Saturday, October 10, 2015

OW! Marine Le Pen lashes out at Hollande and Merkel

She reamed them a new one. :) 

Here is Marine Le Pen's short but cogent speech in the EU Parliament yesterday where she had the opportunity to address for the first time both Angela Merkel and François Hollande.
Thank you Madame Merkel for coming here today with your Vice-Chancellor, the administrator of the province of France. Mr. Vice-Chancellor, I would like to be able to call you president of the French Republic, out of respect for your office, but you do not exercise this presidency any more than your predecessor did. A French president would not be able to say "sovereignism means declinism", as you have just done, because a French president upholds the French constitution, and Title 1 of the French Constitution is "On sovereignty". 
A French president cannot constantly ignore the interests of France. The interests of France do not mean blind submission to policies decided upon in Berlin, Brussels, or Washington. France's interests are your duty, that of defending her sovereignty. The interests of France are not about presenting a sorry spectacle of a France attached to Germany on the question of migrants. 
When, in a completely irresponsible act Madame Merkel says it is necessary to welcome with open arms 800,000 migrants, you applaud. When, a few days later, she suspends Schengen and wants to control her borders, you applaud again, giving a pitiful image of France as a country at sea, vacillating on an issue that is so essential to the security, prosperity and identity of France! 
The interests of France are not about abdicating to Dr. Schäuble when the economic policy of the continent is decided upon. This policy is synonymous with massive unemployment, with precariousness, and the collapse of our social welfare system. On the contrary, we should resist and prevent Greece and other countries of southern Europe, and France, from plunging into the endless spiral of austerity in order to save the euro and the German economic model of low salaries.
More @ Gallia Watch

Russian jet reportedly 'shot down by Turkish force

Via sauced07

 It has been claimed by eyewitnesses that there was a large explosion in Huraytan, northern Syria, not far from the Turkish border, while three fighter planes were seen overhead

If this actually occurred, it was a dumb move on the part of Turkey.  Lets hope it's bogus.


Turkish forces are said to have shot down a Russian jet after it flew into the country's airspace, according to unconfirmed reports on social media.

It has been claimed by eyewitnesses that there was a large explosion in Huraytan, northern Syria, while three fighter planes were seen overhead.
Rumours of a jet being shot out of the sky come amid heightening tensions between Russian president Vladimir Putin and the West.

More @ Daily Mail

U.S. Army hearing officer recommends no jail for Bergdahl

Via sauced07 

Desertion during war is a capital offense. At least is was when I was in. No one should join these days.

  The U.S. military officer who headed a hearing in the case of accused deserter Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl recommended that the man held captive by the Taliban in Afghanistan should not be sent to a military prison, Bergdahl's lawyers said.

Lieutenant Colonel Mark Visger, the presiding officer at the so-called Article 32 hearing last month in San Antonio, also made recommendations in a memorandum this week for Bergdahl's case to be moved to the military equivalent of misdemeanor court, the lawyers said.

More @ Yahoo

"............the most spectacular US foreign policy debacle since Vietnam."

Via sauced07

One week ago, when summarizing the current state of play in Syria, we said that for Obama, "this is shaping up to be the most spectacular US foreign policy debacle since Vietnam." Yesterday, in tacit confirmation of this assessment, the Obama administration threw in the towel on one of the most contentious programs it has implemented in "fighting ISIS", when the Defense Department announced it was abandoning the goal of a U.S.-trained Syrian force.

But this, so far, partial admission of failure only takes care of one part of Obama's problem: there is the question of the "other" rebels supported by the US, those who are not part of the officially-disclosed public program with the fake goal of fighting ISIS; we are talking, of course, about the nearly 10,000 CIA-supported "other rebels", or technically mercenaries, whose only task is to take down Assad.

The same "rebels" whose fate the AP profiles today when it writes that the CIA began a covert operation in 2013 to arm, fund and train a moderate opposition to Assad. Over that time, the CIA has trained an estimated 10,000 fighters, although the number still fighting with so-called moderate forces is unclear.

More @ Zero Hedge

John McCain and the POW Cover-Up - 10 Key Pieces of Evidence That Men Were Left Behind 2010

Via Wes
Kerry Wall Blood

Kerry And His Mystical Khmer Dau (Rouge)


John McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn’t return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero who people would logically imagine as a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books.

Polling for Moderate Muslims: The High Risks of Muslim Immigration

Mike Scruggs

A 2015 poll by the Center for Security Policy (CSP) indicated that 33 percent of American-Muslims believe Sharia (Islamic Law) should be supreme over the U.S. Constitution. Another 24 percent either didn’t know or wouldn’t say. But 43 percent of Muslim-Americans polled apparently believe that the U.S. Constitutions should have precedence over Sharia. Another way of asking the question indicated that 51 percent of American-Muslims polled believed they should have the choice of choosing U.S. law or Sharia. The same 43 percent disagreed, saying that U.S. law should prevail.

