Am I just being, speaking out as it is so well defined by the department of homeland security, nothing but a mouth breathing, provincial knuckle dragging, domestic white male terrorist?
Or am I correct in pointing out the truth, the truth that our military is absent from the idea of Liberty? Is it populated with cowards? Traitors by way of inaction even? What? I can not figure it out.
Every one who is in the military has taken a solemn vow, an oath that says in it, it is their duty to protect and defend the US Constitution, (and by consequence, we the people), from All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic.
The question is, what of that oath?
Lt. Colonel Terry Larkin, far as I can determine, is the only Military man who has taken the stand of Liberty, honored his oath to protect and defend The US Constitution from the blatant outright Tyranny that constitutes our representative government today.
That system of tyranny, kangaroo'd courted Lt. Col Larkin straight to a jail cell in a new york minute.
For the crime of not ignoring his oath.
Is the truth something like this:
I have not heard of one fellow officer or enlisted man, within this brotherhood, defend the one guy who stood up and honored their oath, the oath that they all took.
Have any of you out there?
So it comes to reason.
It is reason that created the idea of a Constitutional Republic. It is men who chose reason to guide them in their dream of Liberty.
It is reason that leads me to this:
If everyone in uniform is afraid to defend their own within the ranks, out of principle, with virtue, for the cause of Liberty, is it too far a stretch of to suppose there is no help coming for American's from this quarter, fellow Americans who choose Liberty or Death over tyranny, Americans outside the military.
I mean if they can't stick up for their own, how are they going to stick up for their country?
Whats wrong with this picture?
Whats going on here guys?
What part of Defend and Protect The US Constitution from ALL Enemies Foreign and Domestic does anyone not understand?
Far as I can see, answer to this question of questions, the truth of this sorry reality, is the absence of that oath being honored, says everything.
Eternal everlasting shame.
Tell me I am wrong, please.
We got a little boy drawing pictures of Chickens that are fed up. A little boy who understands the tyranny enveloping us. ( Civil War 2 - The Chickens Have Had Enough! )
We got a million deer hunters that by many accounts are useless, who don't stand a snowballs chance in hell of honoring their oath of being rule of law abiding America's, who via lawful means of redress codified in Constitutional law express their desire to right these injustices of tyranny. That their need to throw off the chains of despotism is fruitless, unless, they do what guys who took an oath tell them to do. Well maybe those wise military minds are correct, might be they are not, but one things certain, those deer hunters, and fed up chickens too, got one thing in spades over the vast majority of those in the military...
Care to hazard a guess what it is?
Why does a little boy understand what this is about and has the virtue to express his concerns, but an entire army, the greatest mightiest military force the history of the human race has known, essentially mum?
Do you hear Crickets?
There is something incredibly wrong here.
Mind blowingly FUBAR
--Mt Top Patriot