Thursday, October 20, 2016

WIKILEAKS Warns Tim Kaine and Donna Brazile: You’re Next

Via Billy

On Thursday Wikileaks released Barack Obama’s emails to Hillary.
His pseudonym was

(Not very creative!) [Love it! :) ]

Maybe this is why Obama let Hillary off the hook? He knew his emails were all over her server.
(Even though he lied about it!)

Tonight Wikileaks warned DNC Chairperson Donna Brazile and vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine: You’re Next!

General Lee’s New Ideas in Education

An astute man.

The other General Lee, and not kin to the more famous one, Stephen Dill Lee was a veteran of the early Virginia campaigns, Vicksburg, the Atlanta Campaign, and ended the war with Gen. Joseph E. Johnston in North Carolina. After 1865 Lee was deeply involved in reviving his own plantation, and later dedicated his life, as Robert E. Lee did earlier, to educating young Southern men who faced the challenge of rebuilding their devastated country. In late April 1906, he delivered a speech in New Orleans to the sons of the men he led in battle. In his remarks he said:

“To you, sons of Confederate veterans, we will commit the vindication of the cause for which we fought. To your strength will be given the defense of the Confederate soldiers’ good name, the guardianship of his history, the emulation of his virtues, the perpetuation of those principles which he loved and which you love also, and those ideals which made him glorious and which you also cherish.”
Bernhard Thuersam,   The Great American Political Divide

General Lee’s New Ideas in Education

“In 1880 General Lee became the first president of the Mississippi Agricultural and Mechanical College, now Mississippi State University. [The father] of industrial education in the South, no other citizen had such a far-reaching and penetrating influence upon the agricultural and industrial development of the Southern States.

Lee advanced in his day a new thought to Southern-bred collegians. He believed that education and manual labor should go together.

In making his first report to his Board of Trustees, he said: “All students are required to work from two to three hours a day . . . on the farm, among the stock, in the garden . . . shops or grounds . . . Our experience shows that students who work . . . stand highest in their classes and enjoy better health. It also inculcates and retains habits of industry at that period of life when education is being obtained . . . It makes labor honorable and demonstrates that labor and a high standard of liberal and scientific education are not incompatible, and go hand-in-hand with the struggle of life, and in developing our industries and resources . . .”

Lee warned the South that unless its farmers learned the science of modern agriculture their lands would be owned by strangers. “Knowledge is power,” he said, “in every department of life – as important to the farmer as the professional man.”

He foresaw that electricity would play in the industrialization of the South, and in his report of 1893 he wrote:

“I deem it most important that the boys of Mississippi be instructed in an electrical laboratory to fit them for industrial pursuits now just ahead.” That same year he began a crusade for an appropriation to equip such a laboratory and provide electric lights for the college grounds and dormitories.

At times combatting an unsympathetic legislature and the hosts of ignorance, “Old Steve,” as he was affectionately called, pioneered with new methods of instruction and introduced departments in the mechanical arts and engineering.

Experiments at the college revealed the surprising fact that cotton seed, which had been a waste and a liability, had a feed and food value, and a new industry emerged from the soil. The first creamery in the Gulf States was established at the college and the foundation laid for a more diversified agricultural development.

Under Lee’s leadership the advantages of diversified agriculture and drainage were fully demonstrated and the value of scientific farming definitely proved among a people whose methods were comparatively primitive.

The cultivation of better grasses and the introduction of improved herds changed the agricultural complexion of the “Magnolia State” [and] graduates went forth with a new faith in farming. The development of this new idea in education spread to other States and created a demand for students to fill positions as teachers, managers of farms and creameries, and professors and instructors in other agricultural colleges and at agricultural experiment stations.

Stephen Dill Lee died in 1908. In the devastation that followed in the wake of Appomattox, with a social order disrupted, an economic system destroyed, and the flower of Southern manhood killed or maimed, Lee the soldier became a builder.”