But are Muslims likely to tell the truth to pollsters about how they feel about Sharia versus U.S. Law?  The Koranic-based  near-identical doctrines of Taqiyya (Shia Muslim) and Muda’rat (Sunni Muslim) should give well-warranted pause to accepting the accuracy of Western polls or State Department questionnaires and interviews regarding  Muslim sympathies for Jihad, violence against non-Muslims, terrorism, and commitment to Islamic Law  versus Western systems of law.

These doctrines justify deception when advancing or defending Islam. In other words, Muslims are likely to deny any sympathy with terrorism, Jihad, commitment to Sharia, and their motivation for immigration, when challenged by non-Muslims. These doctrines closely resemble Communist and Nazi doctrines that truth and right are whatever it takes to accomplish their objectives.  Despite the widespread pipe-dream that the vast majority of Muslims are moderates, according to the 2015 CSP poll above, an absolute maximum of 43 percent of American-Muslims could be classified as moderate. The actual number of moderates may be much lower.

“Moderate” Muslims appear to be more common in the United States than predominantly Muslim countries. A World Public Opinion poll from February 2009 indicated that 61 percent of Egyptians approved of attacks on Americans, and 34 percent disagreed.  The same poll indicated that 83 percent of Palestinian Muslims approve of terrorist groups like Hamas. Palestinian Muslims appear to be at the top of the violently anti-Western category.

 It is easy to see the potential problem to Israel.  Asked the same questions, 62 percent of Jordanian Muslims approved of terrorist groups, and only 21 percent were opposed. Turkey’s traditional secularized Islam was evident in the poll with only 42 percent approving of Muslim terrorist groups and 45 percent disapproving. But how moderate is that, when probably more than half may favor terrorist groups? At 2006 People’s Press poll indicated that 31 percent of Turks approved of suicide attacks against Americans in Iraq.

Pew Research polls in 2007 and 2011 indicated that about 8 percent of American-Muslims agreed that suicide bombings are justified, but a similar poll in 2013 indicated that those who believed suicide attacks were at least partially justified ran to 19 percent. Among younger American-Muslims, it ran to 26 percent in the 2011 poll.  Forty-two percent of young Muslims in France believe suicide bombings are justified. In Europe as well as in America, young Muslims are more likely to believe violence against non-Muslins is justified. Pew also found that American-Muslins who identified strongly with their religion were three times as likely as others to believe suicide bombings are justified. A June 2015 poll revealed 38 percent of American-Muslims agreed that the Islamic State (ISIS) is doctrinally correct in their Islamic theology, and 43 percent disagreed.

A 2010 Pew Research poll indicated that 84 percent of Egyptian Muslims, 86 percent of Jordanian Muslims, and 76 percent of Pakistani Muslims support the death penalty for Muslims who leave Islam.  This is part of Sharia, which is based on the Koran and teachings of Muhammad.  A Motivaction survey in 2014 indicated that 80 percent of young Dutich-Muslims saw nothing wrong with Jihad against unbelievers. A majority voiced some support for ISIS.

A Terrorism Research Institute study in 2011 indicated that 84.5 percent of imams teaching at

American mosques recommended violence-positive texts. There are approximately 2,200 mosques in the U.S.  The traditions of the Koran and Sharia also discourage assimilation and condemn democracy as depending on the wisdom of men rather than Allah.

Rape Epidemic in Swedish Absurdistan

Another area of cultural shock in Western countries with significant Muslim immigration is the crime rate, and especially disproportional sexual crimes against the host country’s women. In Sweden, which does not usually report the nationality of rapists,  a just released study by Swedish Police revealed that Muslim men, who constitute only 2 percent of the population are responsible for 77.6 percent of rapes, giving once peaceful Sweden the highest rape rate in Europe and the second highest in the world, next to South Africa. This shocking explosion of sexual crime by Muslim men in Sweden and elsewhere is probably related to the Muslim doctrines of Hijra (immigration) and Jihad (Holy War).

The young immigrants evidently view their presence in Sweden as Civilization Jihad, entitling them to the sexual spoils of war. For a good example of rape as a Jihad entitlement, see the October 9 Daniel Greenfield article in on the Islamic State.  Sharia law also makes male conviction for rape extremely unlikely, because four male witnesses are required for conviction, and the raped females are considered suspect in their sexual behavior. Gang rapes once unknown in Sweden have become common.  In 1975, 421 rapes were reported in Sweden. There were 6,620 in 2014.

Sweden has become a politically correct nightmare, where authorities are reluctant to risk offending multicultural sensitivities.

