Thursday, September 6, 2018

Poll: Nike Favorability Crashes 34% with Kaepernick Ad Campaign

 Kaepernick Nike

A poll from Morning Consult shows devastating results for Nike’s brand favorability, in the days after making Colin Kaepernick the face of their new ad campaign.

According to the poll via Axios, Nike’s numbers “dropped 34 points from a net +69 favorable impression (76% favorable, 7% unfavorable) among consumers to a net +35 favorable impression (60% favorable, 24% unfavorable).”

These numbers are nothing short of devastating for Nike, and with no other news worthy of note, there’s no explanation for the sudden decline other than the company’s commitment to Kaepernick.

According to Axios:

More @ Breitbart

4 comments:

  1. To all the virtue signalers, who think signing away your natural rights is somehow noble. Maybe you should do some research into what this man has done to prevent potential criminals from turning to crime, in his/our poor communities. Are you courageous to withstand being ostracized for your personal belief and ACTIONS. I doubt that very serious as many, if not most, vets seek acknowledgment for their service. The most humble and honest of men do not brag of their charity, hoping for due diligence on our part to recognize their actions. I plead with you to disregard the empty words written against this man's character, and recognize his sacrifice to make some of the hardest communities in our back yard, better in some aspect. For if you demean Kaepernick's means of addressing real problems, those problems may soon become YOUR PROBLEMS! And for what, public indoctrination for MIC support?

    Individuals deserve respect for their personal sacrifice, being part of a support group is for the conformist who can't produce.

    You took an oath to uphold the individual's natural rights, as outlined by the Bill of Rights, to maintain the Republic for United States. Are the negative articles a form of 'buyers remorse'?

    PS Thanks for the post, it will bring some positive attention.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. his sacrifice?

      Comparable to those who died? Give me a break.

      Delete
    2. "Comparable to those who died"...by their own hand?

      Being considered a 'selfish act', most would say yes.
      Again, the individual. I know for a fact, many vet groups do great things for their communities at large, seen it first hand. Should I count homeless vets among them? (How about that NC native, screwed out of 400K, they used virtue signaling as justification) Group IDentity is a SJW tactic, Marx creation for division.
      CK is doing what he believes to be right, and from what I can tell, he isn't being hedonistic. If we can't agree he is doing the right thing, can we at least agree he is not doing the wrong things, that tend to make society worse?

      Offense is taken, never given.
      If violence doesn't intimidate you, how can you be scared of someone who doesn't participate in a socialist indoctrination ceremony?
      Why do you engage the media spin-up, did he take something imaginary from you? Maybe the ideal that the military is above reproach?
      Marxist (SJW) don't respect the individual's rights, they hold group identity privilege as their gold standard. 'Resisting arrest..for what', hate crime against a cop.

      The NoM&D MSM divide us into what ever pigeon hole they can push us in, as rebels it's our job to recognize why.

      Delete