Saturday, July 2, 2011

How the British Nearly Supported the Confederacy



Was it a civil war twice over? Not only did the “war between the states” divide the American people, it sundered the larger English-speaking community stretching across the Atlantic. The conflict was followed with consuming interest by the British, it affected them directly, many of them fought in it — and it split them into two camps, just as it did the Americans.

Now that Americans are taught that the war was a noble conflict waged by Lincoln and the forces of light against misguided and contumacious Southerners, it’s especially valuable to be reminded that this was far from how all the English saw it at the time. To be sure, almost no Englishman defended slavery, long since abolished in the British Empire. The British edition of “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” had sold an astonishing million copies, three times its American sales, and the Royal Navy waged a long campaign against the slave trade: on his first visit to Downing Street, President Obama was presented with a pen holder carved from the wood of one of the ships that conducted that campaign.

But while some English politicians, like the radical John Bright and the Whig Duke of Argyll, ardently supported the North, plenty sided with the Confederacy. They even included W. E. Gladstone, on his long journey from youthful Tory to “the people’s William,” adored by the masses in his later years. Apart from sympathy with the underdog, many Englishmen believed that the South had a just claim of national self-determination.

MORE.


Via Ann, Belle Grove

NC: A Severe Blow to Economic Recovery



View Image






A Severe Blow to Economic Recovery

In her last batch of vetoes, Governor Beverly Perdue dealt a massive blow to the job-creating businesses that ultimately will lead North Carolina out of a grueling recession.

At 9.7 percent, unemployment in North Carolina remains higher than the national average, and the state’s economy has shed more than 100,000 jobs over the past two years.

Still, on Thursday, the governor vetoed several bills designed to provide certainty for businesses in the private sector. And not so long ago, Perdue claimed to champion several of the issues she rejected.

An indecisive, politically-desperate politician trying to cater to her base, she now stands squarely with fringe environmental groups and liberal special interests in opposing the job-creating sector of our state’s economy.

She tried to hide behind constitutional concerns over the bills, which curiously were never voiced to the General Assembly.

One of the important bills the governor vetoed is SB 709, the Energy Jobs Act.

The Energy Jobs Act directed the governor to begin negotiating a tri-state pact with the governors of Virginia and South Carolina to encourage President Obama to allow offshore energy exploration.

It also directed her to work with North Carolina’s Congressional delegation to advocate for state revenue-sharing for resources off the coast, and directed how that money would be spent. Nearly half of the funds would have gone to jobs training, energy research and conservation.

North Carolina’s offshore energy reserves are thought to be mostly natural gas – the cleanest fossil fuel. The state has 64 million federal offshore acres, the most on the East Coast and the fourth largest acreage in the country.

At a time when North Carolina families and businesses are struggling with outrageous energy costs, Gov. Perdue rejected a golden opportunity to develop affordable and clean energy alternatives that would create thousands of new, good-paying jobs. Once again, she caved to her liberal political allies instead of doing what’s best for our state.

Another of the vetoed bills is SB 781, Regulatory Reform Act.

It’s a common-sense bill that passed the Senate unanimously.

Regulatory Reform clarifies and simplifies some of North Carolina’s confusing and outdated regulations, making it easier for citizens and businesses to attain permits and rely on more predictable guidelines. State agencies have added or changed more than 15,000 rules over the past decade. Those burdensome and confusing regulations are creating uncertainty in the private sector and crippling job-creating businesses.

Among other important improvements, the bill:

· Prohibits any state environmental rules that are more restrictive than federal regulations

· Requires the state to review and eliminate burdensome rules annually

· Gives judges, not agencies, the final say in disputed cases

· Provides more time and opportunity for public input on crafting and changing rules, making the process more transparent

We will keep fighting to reform the bloated bureaucracy Gov. Perdue helped create.

She has now vetoed 15 bills, signaling she’s not serious about working across the aisle or doing what’s best for North Carolina. She’s concerned primarily with one thing: her re-election.

More Promises Kept

An important bill became law without the governor’s signature Friday that will keep cities and town from forcing residents to connect to expensive services and pay higher property taxes.

North Carolina’s annexation laws had not been reformed in more than 50 years, and residents have had enough of municipal governments trouncing on their private property rights.

The Annexation Reform Act is a huge victory for personal freedom and responsibility.

Have a wonderful Independence day weekend.


Phil Berger

President Pro Tempore

2008 Legislative Building

Raleigh, NC 27601-2808

Phone: 919.733.5708

Fax: 919.754.3246

philbe@ncleg.net

"One of the last true Southern gentlemen."

I was posting my weekly Southern pictures when I came across my Cousin Earl's house. I don't have enough for a post yet, but since he just died, I thought I would make a separate post.

The Thin Manse: 1936

1936. Edgecombe County, North Carolina. "J.F. Dozier Farm, Tarboro vicinity." 8x10 inch acetate negative by Frances Benjamin Johnston. View full size.


Here is a picture of him at my family reunion a few years ago sitting. The picture is the final one in this link. His house is across a few fields from mine.

2010 Pippen/Pippin Reunion



EARL LYNN ROBERSON

"One of the last true Southern gentlemen."

The People Must Retain The Right To Shoot

View Image

.... in the event of any unlawful intrusion into their home.

Including an intrusion by alleged police officers.

City police say the two people inside the home had no time to respond. They were sleeping when they heard a loud noise downstairs.

"Three men all identified themselves as Baltimore City police officers. The victims were then tied up and the individuals went through their home," said Det. Jeremy Silbert, city police spokesman.

This is what happens when you legitimate the use of "no-knock" warrants and "dynamic entries" for purposes other than where someone is believed to be holding a hostage or similar circumstance.

I predicted that criminals would soon start dressing up as cops and barging into houses.

Guess what? They are.

There is only one way to stop this: Restoration of the clear common law and in fact individual liberty interest that states that when one is confronted with the use of violence there is no duty to retreat or submit, but one may meet that violence with force, including deadly force.

This means, in blunt language, that if your door is kicked in at 2:00 AM and you are committing no crime you have the legal right to shoot the intruders on the spot. If they turn out to be cops who are "serving a warrant" on the wrong house (by either malfeasance or accident) and they get shot as a consequence that's tough crap for them.

The 4th Amendment reads:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The standard is not "reasonable suspicion." It is probable cause, and