(Sons of the South, Clayton Rand, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961, pg. 160)

Nullification vs. Secession?

 fort moultrie

On the 21st of this June, Americans celebrated the 228th anniversary of the nation’s Constitution, making it the world’s oldest existing governing body of laws. It was then that our founding fathers met in their effort to form a union more perfect than the one under which the thirteen sovereign states had been operating since 1781, the original Articles of Confederation. While the new document was written and ratified in a far different age by men who certainly could not have foreseen what their new nation would become more than two-and-a-quarter centuries in the future, their extraordinary prescience has allowed the basic document to withstand the tests of time and travail. As proof of this, aside from the first ten amendments to the Constitution (eleven, if one counts the latest Congressional salary amendment in 1992 which was ratified over 202 years after its initial submission with the Bill of Rights in 1789), out of the more than 11,500 changes that have been proposed by Congress over the years, our nation has seen fit to actually amend the original document a mere sixteen additional times.

Even though the new Constitution injected the hope of insuring domestic tranquility, the following seven decades of the nation’s history were anything but tranquil.

Three Reasons Why Trump’s Debate Answer About Accepting The Election Results Was EXACTLY RIGHT

Via David

In the next 24 hours and coming days, Democrats and their media allies will focus on a singular moment in the third and last 2016 presidential debate.
Debate moderator Chris Wallace of FOX News asked Donald Trump if he will accept the result of the election. It was ironic because Trump was asked an identical question about the results of the Republican primary during the first GOP primary debate in August of 2015 by a debate moderator from FOX News. It should also be pointed out that Hillary denounced Trump’s response but never answered the same question directly.

In the next 24 hours and coming days, Democrats and their media allies will focus on a singular moment in the third and last 2016 presidential debate.
Debate moderator Chris Wallace of FOX News asked Donald Trump if he will accept the result of the election. It was ironic because Trump was asked an identical question about the results of the Republican primary during the first GOP primary debate in August of 2015 by a debate moderator from FOX News. It should also be pointed out that Hillary denounced Trump’s response but never answered the same question directly.

Expect a full-on non-stop attack from Democrats and the media about this which will be framed as Donald Trump being a threat to American democracy.

The attacks will be complete garbage and Donald Trump is absolutely right. Here are three reasons why:

1. The Media: The media has repeatedly made it clear that they’re on the side of Hillary Clinton and that they want to destroy Donald Trump. We’ve had media bias in the past but nothing on the scale of what we’ve seen in this election. Don’t you think the media will be in a mad rush to declare a Clinton victory on election night? You better believe they will.

2. Voter Fraud: Democrats have engaged in voter fraud over the years but again, we’ve never seen it on the scale that’s happening in this election. Investigations are under way in Colorado, Indiana and Virginia. Not to mention the recent explosive videos from James O’Keefe. Do you accept that? Of course not. Why should Trump?

3. Democrats in 2000: Democrats did not accept the results of the 2000 election in which George W. Bush bested Al Gore. They fought it in congress, they fought it in the media, they fought it throughout Bush’s presidency.

NBC Insider: “Trump was leading in the polls, so the tape was leaked to derail his bid”

Via David

Gee, a network news outlet conspiring to destroy a GOP candidate? Imagine that.

NBC execs are rumored to have leaked the despicable Donald Trump “grab ’em by the p - - - y” tape to the Washington Post in a bid to influence the presidential race, sources tell Page Six.

But NBC News is also holding back a potentially damaging tape of Hillary Clinton.

No, Hillary Clinton, The Supreme Court’s Heller Decision Wasn’t About Toddlers

Via John

No, Hillary Clinton, The Supreme Court’s Heller Decision Wasn’t About Toddlers

Hillary Clinton claimed the Heller decision was about toddlers. It was actually about whether a 66-year-old police officer had the right to keep a gun at home.

During the final presidential debate on Wednesday night, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told another unbelievable whopper about the country’s gun laws. In her answer to a question about her views on gun rights, Clinton said she opposed the Supreme Court’s Heller decision, which recognized the constitutional right for individuals to own and carry firearms, because it was about whether toddlers should have guns.

Yes, she said that.

