Sons of Confederate Veterans Mechanized Cavalry

Whitehall Memorial Park Dedication Service

********

Welcome to the official SCV Mechanized Cavalry website. We have formed this special interest group of SCV members who like to ride motorcycles to assist in the Charge of the SCV and hope you will give thoughtful consideration in "Jining the Cavalry". We attend all the usual biker rides, as well as, those specifically dealing with the War Between the States and History in General.

The bond we all share as descendants of the most noble warriors this Nation has produced cannot be bought or replicated and as such this makes the Mechanized Cavalry a unique group in itself. If I may be of any assistance feel free to E-Mail me.

Ride as you would with Forrest!

Kevin Stone
Colonel SCV Mechanized Cavalry,
Commanding

More @ The Mechanized Cavalry

Paul Supporters: Why Our Political Future Is In the GOP by Ron Holland

So What is the Future for Liberty in Our Closed Political Monopoly?

Let's take over the GOP from the inside rather than fight them in a rigged election process where third-party candidates are hidden by a news blackout enforced by both parties and the main street news media. For example, how many times have the national LP candidates been in a debate with the candidates of the GOP or Democrats? Contrast this with Paul's repeated debate inclusion during the 2012 primary season.

Americans historically do not vote for third-party presidential candidates in the general election. At the end of this election will we be remembered and feared as a 15% voting block that is taking over the GOP one county at a time from the good ol' boy establishment or do we fall for the third-party attraction and receive a meaningless one time few percent of the national vote in November?

Our one chance for ultimate victory is to take advantage of the GOP party rules used for years to rally conservative and free-market voters at election time. Of course, they then dismiss us after election day until the next siren call for voters to support a GOP with less government rhetoric but, in fact, almost a mirror image of the socialist Democrats. Like the unions and liberal voting blocks of the Democrats, we are considered little more than voting cannon fodder to be used at election time.

In my opinion, a rush to the Libertarian Party or another third party if Ron Paul doesn't win the GOP presidential nomination is a big mistake that could dramatically weaken the power and cripple the future viability of his liberty movement. I personally will not even consider voting for Romney unless he picks Ron or Rand Paul as his VP candidate, and if it is Rand, Ron is offered a top cabinet position as Secretary of the Treasury etc.

Note, I'm certainly not urging Paul supporters to support a Romney/Paul ticket; rather, I'm keeping my options open in order to provide the maximum leverage to Paul forces at the convention by categorically stating, "No Paul = No Vote For the Republican Ticket in November."

Second, no meaningless gestures like a prime convention-speaking slot or influence over the party platform will buy my support. I suggest you do the same until after the GOP convention, and then let your conscience be your guide.

Both Political Party Leaderships are Controlled by Special Interests

More at The Daily Bell

Counterpoint

Nail Your Colours To The Mast
VERBATIM POST

Posted with permission from Warlock Sundance as a response to my article Citizen's Police Academy Part 4.

I wish you would not fall for such tripe guys. I ride with the Warlocks MC in South Carolina. http://warlocksmccolumbia.net

The hell of it is.....I am not and my brothers are not the bad guys you are looking out for. Yes, one percenters we are, but the meaning of that is not what you posted or are being told. I will just put it out here for ya.

I am a born again believer in Jesus Christ..... and I ride in an outlaw motorcycle club. I am a husband, father, grandfather,friend, property owner, homeowner, business owner, and taxpayer.....but I live outside the norms of regular folks. I have long hair, I am sleeved both arm tattoos. I do not drink. I do not do drugs.
I own four Harley Davidson's, and ride them regularly, rain or shine, hot or cold....it is who and what I am......and guess what.....I am a prepper too.

My business???? I own and operate a CNC machinery service company. I service and repair Laser's, pressbrakes, turret punch presses, shears, plasma cutters.....etc. I also have a full time job because the economy is killing my business here lately. I an electro/mechanical engineer.

