Sunday, April 28, 2013

In a first, black voter turnout rate passes whites

Via Billy

EBT cards and Obama phones free, if you vote for me.:)

America's blacks voted at a higher rate than other minority groups in 2012 and by most measures surpassed the white turnout for the first time, reflecting a deeply polarized presidential election in which blacks strongly supported Barack Obama while many whites stayed home.

Had people voted last November at the same rates they did in 2004, when black turnout was below its current historic levels, Republican Mitt Romney would have won narrowly, according to an analysis conducted for The Associated Press.

Census data and exit polling show that whites and blacks will remain the two largest racial groups of eligible voters for the next decade. Last year's heavy black turnout came despite concerns about the effect of new voter-identification laws on minority voting, outweighed by the desire to re-elect the first black president.
"The 2012 turnout is a milestone for blacks and a huge potential turning point."
- Andra Gillespie, political science professor at Emory University
William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, analyzed the 2012 elections for the AP using census data on eligible voters and turnout, along with November's exit polling. He estimated total votes for Obama and Romney under a scenario where 2012 turnout rates for all racial groups matched those in 2004. Overall, 2012 voter turnout was roughly 58 percent, down from 62 percent in 2008 and 60 percent in 2004.

More @ Fox


Via NC Renegade

Obama is Awesome........Duh!

Via Knuckledraggin' My Life Away

"The fraud is on. Will we keep falling for it?"

Via Cordite In The Morning


 "It was not the magistrate judge who decided Tsarnaev should be Mirandized. It was President Obama and Attorney General Holder."

So now, the next necessary deception in the campaign is to convince you that — all together now — “the system worked.” In reality, the civilian justice system did not work, and that is because it cannot work — not if the objective is the swift acquisition of vital national-defense information.

It could not be more obvious to an objective, rational person that if the aim is intelligence collection, it is far better to interrogate a terrorist without limitations on time and subject matter, without the interference of a defense lawyer, and without empowering the detainee by giving him plea-bargaining leverage to trade for information. The Obama administration, however, is telling you, with a straight face, that the imposition of civilian due process will produce intelligence just as effectively, if not better.

Most people, of course, realize that this is impossible if Miranda warnings must be given. So the administration rolls out canard No. 1: the “public-safety exception.” The public is led to believe that this exception means agents have at least 48 hours of freewheeling interrogation before Miranda kicks in and the terrorist clams up (upon lawyering up). This is brazenly false.

More @ NRO

Saudi Arabian king's MASSIVE motorcade

Via Ryan


"If you could eat dinner with any historical and political figure, who would it be?"

Via Ryan

The paleo cartoonist Kevin George Tuma poses the question:
"If you could eat dinner with any historical and political figure, who would it be?"
A lot of answers came in from Jesus to Jefferson. The funniest reply was from a guy I know named David who said,
"Lincoln, if I can shoot him again."

GRNC Alert 4-28-13 Restaurant Carry Gets Vote on Tuesday!


On Wednesday, HB 937, “Amend Various Firearm Laws” which contains; restaurant carry, provisions for guns in locked vehicles on college campuses, carry in assemblies for which admission is charged, and a "cleanup" of parks carry language, passed from the House Judiciary A Subcommittee. It is now calendared for a vote on the House floor on Tuesday, April 30. Attacks by anti-gun leftists, narrowly fended off in the committee, will likely be tried again when the bill hits the floor.

Anti-gun treachery you can expect

Numerous anti-gun amendments were attempted in committee, principally by Reps. Deborah Ross (D-Wake, 0-star) and Darren Jackson (D-Wake , GRNC 0-star) . Although all anti-gun amendments failed in committee, they will try again when the bill hits the floor, so here they are:

Protecting rapists instead of students: Both UNC lobbyist Andrew Moretz and NCSU police chief Jack Moorman testified to the committee in opposition to allowing concealed handgun permit-holders to keep guns on college campuses, but neglected mentioning the high rate of violent crime on those campuses. In fact, Moorman apparently prefers to protect rapists rather than students, since the morning after he testified against self-protection on campuses, a student was dragged into bushes and raped outside the "Free Expression Tunnel." Lest you assume Rep. Bob Steinburg (R-Camden, Chowan, Currituck, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrrell, ****) supports the bill, he introduced an amendment which would have undermined the deterrent effect of guns on campus by requiring guns be kept in locked compartments within vehicles.