It’s a lie so absurd that I honestly don’t know where to begin, but I’ll give it a shot:

Par For The Course: WIKILEAKS: Hillary Took Algeria Off Terror Watch List After Donation to Clinton Foundation

Via Billy

hillary isis

A new Wikileaks document reveals Hillary took Algeria off the US terror watch list after they made a hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation’s Haiti relief project.

How is that legal?

The Clinton camp was discussing Joe Scarborough’s discussion on the Algerian donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton advisors defended the move in the email saying it’s “legal gray area.”

Just found out @JamesOKeefeIII has audio of Creamer and WH.

Via comment by Anonymous on No, Hillary, 17 U.S. Intelligence Agencies Did Not...

Just found out has audio of Creamer and WH. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

More @ Twitter


James-OKeefe and Robert Creamer Getty:Screenshot

Exclusive: O’Keefe Responds to White House False Claims About 340 Creamer Visits

The Obama White House attempted to do damage control in a press conference Wednesday after a question was asked about Democratic operative Robert Creamer’s numerous visits to the White House.

In an exclusive interview with James O’Keefe – the filmmaker and investigative journalist behind the blockbuster videos that forced the resignation of Robert Creamer from the Hillary Clinton campaign – Breitbart News has learned that more material connecting Creamer and the White House is on the way.

When asked about Obama’s relationship with Creamer, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters, “I’m not sure that there is much of one,” and added, “I know that they’ve met before.”

According to publicly available White House visitor logs, Creamer has visited the White House 340 times in the past seven years. During that period he has visited the POTUS himself at least 45 times, and in 2008 and 2012 “he worked with the Democratic National Committee as a consultant to the Obama Presidential Campaign coordinating field-based rapid response to Republican Presidential candidates.”

More @ Breitbart

Megyn Kelly vs. Donna Brazile: Did You Receive Debate Question Beforehand?; Brazile: I Will Not Be "Persecuted"

Via Billy

DNC interim chairwoman Donna Brazile categorically denied that she received a debate question on the death penalty in advance in an interview with Megyn Kelly after the third presidential debate (unrelated to the debate in question). The question was for a Democratic primary town hall hosted by CNN and co-moderated by Roland Martin, the journalist who asked it at the forum. This information was revealed in a recent Wikileaks dump of John Podesta's emails.

"From time to time I get the questions in advance," the email subject was titled in a letter written from Brazile delivered to Podesta's Gmail.

The email read:

No, Hillary, 17 U.S. Intelligence Agencies Did Not Say Russia Hacked Dem E-mails

Via Billy
Hillary Clinton in last night’s presidential debate tried to avoid talking about the substance of the damaging WikiLeaks disclosures of DNC and Clinton campaign officials by claiming 17 U.S. intelligence agencies determined that Russia was responsible for this. After Clinton made this claim, she scolded Trump for challenging U.S. intelligence professionals who have taken an oath to help defend this country. What Clinton said was false and misleading. First of all, only two intelligence entities – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – have weighed in on this issue, not 17 intelligence agencies. And what they said was ambiguous about Russian involvement. An unclassified October 7, 2016 joint DNI-DHS statement on this issue said the hacks.
More @ NRO

Malik Obama Thinks Hillary May Have Cheated During Debate

Via Billy

malik barack

Malik Obama, Barack Obama’s half brother, was invited to the debate last night in Las Vegas.
Malik was sitting with the Trump supporters during the Las Vegas debate.

This morning Malik suggested that Hillary may have cheated during the debate last night.
Malik was not the only one.

Several Twitter users thought Hillary Clinton was reading a script during the debate.
For the record…

Via WIkileaks– Hillary Clinton was caught reading a script to MSNBC during a previous interview:


Via David

Imagine if your house address is the same as the address of a home healthcare provider. But that is the case of Chelsea Clinton’s apartment  at  THE WHITMAN BUILDING, 21 EAST 26TH STREET, 4TH FLOOR- FLATIRON DISTRICT, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10010.  The Whitman Building is a luxury residential building, not commercial, so it is impossible for METROCARE HOME SERVICES, INC.   to operate in that same place.

How do you explain this? They have the same address on the same floor and there is only one apartment per floor in the building.


