events, the New York Times has done some actual, real investigative reporting and confirmed Revolver’s conclusion that the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting is an open-and-shut case of self-defense. Shockingly, the evidence turned up by the New York Times actually strengthens the case for self-defense.
It turns out that, before the first shooting, Rittenhouse was being chased by a gunman who actually fired a shot into the air. This little detail was actually missed by Revolver News in our initial review of the evidence. We did not realize that, in the first shooting, Rittenhouse was being chased by a gunman.
More @ Revolver
The FACTS....what REALLY happened are irrelevant. Facts haven't mattered for a LONG TIME now. This poor kid is going to be CRUCIFIED by the media and the left publicly and since the VAST majority of Prosecutors in America are anti 2A anti self defense COMMUNISTS he is going to be hit with every charge they can dream up in an effort to destroy him. REALITY IS IRRELEVANT if it doesn't serve the agenda of the commie left and their media whore accomplices.
ReplyDeleteHe SHOULD be not guilty of all charges except the one about him being 17 and crying a rifle if that is their law.
Delete