"Poison pill" amendments to restaurant carry: Although at least 43 states have some type of restaurant carry (including laws recently passed in Georgia, Arizona, Tennessee, Virginia, and Ohio) Reps. Ross and Jackson remain committed to stopping you from protecting your family in restaurants. If they can't remove it entirely, they will use "poison pill" amendments to induce the NC Restaurant & Lodging Assoc., which is currently neutral on the bill, to oppose it. 

In committee, Jackson first tried to require restaurants to post signs saying they either allow or prohibit concealed carry, claiming this would "allow restaurants to choose" while actually denying restaurant owners the choice of simply not getting involved in the debate at all by posting nothing.

 When restaurant association representative Frank Gray stated his opposition, the amendment failed. Next, Jackson tried requiring servers to act as cops by asking patrons whether they were "packing," and demanding permit-holders to qualify to law-enforcement marksmanship standards. 

"Yellow Star" Jackson: Reminiscent of Nazi's use of the yellow star inscribed with "Jude," Jackson then introduced an amendment to brand permit-holders by requiring their status to be displayed on drivers' licenses, so that every time you have to present an ID, you would be "outted." This amendment also failed. Lies about concealed handgun permit-holders: North Carolinians "Against Gun Violence" director Gail Neely stood before the committee to slander permit-holders, citing long-since discredited claims from "New York Times" reporter Michael Luo that permit-holders are criminals. But most telling, Neely perjured herself to the committee by regurgitating a study which she claimed dealt with concealed handgun permit-holders, despite the fact that GRNC President Paul Valone had two weeks prior produced a copy of the study for her (and the audience of an ACLU forum) demonstrating that her claims were clearly false. Remind legislators: Not only restaurant patrons are disarmed under current law, but also employees. In February, a Charlotte-area Red Lobster employee was shot during an armed robbery, adding yet another to the long list of restaurant victims like Danielle Watson, the Flying Biscuit Cafe manager brutally stabbed to death and left behind a dumpster.

England prospered from its slave labor-plantations of North America; New England slave ships profited greatly from the infamous “Rum Triangle” which brought African slaves to the New World; Eli Whitney of Massachusetts perpetuated slavery with his gin invention. New England slavers were still being caught off the coast of Cuba  as late as 1859.  The following is an excerpt from a speech by Zebulon B. Vance in the United States Senate, January 30, 1890.
Bernhard Thuersam, Chairman
North Carolina War Between the States Sesquicentennial Commission
"The Official Website of the North Carolina WBTS Sesquicentennial"

New England’s Commerce in Slaves:

“Several hundred years ago this fair land of ours, which it would seem God had specially intended for the seat of liberty and the noblest development of man, was desecrated by the introduction of human slavery.  The serpent thus entered into our political Eden. The great forests which covered the face of the earth called for labor to remove them, for more labor than the slowly coming immigration of the free races afforded. The morals of the age justified the holding of barbarous races in bondage. 

The favorite place for obtaining bondsmen was the African coast. So desirable did the supplying of the newly discovered islands and continents of the West with cheap labor appear, that old Joseph Hawkins was knighted by Queen Elizabeth, as much for his successful introduction of a cargo of slaves into the West Indies, as for his exploits against the Spaniards. Even so great an good a man as Las Casa, the Spanish apostle to the Indians, once advocated the introduction of African slavery.

First and foremost in this calamitous and iniquitous traffic was New England. In fact, so anxious were the good people of those colonies for slaves that they reduced to bondage the native Indians whom they captured in war, and, not infrequently, those wicked people of their own race and blood who were guilty of differing from them in religious opinions.

The tobacco-growing colonies of the South soon followed suit in the importation of African slaves, and early found how profitable this cheap and involuntary labor was in the raising of their great staple.  The introduction of the cultivation and uses of cotton soon gave a further impetus to slaveholding, and made the chief prosperity of all the Southern regions to depend mainly upon this enforced labor.  Whilst the want of profitable returns gradually lessened the hold of the North upon slavery, its great profits constantly increased that hold upon the South. 

The stony and sterile fields of New England called for manufactures and commerce. That commerce consisted very largely in purchasing slaves on the African coast, and selling them to Southern planters. After a time [slavery] ceased to exist altogether in the North, by reason of emancipation….and by their sales to their Southern neighbors. By this time the wrongfulness of holding slaves fully dawned upon the conscience of the Northern people. Its prickings became so active that they not only deemed it a sin to hold a slave themselves, but to permit anybody else to hold one, even though there was no responsibility whatever upon them for the transgression.