More @ 70 News

Just HOURS After Debate Wikileaks Hits Hillary With Hardest Blow Yet…

Via Billy

Just HOURS After Debate Wikileaks Hits Hillary With Hardest Blow Yet...

Hillary Clinton engaged in pay for play at the State Dept.

No rational person can really argue that at this point.

A lot of people have been waiting for a “smoking gun” to be revealed by WikiLeaks.

Even though that’s completely unnecessary. We know enough to know she did something really bad.

But WikiLeaks may have just provided that smoking gun anyway.
From Twitchy:
The 13th batch of John Podesta’s hacked emails from WikiLeaks is out and this one caught our eye. Maybe Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, Robby Mook and the Clinton Global Initiative can tell us more about this $12 million donation in exchange for a meeting with Hillary Clinton?

Donna Brazile on claims Democrats incited campaign violence

Via Billy

SUNY professor, who correctly predicted the victor in every presidential election since 1996, says Trump win at least 87 percent certain; other polls 'bunk

Via Billy

 Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at the South Florida Fairgrounds in West Palm Beach, Fla

".............running the model on earlier campaigns comes up with the correct outcome for every race since 1912, except the 1960 election." (Which we know was stolen)

 A SUNY professor continues to project Donald Trump as the likely winner of this year's election and he's critiquing polls that predict the opposite in a new opinion piece.

Helmut Norpoth has been predicting a Trump victory since early this year. His model currently projects a win for the Republican with a certainty of 87 to 99 percent.

Norpoth is a professor at Stony Brook University on Long Island.

More  @ Syracuse

Satire: Obama's mother-in-law will receive a lifetime $60K government pension for baby

Via Charlie

& I now remember (thanks to the comment below) that the Boston Tribune is satire.  Sorry.  It used to be a respected paper, went out of business and started up recently in their new format.

First Grandma Marian Robinson, 79, will receive a lifetime 160K government pension when she leaves the White House next year, according to congressional budget statements.

According to documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Mrs. Robinson earned the lifetime pension for “services rendered as full-time/in-home caregiver” for granddaughters Malia, 18, and Sasha, 15, during President Obama’s two terms in office.

In January of 2009, it was reported that Mrs. Robinson was living in the White House full-time to tend to her granddaughters. She was the first live-in grandmother at the White House since Elivera M. Doud, the mother of Mamie Eisenhower, during the Eisenhower Administration.

Critics say Mrs. Robinson should not profit from something as simple as taking care of family. Sally Kellner, volunteer/activist for the National Taxpayers Union, says this is a prime example of needless spending. “I think it’s ridiculous that taxpayers must pay this woman a lifetime salary for something everyday Americans do for free. We take care of our families because we love them, not for profit.”

When asked if Mrs. Robinson’s lifetime pension was justified, Senator Mike Enzi (R-WY), Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, declined to comment but said a special oversight committee would review all post-Obama Administration budgetary obligations.

Facing America's Decline Into Another Civil War.

Via comment by JWMJR on your post The Hillary VirusP: Corrupting our government, one...

America is a nation in decline. Sadly it is a decline that is as much or more one of deliberate manufacture as it is one of historical entropy. The signs are all around us but no one in the political class or the 4th estate possesses the courage to openly face it or call out those responsible for it, well because it is that same political class and the 4th estate that bear the largest responsibility for it. Eight years ago we were fed a massive caravan of horse shit under the rubric of "Hope and Change". It didn't take a genius to see at the time that it was all a lie, but anyone who dared point that out was ignored, silenced or condemned as a slow witted racist at best if not a card carrying member of the KKK at worst. Nevermind that all one had to do was read Obama's own works to see that he was/is just as racist as any real Klan member.

No, no we were told. Judging the man by the words of his own discriptions would be so unfair. We must confine our judgements to the perspectives of the politicians and pundits who supported him and the lofty rhetoric of his latest stump speech. Drawing any inference as to his character by that of those with whom he had long associated or self defined as his roll models and mentors would just be to unfair. His history was irrelevant. All that mattered was what he said subsequent to announcing his candidacy and in the historical significance of his being the first black man to be nominated by a major political party.