Monday, September 13, 2021

NYT Reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg: Vaccination ‘Not a Personal Choice,’ ‘My Right to Not Get Killed’ Comes First

Appearing Monday on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, New York Times reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg argued that receiving vaccines is not a personal decision during disease outbreaks, stating her “right to not to get killed” comes before those who want the freedom to choose whether or not they want to be inoculated.

More @ Breitbart

14 comments:

  1. Life comes with risk. Getting the jab doesn't mean you can't get covid. Doesn't mean you won't die. Taking the jab can cause serious, permanent problems, or death. So, sweetheart,, like Popeye says,
    Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chances...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Popeye says,Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chances...

      :) Thanks.

      Delete
  2. All those years studying the great philosophers did some good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good luck. Bring it. Let the shootin' commence. 🖕🏻🖕🏻

    ReplyDelete
  4. Her logic is akin to someone demanding 10MPH-max governors be mandatory on all vehicles in America because your right to speed ends with their right not to be killed in an auto accident.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mika is an idiot. Most of the COVID deaths were from BEFORE the vaccines were even available.

    The COVID vaccines are nothing like past vaccines; they are gene therapy, they are experimental, and they have already proven to be of minimal value and much higher risk than typical vaccines of an more ordinary nature, per the VAERS data.

    It is immoral and unethical to force anyone to take these experimental vaccines. There will be legal and possibly criminal consequences for those authorities that force anyone to be vaccinated with these mRNA treatments.

    ReplyDelete
  6. These people are abject morons..... If they are vaccinated the CANNOT get sick, they are SAFE....assuming the vaccine actually works as a vaccine. And if the AREN'T safe then the vaccine does NOT work and getting vaccinated is POINTLESS. Unless of course the"vaccine" was never intended to protect anyone from the virus. It's First Grade level logic.....which apparently is too difficult for these idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Exactly. How is she even trying to compare this to something like the polio vaccine, which actually prevented you from getting polio, so if you came in contact with someone who had polio, you wouldn't catch it? This is not even a vaccine, if people can carry the same amount of the virus as anyone who hasn't had that shot, and still catch it and still die. This isn't even something that people just found out yesterday, so why do so many of them continue to carry on about getting a shot that doesn't work like any vaccine we've had in the past? I was never against vaccinations, but I won't take something that might leave me worse off than I am now. If they were truly vaccinated against coronavirus, they wouldn't need to worry whether anyone else got a shot or not. I don't understand what's going on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Our Left-Of-Lenin press/government/corporations have insured we are brain washed. :( Thanks.

      Delete