They even went so far in obeying the dictates of conscience, that they did not hesitate to stand up boldly in the sight of God, with the purchase money in their pockets, and denounce the vengeance of heaven against their Southern neighbors for holding on to the Negro which they themselves had sold them.”

Life of Zebulon B. Vance, Clement Dowd, Observer Printing and Publishing House, 1897, pp. 240-241)   

James Madison's fears have come to pass

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America."

-James Madison

Financial Panic and Copperhead Uprising

Not surprising was the resistance of the Northern war munitions industry to peace initiatives; after defeat in 1856 the new Republican party saw future victory in wooing northeastern industrialists through protective tariffs and corporate welfare schemes, and protecting their interests at the expense of the agricultural South.  In early 1864, Southern agents in Canada like Captain Thomas Hines rounded up Southern prisoners of war who escaped across the border to freedom, holding the most useful for his clandestine command and helping others return South via blockade runners to Wilmington.  From June 1864 on, Hines and the Confederate Commissioners planned bold moves to bring their enemy to the peace table.
Bernhard Thuersam, Chairman
North Carolina War Between the States Sesquicentennial Commission
"The Official Website of the North Carolina WBTS Sesquicentennial"

Financial Panic and Copperhead Uprising:

“While Hines rounded up the escaped prisoners of war to form his tiny “squadron,” as he would call it in later years, [Confederate Commissioner in Canada Jacob] Thompson set out for Niagara Falls to contact “potent men of the North” to learn how they felt about peace. Leading Copperheads like Fernando Wood, ex-mayor of New York City, and ex-governor Washington Hunt of New York, met with him at the Clifton House [hotel in Niagara Falls, Canada West]. New York and the East were not ready for peace or an uprising, they told Thompson. War [munitions] manufacturers there were too powerful and were on the alert to “neutralize” any peace efforts.

Thompson next turned to Secretary [Judah] Benjamin’s favorite project: trying to create a financial panic in the North by buying up gold and smuggling it out of the country in order to weaken the gold security for the Union dollar. A Nashville banker named Porterfield, who was living in exile in Montreal, was selected by Thompson as the proper man to set this in motion.

Porterfield was furnished with fifty thousand dollars. He went to New York, opened an office under a fictitious name and began to purchase gold, which he exported to England and sold for sterling bills of exchange. Then he converted the sterling bills into dollars which he used to buy more gold. The transaction was a costly one, showing a loss due to the cost of operations, trans-shipment, etc.  

Porterfield continued until his losses were twenty thousand dollars….[but by] this time he had exported five million dollars in gold, “and had induced many others to ship much more [gold].” His buying up gold and sending it out of the country began “showing a marked effect,” as Thompson said in his official report to Richmond, when the Federals cracked down.

A former partner of Porterfield’s was arrested by General Ben Butler for exporting gold, and thrown into Lafayette Prison in New York Harbor. Porterfield fled back to Canada….[but] still retained the twenty-five thousand dollars remaining to continue the exporting of gold through “fronts” in New York. 

By the first week of June, 1864, Hines was in touch with his Copperhead friends in Ohio, Indiana and Illinois and in communication with [Ohio gubernatorial candidate Clement] Vallandigham, who was now [exiled] in Windsor [Canada West].  A meeting was set for the 14th to plan the Copperhead uprising and the release of the Rebel prisoners in Camps Douglas, Morton, Chase and Rock Island.

Hines and Thompson met with Vallandigham on the 14th….[at] St. Catherines, Canada [West]…[and the latter] detailed for Hines the strength of the Copperheads. Membership totaled about 300,000. 

Illinois had furnished 80,000, Indiana, 50,000, Ohio, 40,000 and Kentucky and New York States, the rest.  A “feeling of fatigue” was sweeping through the North, Vallandigham told them, following Lincoln’s call for 500,000 more men….[and] he added: “If provocation and opportunity arise, gentlemen, there will be a general uprising.”

(Confederate Agent, A Discovery in History, James D. Horan, Crown Publishers, 1954, pp. 88-90)

Underage Dating: The Elephant in the Social Conservative Living-Room

Via Ryan

I have a bone to pick with young, socially conservative Americans, and I know it’s something that will get under your skin. Just sit tight, though, and hear me out, because the elephant in our tidy little room is starting to tear things up. It’s time we acknowledge his existence, and maybe even call in some animal movers to take him back to the zoo.