Look guys, I have worked hard and all my life for what I have. I know the value of it. Contrary to popular belief, as espoused by L.E. training seminars and such.....damn near every biker I know will stand side by side with YOU to protect YOU in your time of need, come what may in the future.

Never forget....A helluva lot of us miserable outlaw bikers are VETERANS who served this country as well.

We are not the enemy.

mmasse

Restore Parental Rights With Child Abortion Notification

On Tuesday, March 27, there was a House Judiciary Committee meeting that produced these statements from Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.): “Some parents are violent. Some parents are rapists.” In consequence, Nadler believes a new bill that requires parental notification for minor females who cross state lines to secure an abortion is “fundamentally flawed,” because it assumes that parents have their children’s best interests at heart. This is an old argument routinely used by the state to usurp the parental role, and it has been thoroughly refuted by The New American’s William F. Jasper in the article linked to in this sentence. In a testy exchange with Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) Rep. Nadler also said “We’re not dealing with human beings at this point.” Nadler needs to know that there are bypass laws on the books to protect minors in hard cases involving abuse or neglect.

Also at the committee meeting Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) tried in vain to create an exemption that would allow grandparents or older siblings to take minors across state lines for abortions in lieu of parents, but that failed. In her plea she stated “Doctors, not congress members, should be the judge when it comes to deciding the best care for women.” (Yes, she voted for ObamaCare.) She cited “medical emergencies” in minors as the reason for her concern, another old refuted argument.

For the first half of the 20th century, it was well recognized and supported by U.S. court cases that parents have complete authority -- God-given -- over their children. It wasn’t until the latter half of that modern century up to the present time that we have seen representatives in government uninvitedly assuming parental roles. The strong tone of objections to something as simple as the Child Interstate Abortion Nullification Act, H.R. 2299, is proof positive that it’s vitally needed legislation.

House Resolution 2299 would make it illegal to transport a minor across a State line with the intent that such a minor obtain an abortion without parental notification. This bill also would make it illegal, and punishable, to circumvent the over 30 state-level laws currently in place that require abortion notification for parents of minors by transporting a minor across a State line. These laws are in place to protect minor children. Abortion is not a simple ear-piercing, nor does it have the effect of an aspirin, both actions that need parental approval in certain situations. Abortion is a potentially dangerous medical procedure, whether it be a surgical or chemical abortion, with life-long emotional and psychological consequences.

If a minor was assaulted, raped, sexually abused, etc., surely our representatives in Congress would acknowledge that parents have a right to know about such situations. Without this bill male predators who use secret abortions to cover up their heinous crimes with minor girls would be protected, as would the huge profits of blood money that abortion providers continue to collect for the killing of the unborn.

Some of the bill’s summarized provisions are:

Amends the federal criminal code to prohibit transporting a minor child across a state line to obtain an abortion with the intent to evade the right of a parent under any law in the minor’s state of residence that requires parental involvement in the minor’s abortion decision. Makes an exception for an abortion necessary to save the life of the minor.
Imposes a fine and/or prison term of up to one year on a physician who performs or induces an abortion on an out-of-state minor in violation of the parental notification requirements in this bill. Requires such physician to give 24-hour actual or constructive notice to a parent of the minor seeking an abortion, subject to certain exceptions.

In essence, anyone who objects to this bill supports the ongoing law-breaking that is carried out by many who intentionally cross state lines from a parental-notification state to one that is not.

The Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act protects the fundamental rights of parents. With 161 cosponsors, it has a more than a fair chance of being passed in the House. The Senate has a companion bill, S. 1241 with 32 cosponsors. Contact your Representatives and Senators today on this vital bill that has already been reported out of the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

Thanks.

