Saturday, March 20, 2021
Obama-Era WH Stenographer, Who Claims to Have Been on Biden’s 2011 Trip to Russia, Reveals Putin b**** slapped Biden
“He basically got body-slammed by Putin, really. I mean, I don’t know how else to describe it,” McCormick said. “To me it was like, here’s our great foreign policy expert and he just got punk’d. And Vladimir Putin just had no fear or respect for him.”
During Joe Biden’s Tuesday interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos, the host remarked, “You said you know [Putin] doesn’t have a soul.”
“I did say that to him, yes,” Biden answered. “And — and his response was, ‘We understand one another.’ It was — I wasn’t being a wise guy. I was alone with him in his office. And that — that’s how it came about. It was when President Bush had said, ‘I looked in his eyes and saw his soul.’”
More @ RTM
President Donald Trump released a statement in response to a report from the New York Times that bemoaned the fact that conservatives are making election integrity a central part of their platform, and are raising money as a result, due to the credible accusations of widespread voter fraud that plagued the 2020 election.
More @ RTM
#China rigged the investigation by #WHO into the #COVID outbreak.— Sarhad Ke Paar (@Par1Ke) March 14, 2021
Peter Daszak, the WHO “expert” with huge conflicts of interests, was responsible for convincing fellow investigators that it wasn’t necessary to look into data wiped by #Chinahttps://t.co/kqILIAMOZ6
With all the commotion about Biden taking a nasty spill on Air Force One, this story seemed to float under the radar.
Peter Daszak is the only American on the WHO’s team that is supposed to investigate the origins of COVID-19.
The investigation was a waste of time since Daszak is on the CCP payroll and has a giant conflict of interest.
More @ WLT
Message in from a new military officer pic.twitter.com/FXQvpdRfsd— Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) March 19, 2021
When military officers attacked a private citizen in uniform last week, that was a troubling sign and dangerous precedent.
Message from a Navy member pic.twitter.com/uZ8enX1Es7— Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) March 19, 2021
Not to mention that it revealed much of our military leadership has been subverted by woke identity politics.
And more evidence of this woke military takeover is piling up.
Active service members have anonymously voiced their displeasure of what’s happening at the top.
More @ WLT
“The increased power of the press is so dangerous today because we are very close to one-party control of these institutions,” said Silberman, who was nominated to the federal bench by Ronald Reagan and has been a senior judge on the D.C. Circuit Court since 2000.
“Although the bias against the Republican Party—not just controversial individuals—is rather shocking today, this is not new; it is a long-term, secular trend going back at least to the ’70s,” Silberman wrote. “Two of the three most influential papers (at least historically), The New York Times and The Washington Post, are virtually Democratic Party broadsheets. And the news section of The Wall Street Journal leans in the same direction. The orientation of these three papers is followed by The Associated Press and most large papers across the country (such as the Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, and Boston Globe). Nearly all television—network and cable—is a Democratic Party trumpet. Even the government-supported National Public Radio follows along.”
He accused Silicon Valley of filtering news “in ways favorable to the Democratic Party” and fueling censorship, citing the suppression of the New York Post’s bombshell reporting on Hunter Biden in the final weeks of the 2020 presidential election.
“It is well-accepted that viewpoint discrimination ‘raises the specter that the Government may effectively drive certain ideas or viewpoints from the marketplace,'” Silberman said. “But ideological homogeneity in the media—or in the channels of information distribution—risks repressing certain ideas from the public consciousness just as surely as if access were restricted by the government.”
Silberman also sounded the alarm about the “serious efforts to muzzle” outlets like Fox News that aren’t under “Democratic Party ideological control.”
“It should be borne in mind that the first step taken by any potential authoritarian or dictatorial regime is to gain control of communications, particularly the delivery of news. It is fair to conclude, therefore, that one-party control of the press and media is a threat to a viable democracy,” the judge continued. “It may even give rise to countervailing extremism.
“The First Amendment guarantees a free press to foster a vibrant trade in ideas. But a biased press can distort the marketplace. And when the media has proven its willingness—if not eagerness—to so distort, it is a profound mistake to stand by unjustified legal rules that serve only to enhance the press’ power.
More @ RTM