I currently live in a small community in the Bible-belt of the country and I have been given some opportunities to mentor young people from my area through different venues. I can count on one hand the kids I know from the local high school whose parents have never been divorced.  I’ve witnessed reactions of genuine surprise and envy from students who hear that my parents are still together. In any given conversation with groups of youth, I can expect to hear continual references to step-parents, step-siblings, and half-siblings. Divorce is a way of life down here – albeit one that has taken its toll in the lives of the young people that will make up the next generation.

However, while I could certainly write extensively on my experience with the negative effects of divorce on children and on society at large, I actually want to address something else entirely.  I have concerns about the number one way that our culture chooses to perpetuate the cancer of broken marriages and failed relationships– underage dating.

You can follow them on Facebook – the failed attempts at love, I mean.

Gun porn

Via mpopenker

The Haley Strategic Jack Carbine Built by BCM

Via randir_telemnar

Defy. Resist. Evade. Smuggle. SABOTAGE. You definitely should not do this........

Via avordvet

(Fill out multiples of the NY State Police Assault Weapons(s) Registration with the names and addresses of gun grabbers.) 



Do you know what happens when a wooden shoe is stuck in the mechanism of a windmill? It grinds to a halt. (It's a Dutch invention, I'm proud to say.)
 Do not, whatever you do, print a bunch of these out and fill them with false info and send them in.

More @ SSI

Marco Rubio: Corrupted by Washington in Only Two Years

Via avordvet

From Tea Party favorite to corrupt Washington insider in only two years, ladies and gentlemen, I give you Marco Rubio.


It’s hard to believe that Marco Rubio has only been in the Senate since January 2011. With the way he has been going on lately, telling conservatives what a bunch of unenlightened rubes we are for objecting to his immigration reform, you would think he’d been a Senator for 20 years.

The once Tea Party favorite, whose chances of being elected President are now on par with Mark Sanford, has been at the forefront of jamming the Democrat’s dream of opening the immigration floodgates through Congress, an effort that shares many the hallmarks of the passage of Obamacare:
  1. Put together in the dead of night by Washington insiders with zero transparency. Check.
  2. Rushing the bill through the legislative process as fast as humanly possible before the opposition can get their act together. Check.
  3. Refusing to accept even the barest hint of cooperation with Republicans who aren’t RINOs. Check.
  4. We’ll have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it! Check.
Representing everything the Tea Party movement has dedicated itself against Rubio is blazing a trail of lies and deceit that must make Obama proud.

Review of “Lincoln, The Man” by Edgar Lee Masters

 Via Tom 
                                   53rd NC
“The political history of America has been written for the most part by those who were unfriendly to the theory of a confederated republic, or who did not understand it. It has been written by devotees of the protective principle [i.e. a tariff], by centralists, and to a large degree by New England.”
- Edgar Lee Masters
“The American people, North and South, went into the war as citizens of their respective states, they came out subjects of the United States.”
- H. L. Mencken
“No war ever raging in my time was to me more foolish looking.”
- Thomas Carlyle
Both the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party and the intellectual wing of the Republican Party (insert joke here) want you to love Abraham Lincoln. If you’re like me, this is enough to convince you that you almost certainly don’t love Abraham Lincoln. There is, perhaps, no better tour guide on an anti-Lincoln journey than Masters.

Masters’ Lincoln is the first truly modern statesman (that is to say a wonderful politician, but not an actual statesman in the sense that he’s not leader and doesn’t have a governing philosophy). Lincoln lacks vision, conviction and any philosophical foundation. He says what needs to be said to please the crowd he’s in front of and what he says changes to fit the crowd. He has no fixed principles and no view of how government should work. He seeks to achieve and retain power. Perhaps that’s why he’s worshipped by both American political parties today. But, we’re getting ahead of ourselves . . .

More @ Foseti

App Academy Has New Idea for Tuition

Via Frank

The Proper Response to Tyranny


The proper response to tyranny is to oppose it with every resource at your command. After all, its design is to destroy you. But if you’re an average Southerner with a job and family, how do you oppose tyranny? That’s what we will explore. But first, let me give you an inspiring example of opposing tyranny when you are young and free of the responsibilities of job and family.

Once upon a time, young men of the West courageously went off to fight real tyranny—communism--in foreign lands. Let me give you an example that’s close to my heart—the once beautiful and fruitful country of Rhodesia.


