Liam Neeson will once more portray a “hero” who uses guns in the third and presumably final installment of his “Taken” series opening Friday. While a (fluctuating) “Tomatometer” score of 21 percent (at this writing) and no small number of snarky pans from critics don’t bode well for the opening weekend box office, gun owners have another reason for staying away: Why give aid and comfort to an avowed enemy of the right to keep and bear arms?
More @ Examiner
Seems like a lot of people get "taken" by this actor. If you dont believe in civilian firearm ownership-dont play a gun guy in the movies. Besides, this type of movie for him seems like a dead horse. Its been rode and its time to put it out to pasture.
ReplyDelete. Its been rode and its time to put it out to pasture.
DeletePut him out also. :)
Damn I wish I would have known sooner I would have put back my copy of Les Miserable I refuse to give money to left wingers or the press
ReplyDeleteLiam Neeson
DeleteI checked but didn't see him in the film version...............?
Should have used Steven Seagal; he is pro-gun and owns an arsenal, though
ReplyDeletehe is up there in age.
62 and looks good.
Deletehttp://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/10/entertainment-us-usa-arizona-seagal-idUSBRE91901J20130210
Thanks. I was hoping he was going to make a run for president as
Deletethis as come up before. He would have my vote because, again,
there ain't nothing to vote for. The same old hogwash.
there ain't nothing to vote for. The same old hogwash.
DeleteYup.