Sunday, October 8, 2017

Trump unveils new strict 70-point immigration enforcement plan

Via Billy


Determined to finally solve illegal immigration, the White House submitted a 70-point enforcement plan to Congress Sunday proposing the stiffest reforms ever offered by an administration — including a massive rewrite of the law in order to eliminate loopholes illegal immigrants have exploited to gain a foothold in the U.S.

The plans, seen by The Washington Times, include President Trump’s calls for a border wall, more deportation agents, a crackdown on sanctuary cities and stricter limits to chain migration — all issues the White House says need to be part of any bill Congress passes to legalize illegal immigrant “Dreamers” currently protected by the Obama-era deportation amnesty known as DACA.

But the plans break serious new ground on the legal front, giving federal agents more leeway to deny illegal immigrants at the border, to arrest and hold them when they’re spotted in the interior, and to deport them more speedily. The goal, the White House said, is to ensure major changes to border security, interior enforcement and the legal immigration system.

Posted by at

4 comments:

  1. AnonymousOctober 8, 2017 at 11:59 PM

    While we're at it, lets fix the automatic citizenship thing for kids of none citizens born in the U.S. If your not a citizen of this county and your child is born here, your child is a citizen of the country of the country you come from, not the U.S. Fix this and quit having anchor babies!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. bogsidebunnyOctober 9, 2017 at 8:40 AM

    An inconvenient truth:

    Republican politicians will not stand behind President Trump. Their loyalty is to Agricultural & Industrial lobbyists who fill the politicians personal coffers with millions annually and not to the voters who naively put them in office.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brock TownsendOctober 9, 2017 at 1:44 PM

      lobbyists who fill the politicians personal coffers with millions annually and not to the voters who naively put them in office.

      Precisely, I had a run in with Burr's office when I accused him of voting a certain way since he got much more money from one side than the other.

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)