All of these facts appear to show the “collusion” investigation was begun by those with apparent political motives and complete disregard for protocols. This suggests that, indeed, a small political faction inside the U.S. government attempted to sway a presidential election — and used our country’s counterintelligence assets to do it.
The word “coup” evokes imagery of bloody revolution, but does a coup have to be bloody, or even happen all at once? What if, instead, a bloodless, rolling coup started with a snowball and ended with an avalanche? Many believe this very thing happened in 2016, with a small political cabal determined to see Hillary Clinton elected president. When she was defeated, the theory goes, they worked even harder to try to bring her hated opponent, Donald Trump, down by any means necessary — even if this caused much of the American public to believe the president of the United States is the tool of a foreign adversary.
More @ The Hill
"Bloodless".....so far. Not likely to remain that way however.
ReplyDeleteYup.
DeleteHanging, being outlawed by their peers, may have been too good for them.
ReplyDeleteEmollition, Impalement, STONES may be suitable alternates.
Hmmm, All can be accomplished with "sustainable, renewable, recycled, and GLUTEN FREE products."
Hey, that's a definite WIN-WIN!
:) !
Delete