Dixie's reply when I told her she should finish her project and I replied, continue on until you get them straightened out, honey!:)
Monday, November 5, 2012
"But I'm in the middle of a political conversation!"
Dixie's reply when I told her she should finish her project and I replied, continue on until you get them straightened out, honey!:)
Elections of deception
VERBATIM
The Federal Reserve authorizes the printing of endless fiat currencies without any supervision of government. The bank controls the government. The government, desperate for growth, strides to collect more revenue (a code word for taxes) in order to perpetuate it own self. They work well together. The politicians of both parties are in on the game and play musical chairs trading off power and gravitas within the kabuki dance of an admiring and complicit media.
Now if one were to take a look at the electoral map as guaranteed by the founders, it would find that the old Southern Confederacy today controls only 200 votes if Maryland is included (she has 10). Obviously, no one would consider Maryland a ”red” State. If adding to the Southern States the Western States were added which comprise 53 votes (Arizona at 11) the “confederacy” of those two regions would not exceed 253. In that event someone would have to secure either Ohio or a combination of Wisconsin and Indiana in order to win the election.
The vote for political direction in America has seldom changed since 1865. Northeastern States supported by the left coast has- and always will -select the President. The South and West are placated to, but do not have much more than tie braking ability. The lives and fate of these constituencies are typically determined by others whose values and lifestyles are quite opposite.
America today is red states and blue states. Once the word state was State. There was a time when we were a united States and not the current United States. We were a union of States now we are a Union of states. The emphasis on a document’s capitalization has consequences and students who wish not to learn the basics of governmental formation also suffer from the basic defect that we were constructed and founded as a nation of thirteen States as opposed to a Nation of one State. The differences are subtle to many but impossible to others. The difference, if even realized, is the seed which allows liberty to prosper, spirituality to flourish and righteousness to govern.
The real deception is in believing that victory of either party will modify the collision coarse America is on with disaster. Washington based politicians, which are power mongering fools, are sin-ominous with evil as they all spin webs of deceit to convince simple minded people of their nefarious purposes.
The red States of the South and West can never control their own destiny as long as the current system prevails. The Constitution was to provide for Liberty at the human level, yet Government now controls how those red States shall be forever governed.
Kevin Carroll,
Southern Republic
Giuliani Slams Obama's Superstorm Response: 'Bad as Katrina'
Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani blamed President Obama for the seeming absence of FEMA in Manhattan, Staten Island and on Long Island, among other parts of New York’s downstate region that continue to reel from the effects of Hurricane Sandy.
Giuliani’s comments come as criticism of the way current Mayor Michael Bloomberg has handled the emergency response has grown significantly in recent days, according to The Daily Beast.
“The president getting all this credit so early, maybe the first day or two he was paying attention, but the minute he got his credit, the minute he got his pat on his back, we had the same situation as we had in Benghazi,” Giuliani told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” on Monday. “He loses focus. He goes back to being campaigner-in-chief rather than commander-in-chief.”
More @ Newsmax
A Noble Manner
A post-election view of America might be very different from the norm. Traditionally, the election settles everything. Even the losers have to accept defeat and work hard to elect someone better next time. This president, however, has not been the President in any real terms, he has been a dictator, using the majorities he had in congress when he had the House and the Executive Order when he no longer controlled both houses.
Obama is the only president I ever heard use the pronoun "I" so many times when describing actions that could only be done by many, many people. "I got Bin Laden" is a favorite one at election time, but there is always the sense that there has been a hidden secret; some deal cut between the Muslims and himself, assuming for a moment that he is not one, which under Islamic culture would suggest that if his father was a Muslim, then he is as well, no matter what church he had to go to in order to become part of the American political scene. The fact that the church he chose was an American-hating Black Evolution church might say something to the compromise he had to make.
Think for a moment though about the October Surprise he might have planned for November 6th.
More @ TL In Exile
Troops in the Streets
Via WRSA
Every now and then an email comes my way warning about the day when the government unleashes the military against its own citizens. This day isn't likely to come because for one thing the current regime is not particularly fond of the military.
The Obama Administration isn't inflicting massive cuts on the military, cutting their health care and pushing veteran officers out the door because it likes the military as an institution. It doesn't. And it won't until it remakes it into a fully politically correct institution dedicated to promoting tolerance and fighting global warming. Progress has been made on that front, the Navy is cutting ships and spending money on Green Energy. The Marines are celebrating gay marriage. Any day now the Air Force will be announcing its first wheelchair pilot. But it's still a poor fit with the culture of the left.
If Obama has to have any kind of military, he prefers the kind where young men with college degrees sit in a room, push buttons and kill people thousands of miles away from remotely controlled aircraft. That kind of military is a closer cultural fit with a campaign that is in love with technocratic solutions and always looking for shortcuts to avoid the dangerous and dirty hard work that has to be done. It's also much less dangerous.
Unleashing the military on a civilian population carries a price. Once you call out the troops to protect your regime, one of two things happen. Either the troops don't do it and your government is done. Or they do it and your regime now lives or dies by the support of the military. Within the last few years the use of the military in Egypt and Iran turned generals into the arbiters of political succession. To the left, the idea of the people they despise deciding who should run the country and how is their biggest nightmare. It is one reason that we still have a democracy.
Every now and then an email comes my way warning about the day when the government unleashes the military against its own citizens. This day isn't likely to come because for one thing the current regime is not particularly fond of the military.
The Obama Administration isn't inflicting massive cuts on the military, cutting their health care and pushing veteran officers out the door because it likes the military as an institution. It doesn't. And it won't until it remakes it into a fully politically correct institution dedicated to promoting tolerance and fighting global warming. Progress has been made on that front, the Navy is cutting ships and spending money on Green Energy. The Marines are celebrating gay marriage. Any day now the Air Force will be announcing its first wheelchair pilot. But it's still a poor fit with the culture of the left.
If Obama has to have any kind of military, he prefers the kind where young men with college degrees sit in a room, push buttons and kill people thousands of miles away from remotely controlled aircraft. That kind of military is a closer cultural fit with a campaign that is in love with technocratic solutions and always looking for shortcuts to avoid the dangerous and dirty hard work that has to be done. It's also much less dangerous.
Unleashing the military on a civilian population carries a price. Once you call out the troops to protect your regime, one of two things happen. Either the troops don't do it and your government is done. Or they do it and your regime now lives or dies by the support of the military. Within the last few years the use of the military in Egypt and Iran turned generals into the arbiters of political succession. To the left, the idea of the people they despise deciding who should run the country and how is their biggest nightmare. It is one reason that we still have a democracy.
More @ Sultan Knish
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)