In 1979, the British government, supported by the United States and the Western world in general, forced the conservative, pro-western administration of Prime Minister Ian Smith to cede control of Rhodesia to the forces of communist tyranny. White controlled Rhodesia thus became black communist controlled Zimbabwe in the following year. The infamous Lancaster House Agreement, which included as signatories the Soviet- and Chinese communist-backed Patriotic Front leaders Robert Mugabe (first and only President of Zimbabwe), head of ZANU—Zimbabwe African National Union--and Joshua Nkomo, head of ZAPU—Zimbabwe African Peoples Union—literally was a death warrant for the “Breadbasket of Africa” and eventually for thousands of white farm families who were unable to leave the country. What once had been a stable and productive civilized Western country in the middle of Africa became a leftist hell hole unable to sustain its own economic needs.

Though their respective governments stood as enemies to white Rhodesia (and to white South Africa as well), many a young man from the West answered the call and shouldered a FN-FAL in the 1970s to fight tyranny in the dark heart of Africa. And so it remains to this day.


“Wait,” you say. “The Bush War in Southern Africa was over more than three decades ago. Why do you say ‘so it remains to this day’?” My answer is simply this: Our western young men answered the clarion call then to defend their civilization in that far-flung land. If we are to indeed preserve the core—the very heart of the West—then they are going to have to answer that call for volunteers once again in our own day. Remember: the proper response to tyranny is to oppose it.

My generation—the Baby Boomers—has been rightly criticized for helping establish the climate that led to the decline of our civilization. You probably have heard of the infamous debauchery of the 1960s. But despite its overall degeneracy, my generation did have a solid minority of young men who understood what it meant to be . . . men. And only real men can summon a proper response to tyranny—to oppose, and, if possible, destroy it.

But now those young men of an earlier generation are growing old. We now have everyday responsibilities. And so do most of our young men. So it is back to our original question of exactly how do you oppose tyranny in your everyday lives without dropping everything and becoming a citizen-soldier?


Having said that, let me say this: you may indeed have to become a citizen-soldier, so make your preparations accordingly. No sane man wants war if there are other viable and honorable alternatives. But wise men prepare for all eventualities. And if you think I’m being alarmist, read what popular blogger Bob Owens wrote recently in an article entitled “Bloody Calculus” (4 April 2013): “. . . we must face the fact that we live in a time and place where there are good people who are calculating whether war, while horrible, is the worst of things.” He continues: “We live in a time where good people are weighing the loss of their own lives against the loss of freedoms their children and grandchildren may experience if our generation fails to stop a creeping tyranny.”

But what can you actively do today to stop that “creeping tyranny?” One thing you can do is speak the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may make you, to your family, friends, and associates. And despite the mainstream media’s blathering to the contrary, there is much truth to be had from alternative sources on the internet and from such publications as the one you are reading now. Spread this information around every chance you get. Put it in competition with the “official story” coming from the government and its propaganda organs. Teach those around you to develop a healthy skepticism.

Be an “information guerrilla.” What exactly does that entail? When I was in Northern Ireland back in the early 1980s, I noticed the creative graffiti decorating the walls and buildings, especially in places like Belfast. The slogan that I saw most often was “Brits Out of Northern Ireland.” You can do the same here. In fact, we have stickers that are being used in like manner all across the South (they adhere great to almost any flat surface!). The most popular of our slogans are: “Secede,” “Secede From Obamaland,” (Obamaland sounds likes some Third World hellhole in Africa), and “Feds Out of Dixie.” Get the message out and let the public see it.

Every elite ruling class throughout history has been dependent on “hewers of wood and drawers of water” (to use a phrase from Irish history). In other words, in their personal lives they need people to do almost every task from cooking their meals to providing their security. Furthermore, in their official capacity they cannot run a Police and Surveillance State without plenty of employees serving as their eyes and ears, hands and feet, out here in the boondocks. While there are plenty of creative ways to “gum up the works” on an everyday basis (be creative here!), the best way to make this Leviathan grind to a halt is simple: don’t provide these services to them! Walk away and leave them un-served, blind, deaf, and lame. And for those among you who refuse to give up a lucrative job of serving the tyrants, you can begin by social and economic ostracization. That is, refuse to acknowledge their existence in your community, otherwise known as giving them the “cold shoulder.” Should things deteriorate even further, these lackeys will be the first to draw other types of attention from local Southern patriots.

