Monthly U.S. Worker Displacement Report
October 3, 2014
Mike Scruggs
Edwin
S. Rubenstein, President of ESR (Economic) Research, reveals some
employment statics each month that you probably won’t see in the New
York Times, the Washington Post, or your local newspaper. In fact, you
probably won’t even see them in the Wall Street Journal.
Mainstream
media and many bank economists are chattering about what a good month
September was. Jobs were up 236,000, or 0.167 percent, and the official
U-3 unemployment rate is down to 5.9 percent.
That
sounds great on the surface, but inside they are actually alarming.
Rubenstein breaks the numbers down into native born employment and
foreign born employment. For September, foreign born employment rose a
whopping 369,000 or 1.52 percent. Native born employment actually
dropped 137,000 or -0.11 percent.
The
difference between native and foreign born employment in the last two
months, August and September, is shocking. The net gain was 248,000, but
foreign born employment was up 1,028,000 or 4.32 percent, while native
employment dropped 780,000 or -0.6 percent
Since
January 2009 (Obama inauguration) foreign born employment has increased
3,314,000 or 15.1 percent, while native born employment increased by
1,065,000, slightly less than 1.0 percent.
Do
you wonder what is going on here? Who loses? Who gains? What further
consequences will there be? Who wants to hide it and why?
Foreign
born employment is rising sharply, and U.S. workers are being
displaced. This same rise in cheap foreign labor is also driving incomes
down for native born workers, whose wages are close to $2,800 lower per
year (my computation using Borjas data and U.S. BLS statistics) because
of continuing waves of cheaper foreign labor.
All
this is very alarming and bodes ill for real per capita growth in the
economy. Importing cheap foreign labor also increases the welfare burden
on taxpayers.
Do
you think Congress and State Legislators should be concerned about
American worker displacements and declining wages? Do think voters
should be concerned?
No comments:
Post a Comment