Saturday, January 31, 2015

Statism: The Most Dangerous Religion

Via  Michael via NC Renegade

Muslim Brotherhood Starts A Political Party Out Of Chicago

Via comment by Anonymous on Open Jihad Declared in Egypt Following State Dept....

In this, the final segment in the Center’s series on the USCMO (United States Council of Muslim Organizations), the first U.S. political party openly associated with the jihadist Muslim Brotherhood, the rise of the UMMA (not an acronym but the full name of the group) follows shortly on the return of Sabri Samirah, member of the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood, to the U.S. following eleven years of exile. Once Samirah’s travel ban was lifted by the Obama administration in early 2014, he returned quickly to the U.S. and launched into a busy schedule of appearances and speeches to galvanize the U.S. Muslim community to political activism.

By 23 September 2014, Samirah’s new organization, Our UMMA, which succeeded UMAA (United Muslim Americans Association) to promote the political ambitions of the Muslim Brotherhood formally had been established with the Illinois Secretary of State’s office. The following picture is a screenshot from the Illinois Secretary of State’s office with the corporation file detail report for UMMA where Sabri Samirah is named as the registered agent.

Paradise Stolen

Via comment by Anonymous on America's Coolest Small Town 2015

AR500 Armor® vs. 12ga Slugs

Texas Governor Greg Abbott: February 2 Chris Kyle Day

Via LH

Embedded image permalink 

“Hating Whitey” in Arizona–More Marxist lies for college students

Via Billy

It seems that the racialist attacks against white people, at all levels, by the politically correct “progressives” (Socialists) are intensifying almost to the point of mania, or maybe it’s to the point of phobia.

You Thought Conservatives Were Moralistic? Liberal Rules for Political Correctness Are Repressive, Exhausting, Liberal Author Complains

Via WiscoDave

College Students

While conservatives are often considered moralistic to a fault, liberal moralism has become so repressive that some liberals now fear everyday conversations.

In a Tuesday article for New York Magazine, a liberal publication, Jonathan Chait wrote about the new "political correctness," which now comes in the form of phrases like "trigger warnings," "microaggressions" or "mansplaining." These new liberal rules, Chait wrote, is a "system of left-wing ideological repression." Those rules are so stifling, any meaningful debate in liberal circles is cut off.

"A community, virtual or real, that adheres to the rules is deemed 'safe.' The extensive terminology plays a crucial role, locking in shared ideological assumptions that make meaningful disagreement impossible," he explained.

The victims of the new political correctness, Chait pointed out, are not just conservatives; often, they are liberal. He interviewed several liberals for the article and his thesis was provided further confirmation when some asked not to be identified for fear of retribution from their fellow liberals.

An unidentified "professor at a prestigious university" told Chait that she and her colleagues are so "terrified of facing accusations of triggering trauma" that they avoid "traditional academic work of intellectual exploration." "This is an environment of fear," she said in explaining her need for anonymity.

More @ CP

Chuck Hagel Admits He Was Pressured by The Obama White House To Release GITMO Detainees…

Via comment by Sioux on Outrage Over Public Defender’s Arrest Caught on Vi...

 It has long been suspected that President Obama took the direction to empty GITMO of detainees as a strategic maneuver once he was politically unable to put them into Federal DOJ custody for trial.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel confirms the pressure in that regard.


Via comment by Sioux on Obama's America: Red States Bore The Brunt Of Fede...

Valerie Jarrett Promises To Hurt Israel, Netanyahu For “Spitting In Obama’s Face” Over Iran Nukes 

Nobody on Obama’s staff has the power to speak this viciously and forcefully, to make crystal clear threats like this against a world leader, to the press, other than Valerie Jarrett.

Plus, the sense of being so very PERSONALLY offended, so PERSONALLY invested in the President, is only going to come from Valerie Jarrett, we all know that. And lastly, the threatening language, the raging, vindictive arrogance are all Valerie’s emotional and rhetorical signatures. Take it to the bank that it was her.