Use politics—as far as it will take us. If tyranny can be effectively opposed by politics, then sane men will use this means to attain their goal. But what if politics fail us? If tyranny cannot be destroyed by political means, broadly defined, then only a fool would stop there and admit failure. To do so would be not only cowardly but suicidal. We must be willing to take things beyond the political realm, if necessary.


Carl von Clausewitz once wrote that “war is the continuation of politics by other means.” He was right. When political tactics fail to protect one side against the depredations of the other, then the side that is threatened with dispossession and even death is required by necessity to resort to those “other means.” Americans—especially Southerners—are political junkies. Politics is the answer to every question. But if our warriors are willing only to engage in political warfare—and that only—then when politics fail they will have no alternative. They must be willing to accept Clausewitz’s dictum as true if they are not to be thwarted by a rigged political system in the U.S.

Above I gave you the example of young Western men fighting against tyranny and for their civilization in southern Africa in the 1970s. So if Western men in past times were willing to fight for their civilization in remote areas of the world shouldn’t we expect them to be just as willing to fight for that civilization here at its very heart—the South? To paraphrase the great Patrick Henry, is life so precious and peace so dear that we will purchase them with our very freedoms? Are modern Western men mere emasculated shadows of their fathers? God forbid it!

If the proper response to tyranny is to oppose it, then that necessitates that there be those willing to do the hard and dirty work of actually destroying it. And because tyranny often hides itself behind seemingly lawful regimes, its destruction requires the efforts of men whose courage overcomes the fear of being braded “outlaws,” “rebels,” and even “traitors.” Moreover, it requires men who are willing to face death or imprisonment from the heavy hand of the tyrant. In other words, it’s serious business not to be undertaken lightly.

Even if you are too old or simply not cut out to be a warrior, there are still plenty of ways you can assist those who are on the frontlines, as it were. There is an old and true saying among military men that dabblers are concerned with tactics while men of experience are concerned with logistics. If you are not able to fight you can still provide the logistics network for those who can. Use your imagination and resources to be putting this network together now!


Earlier, I quoted Bob Owens who believes were face a “creeping tyranny.” I think it should be characterized as “galloping.” Events are moving at a quickening pace. The current occupant of the White House represents one side of a counterfeit coin. That coin is an aggressive admixture of globalism, fascism-progressivism, crony capitalism, and democratic socialism all rolled into one. The traditions and truths of Western Christendom are anathema to the regime. The tyrants’ regime and Western Christendom cannot co-exist—that is not possible. One must win and the other must disappear. It is indeed the ultimate Zero Sum game.

And we, the side of Western Christendom, cannot win if we do not understand and then act upon the proper response to tyranny. Tyrants cannot be bargained with because there is no truth in them. They cannot be trusted because their wellspring is the Father of Lies. And they cannot be abided because they are dangerous beasts that devour their prey. They must be opposed—and they must for the very sake of our progeny be destroyed.

We men of the 21st century owe those young warriors in the bush of Rhodesia in the 1970s, as well as all the Western warriors through the ages who have made a stand at their own personal Battle of Tours, Lepanto, or the Gates of Vienna, a debt that can only be paid by our own sacrifice. The survival of our very civilization is at stake.

Dr. Michael Hill
Killen, Alabama

DHS training video depicts gun owners as 'militia members' planning terrorism

Via avordvet

The YouTube channel Patriot News Organization on Thursday uploaded a training video from the Department of Homeland Security that depicts a fake news broadcast about a police SWAT team raiding an American house and arresting "extremist" members of a “local militia group” for possession of illegal firearms and planning to commit terrorist attacks.

“Very disturbing video straight from DHS website - they use it to help train all of the deputized agencies during a crisis, even hospital administrators, media faces, everything and everyone that would be involved in such an event,” reads the Patriot News Organization’s description of the video.

Exactly when the video was made is unclear, but the video description links to a DHS website featuring documents that were uploaded in 2009 and 2012.

In the video, a fake local news anchor comes on the screen with breaking news.

“Reports of possible illegal activity by a local militia group appears to have spurred law enforcement into action,” the anchor says.

The video then cuts to “John Gleason” at the site in front of a house with fake fire fighters and SWAT officers swarming the area.

“This is the scene of an intensive investigation into the operations of an extremist group reportedly planning a series of terrorist attacks on U.S. cities,” Gleason says. “Details are sketchy, but allegedly the militia was using this house to store a cache of military weapons.”

More @ Examiner