According to Paul Joseph Watson, writing in the February 19 edition of,  Swedish Courts often seem remarkably sympathetic to rapists and harsh to victims.

Blowing the whistle on the Muslim rape epidemic in Sweden can be costly. Michael Hess, a leader of the conservative Sweden Democrat Party, was convicted of a “hate-speech” crime of “denigrating an ethic group” in bringing the rape crisis to public attention. In 2014, Swedish Police released a list of 55 “No-go” zones, where Muslim gangs have taken control, and even police and ambulance crews are at risk to enter. Conditions are only slightly less severe in the U.K., Norway, and Denmark, and becoming worse in all of Europe. 

So what are the risk levels of taking in 100,000 predominantly younger male Syrian Sunni Muslim refugees per year into the United Nations and U.S. State Department Refugee Resettlement Program? First of all, no more than half have proved to be Syrian. How many are we willing to take in six South Carolina counties specified in Governor Nikki Haley’s 2016 Refugee Resettlement Plan?   How many of these refugees that the FBI has testified to Congress that they cannot vet will North Carolina take?

How many  thousands of lives, are we willing to risk so liberal politicians of both political parties and misguided low-information clergy can feel good about themselves? Who will be accountable for bringing the inevitable increase in violent sexual crimes against women and children? If you are in denial, check,,, and

There is a minority of “safely moderate” secularized or cultural Muslims in the world, but the unacceptably high probability of bringing death, disease, destruction, and crime to our own people to make a home for fairy-tale moderate Muslims shouts loudly against the risk. Making immigration a sacred cow is proving to be an extraordinarily dangerous and foolish policy. We are in such danger that we should call a moratorium on all Muslim immigration. In fact, our immigration policies have become so corrupt and dangerous that we should have a three-year moratorium on all immigration that does not involve substantial immediate family hardship.

"Shut the hell up and come and take them. You can start at my house."

Via Michael

Stirring myself to the right words after One of Those Tragedies always takes a while. First, there’s the dragged-down feeling of “here we go again.” The antis rush gleefully on stage to perform their blood dances and once again, decent people need to respond to them, if for no other reason than to keep the record straight.

We can’t even stop to speak with decency and sympathy for the horrible losses because to speak at all is to become political. And that’s obscene.

Mass murders, whether by bomb or knife or vehicle or poison, are horrific individual tragedies. But mass murders by firearm result in a dreary sameness.

Except this time.

Syrian forces liberate village in Hama Province

Via u_96 

Extremely low flying Russian Air Force gunships target terrorists in Hama

Syrian government forces have gained more grounds against foreign-backed militants, taking control of a village in the western-central province of Hama.

The Syrian forces on Saturday captured the village of Atshan from Takfiri militants, including Al-Qaeda-affiliated al-Nusra Front, state television reported on Saturday.

Earlier in the day, Syria’s official news agency SANA reported that over 120 militants have been killed in Hama.

The development came a day after Syrian soldiers managed to wrest complete control of al-Bahsa Village in the al-Suqaylabiyah district of Hama, killing 104 terrorists and destroying seven vehicles equipped with heavy machine guns and medium-caliber long-barreled guns.

More @ Press TV

We must be mad to risk allowing Jihadists on our soil - Nigel Farage

Via comment by Quartermain on Europe Riots: Mass Outrage Over Mass Immigration

Comrade Dewey and Others–Cultural Genocide as a Sacred Mission–Part Two

Via comment by Quartermain on Believe It Or Not…

In going through the mass of documentation Sam Blumenfeld and Alex Newman have provided in their book Crimes of the Educators  you are forced to come up with the conclusion that these so-called educators had one thing in mind–the total destruction of anything that could be called a true Americanist culture. Dewey. though more prominent than most, wasn’t the first.The generation of “teachers” preceding Dewey ardently worked at this in the Southern states after the War of Northern Aggression. Like most leftists they mislabeled what they were doing in order to baffle the general public. In that case they chose a Marxist term, one employed by Marx himself–“reconstruction” which was really deconstruction. Dewey, in his time, continued to play the game, taking it to another level.

As I’ve said many times before “reconstruction is ongoing.”

How the West lost the Cold War

Via comment by Quartermain on Europe Riots: Mass Outrage Over Mass Immigration
The one real achievement that conservatives can point to in the last fifty years is winning the Cold War. But did conservatives really win the Cold War? I would suggest that the Cold War was won by liberals, and that it represented yet another defeat for conservatives. Conservatives lost because as usual they were fighting the wrong war in the wrong place against the wrong enemy.
The real enemy was not the Soviet Union. Do not misunderstand me. I am no admirer of Soviet communism. But the real enemy was not the Soviet Union, it was the enemy within - liberalism. It was liberalism that sought to destroy everything worthwhile in western civilisation. The end of the Cold War strengthened liberalism enormously.

