Monday, September 9, 2013

Expecting to Return as a Prisoner of War

 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Alexander_H_Stephens_circa_1875_by_Brady_%26_Co.jpg

Not wanting to return to Congress in 1859 to witness the coming death of the Founders’ Union, Alexander H. Stephens returned Georgia to await predictable political events.  In early February 1865 he met Lincoln aboard the River Queen at Hampton Roads for a last peace conference to end the war. “He offered us nothing but unconditional surrender,” said Stephens on his return, calling the conference “fruitless and inadequate.”
Bernhard Thuersam, Chairman
North Carolina War Between the States Sesquicentennial Commission
"Unsurpassed Valor, Courage and Devotion to Liberty"
"The Official Website of the North Carolina WBTS Sesquicentennial"

Expecting to Return as a Prisoner of War

“The [Cincinnati] speech was intended as a solemn warning not only to his constituents and people of the South, but the whole country, that in his opinion the peace and prosperity of the country depended upon a strict and inflexible adherence to the principles of the adjustment measures of 1850 upon the subject of slavery, as carried out and expressed in the Democratic Baltimore platform of 1852, with the additional plank inserted in the Cincinnati Convention of 1856. 

It was well known then that Mr. Stephens had serious apprehensions that those principles would be departed from in the next Democratic Convention to be held in Charleston the following year. It was also known that he did not finally determine to withdraw from Congress until after a personal interview with Mr. [James] Buchanan, in which he had urged the President to cease his warfare against Mr. [Stephen] Douglas, and the support of the paper known as his organ in Washington in insisting upon the insertion of a new plank in the next Convention, asserting it to be the duty of Congress to pass acts to protect slavery in the Territories, and not to leave that subject, as the Cincinnati platform had done, with the people of the Territories. 

Mr. Stephens most urgently urged the President that if he continued to pursue the line of policy he was then following there would be a burst-up at Charleston, and with that burst-up of the Union – temporary or permanent – “as certainly as he would break his neck if he sprang from that window” [of the reception-room at the White house, in which they were conversing] “or as the sun would set that night.” 

Mr. Buchanan seemed surprised at this opinion, but was unshaken in his determination to adhere to the policy he was then following. Mr. Stephens, in taking leave, told the President that his object in seeking the interview was to know if his purpose was as stated, and if that was so, his own intention was, not to be allowed to return to the next Congress.

He had spent sixteen years of life in striving to maintain the Union upon the principles of the Constitution; this he thought could be done for many years to come upon the principles set forth in the Cincinnati platform. The Government administered on these principles he thought the best in the world; but if it was departed from, he saw nothing but ruin ahead.  He did not wish to be in at the death; but if disunion should come in consequence of this departure, he should go with the people of his own State.

Another fact connected with the retirement of Mr. Stephens from Congress may be noted here. When leaving Washington, with a number of other Southern members, on the beautiful morning of the 5th of March, 1859, he stood at the stern of the boat for some minutes, gazing back at the Capitol, when [someone] jocularly said, “I suppose you are thinking of coming back to those halls as a Senator.” 

Mr. Stephens replied, with some emotion, “No; I never expect to see Washington again, unless I am brought here as a prisoner of war.”  This was literally fulfilled in the latter part of October 1865, when he passed through Washington on his way to his home as a paroled prisoner from Fort Warren.” 

(Life of Alexander H. Stephens, R.M. Johnston & W.H. Browne, J.B. Lippincott & Company, 1883, pp. 347- 348)

Shanghai 1949

 

More @ panzer_papa

I Don't Reload

Via grossfater_m

Reprisal threats on U.S. interests grow louder

http://www.habilian.ir/en/images/stories/arabic/wathiq%20al-battat-%20head%20of%20mukhtar%20army.jpg

Strategic consequence of military strike 'destined for ultimate failure'

As the Obama administration considers bombing Syria’s capability to launch chemical-weapons attacks, various Middle East groups beyond Syria are speaking out, threatening reprisals against U.S. interests should Washington order an attack.

Such reprisals, in fact, could occur anywhere there are U.S. assets, including Iraq.

Sheikh Watiq al-Battat, leader of Iraq’s Jaysh al-Mukhtar, or Al-Mukhtar army, has vowed to target U.S. interests in Iraq and the Persian Gulf region using what he describes as “thousands of martyrdom-seeking operations.”

Al-Battat said that he has some 23,000 “fully trained and equipped martyrdom-seeking forces” whom he said “can blow (up) U.S. interests in Iraq and the Persian Gulf at any time if the U.S. commits such a stupid act.”

The U.S., he added, will not be “immune from martyrdom-seeking operations” of his fighters.

More @ WND

And now it's global COOLING! Record return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 60% in a year

Via Daily Timewaster

 global cooling

A chilly Arctic summer has left nearly a million more square miles of ocean covered with ice than at the same time last year – an increase of 60 per cent.

The rebound from 2012’s record low comes six years after the BBC reported that global warming would leave the Arctic ice-free in summer by 2013.

Instead, days before the annual autumn re-freeze is due to begin, an unbroken ice sheet more than half the size of Europe already stretches from the Canadian islands to Russia’s northern shores.

More @ Daily Mail

Poll: Majority Of Americans Approve Of Sending Congress To Syria

Via Doug

 

I bet an actual poll would prove the same. :)

As President Obama continues to push for a plan of limited military intervention in Syria, a new poll of Americans has found that though the nation remains wary over the prospect of becoming involved in another Middle Eastern war, the vast majority of U.S. citizens strongly approve of sending Congress to Syria.

More @ The Onion

Gun owners have vested interest in opposing U.S. Syrian intervention

Via Adam

 Susan Rice, John McCain, Barack Obama and Lindsey Graham agree on who is going to pay for their imperial ambitions with blood, treasure and erosion of freedoms -- us.

Den of Traitors

As the administration beats the war drums and works on a plan to share the blame by growing domestic and international support for the initiation of military force against Syria, the focus of those reporting on developments, and thus, those they are reporting them to, has been on everything but the likelihood of retaliation on American soil. Ditto for the government’s likely domestic response should that happen.

Noting how two pressure cooker bombs at the Boston Marathon put large swaths of the city under what was effectively martial law, with innocent citizens being rousted from their homes by the equivalent of an occupation army, it’s not hard to envision a similar reaction an order of magnitude larger.

More @ Examiner

Million Muslim March

Via Adam


Kushnapup stock for Saiga 12

 

Bicycle powered tree house elevator

Via Daily Timewaster