Your Friends at The John Birch Society

Afterburner with Bill Whittle: Generations

This comment below was so startling, I thought I should post it here

So well said! I was an instructor at the Navy Test Pilot School, two tours in flight test, runner up for astronaut, and three engineering degrees, and flew 50 different aircraft, mostly fighters. When I tried to teach high school, I was told I was not qualified; that I would have to go back to school for two years, then 'intern' (work for free) for one before I could teach. Yet most of the local teachers couldn't even spell! I knew we were doomed then.

Unfortunately America’s courts are corrupt.

Update on Eligibility Challenges

Liberty Legal Foundation is still litigating three eligibility challenges in our attempt to confirm the Constitutional qualifications for the Office of President. We filed a Federal lawsuit in Arizona Federal Court, a state lawsuit in Tennessee state Court, and a state ballot challenge in Georgia.

You may remember that a hearing was held in the Georgia ballot challenge last January, and the Georgia administrative court dismissed our challenge finding that Obama is a natural born citizen. LLF appealed to the Georgia Superior Court, and when that court dismissed our appeal we filed a petition for appeal with the Supreme Court of Georgia. Earlier this month the Supreme Court of Georgia denied our petition for appeal. We are now preparing a petition for appeal to be filed directly with the U.S. Supreme Court.

You may also remember that LLF’s Georgia ballot challenge was the first and only litigation to date that got a ruling on the merits from a court on the question of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to serve as President. The Georgia administrative Court’s ruling was stunningly wrong, but it did address the issue of what “natural born citizen” means under Article II of our Constitution. The fact that the Georgia court’s ruling was not a procedural dismissal leaves us hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will agree to review this ruling.

Our Tennessee and Arizona cases are different from the Georgia case for several reasons. The biggest difference is the named defendants. In Georgia, Barack Obama was the named defendant. In our Tennessee and Arizona lawsuits we specifically avoided naming Mr. Obama directly. We also did not name any Secretary of State or any other government officials. By avoiding direct claims against any governmental officials or agencies we avoid governmental immunities, special government-favoring procedural rules, and government-paid lawyers. Our focus in these cases is the Democratic National Committee and the state-level Democratic organizations that intend to continue to defraud the American people with an unconstitutional candidate. These political party organizations are not part of the government. So, they should be easier to sue.

More @ Liberty Legal

The World of Lost Smartphones

Courtesy of: Background Check Blog

Ogletree: I Want 'First White Victim' from Stand Your Ground

Ignoramus. Stand Your Ground doesn't apply in this case.

Via Breitbart

#OWS American Spring Agitprop: The Lynch the NYPD Edition

LANGUAGE

The rise of the black Klan

Black supremacy is on the march. It is a poison that is spreading across our society, meeting little to no resistance. This must change. Otherwise, America will confront the real prospect of racial conflict.

The New Black Panthers are the tip of the spear. They champion black supremacy, hatred of whites, and militant Islam. They are the black version of the Ku Klux Klan — bigoted thugs who practice vigilantism and mob rule. They placed a $10,000 bounty for the capture of George Zimmerman — “dead or alive” — for the killing of Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old black teenager. Their actions threaten the rule of law. Placing bounties on people’s heads is an invitation to lawlessness and murder. It has no place in a civilized society.

Recently, on their radio show. the New Black Panthers called for a race war. In an April 6 broadcast, Chawn Kweli, the party’s national spokesman, said that “true revolution means some bloodshed.” In particular, he championed the racial cleansing of American whites.

“And there are those who wish they could stand in this hour, to see the destruction of the devil’s world and the devil’s society …” Mr. Kweli said. “I’m talking about that blond-haired, blue-eyed, sometimes brown-eyed Caucasian walking around with a mind-set, a demonistic mind-set, and a nature to do evil and brutality.”

On that same broadcast, the Panthers’ chief of staff, Michelle Williams, demanded that blood be spilled for Trayvon’s shooting. “Let me tell you, the things that’s about to happen, to these honkeys, these crackers, these pigs, these pink people, these ---- people,” she said in an interview. “It has been long overdue.”

More @ The Washington Times