Fred for Dictator!: Good as Any, Better’n Some :)


If you were an evil dictator, would you mess with this man?

Having recognized that the country is calling on me to restore order and common sense, and that my election as dictator is the last hope of Western Civilization, I hereby throw my sombrero into the ring. Below is a compact summary of the wise and forward-looking policies which will characterize my reign. Interposed are thrilling slogans that will throw you into an electoral frenzy.

Social Policy: On the day of my coronation, I will undertake a sweeping reform of society, beginning with radical feminists. We will hunt them with dogs. I will save a few and chain them in the Great Dismal Swamp, where they will poison the mosquitoes, allowing civilized people to catch catfish in comfort.

“The only thing we have to be A-fred of is Fred Hisself!!”

I will revive horsewhipping.

Hitler Actor says German people begged him to bring back labour camps and posed for selfies as right-wing extremism surges

Via Jeffery

Oliver Masucci plays the Nazi leader (pictured in character) in 'He's Back' ('Er ist wieder da'), a biting social satire by author Timur Vermes which was released in German cinemas this week

An actor dressed as Hitler on the streets of Germany was begged to bring back labour camps, kissed and made to feel like 'a pop star' - casting an uncomfortable light on growing support for right-wing extremism in the country.

Oliver Masucci plays the Nazi leader in 'He's Back' ('Er ist wieder da'), a biting social satire by author Timur Vermes which was released in German cinemas this week.

However, it is not his performance, but the reactions of people on the street to 'Hitler' which have got the country talking as it prepares to welcome hundreds of thousands of refugees this year alone. 

More @ Daily Mail

Pope Follows Example Set by Jesus

Via Anita

U.S. colonel: Tapes show Bergdahl joined Taliban

Via avordvet

Image result for U.S. colonel: Tapes show Bergdahl joined Taliban

A retired military colonel, now a Fox News analyst, has dropped a bombshell in the case of Bowe Bergdahl, the U.S. Army sergeant held for five years by the Taliban who is charged with desertion and misbehaving before the enemy.

Retired Col. David Hunt says Bergdahl actually joined the Taliban, and recordings prove it.

Further, he notes the U.S. government has failed to make use of that evidence in the case against Bergdahl, who was returned to the U.S. in a stunning trade for five top terrorists held at Guantanamo.

Appearing on Bill O’Reilly’s Fox News show, Hunt said the Obama administration has tapes proving Bergdahl deserted to the Taliban.

“June 30, 2009, Bergdahl deserts his post in southeast Afghanistan,” he said. “July 1st and 2nd, in a standard briefing to a commander of his unit, Fourth Brigade of the 25th Infantry Division, we have tapes of Taliban talking on Bergdahl’s phone saying that Bergdahl wanted to join them. And we have the Taliban on their own phones talking about Bergdahl trying to join them.”

More @ WND

Black Lives Matter................

Via avordvet

Europe Riots: Mass Outrage Over Mass Immigration

Via David
"MY prediction:

1. Governments will refuse to listen to their people.
2. The media will hector and lecture on how opponents are "racist", "xenophobic", etc.
3. The reaction will grow as more immigrants arrive and create more crime and disruption
4. Skirmishes will start against immigrants; arson, many-on-a-few beatings.
5. The police will obey their political masters and crack down
6. Larger-scale violence will start.

From there, who knows.  But what's clear is this: the native populations are getting VERY unhappy
with the behaviors of their governments.  And increasingly frustrated that their concerns are
being utterly ignored.  This is fertile ground for mass unrest and even low-grade civil wars."

Screen Shot 2015-10-09 at 13.46.10

Hundreds of thousands of self-proclaimed refugees from the Middle East (many of them are actually gold diggers who are coming to Europa in order to live off the government’s dime) have arrived in Europe in recent months. This mass exodus out of especially Syria has been partially fueled by German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s promise that her country would take in all the refugees it had to take in.

The only problem? She got more than she bargained for. Much more. And the same goes for the rest of Europe.

In fact, so many “refugees” have made their way to the Old Continent that West European governments are having a hard time dealing with them. In the Netherlands alone, refugee centers are overwhelmed. As a result, the Dutch government has now announced that many refugees with a residence permit will be moved into normal homes. This means that these newly arrived immigrants will live in houses originally meant for Dutch citizens.

The latter may have been waiting on waiting lists for years, but to no avail; refugees are given priority.

As a result of the exponential growth of refugee centers and the housing issues, the normally complacent Dutch citizens have started to riot. And no, I don’t mean that figuratively: they’re literally blocking roads and even attacking government officials, as happened a few days ago in the small town of Oranje.

More @ PJ Tatler