Monday, December 24, 2012

Feinstein's 'assault weapon' ban would be tantamount to confiscation

Via WRSA

Good luck on that.  Are you coming to take our weapons, useful idiot?

 Sen. Feinstein would ban them because they can be "bump fired" 

When Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced her intention to introduce a bill banning so-called "assault weapons" on the first day of the 113th Congress next month, the implication was that it would work much like her previous handiwork, the 1994-2004 federal AWB, in that firearms and magazines manufactured before the effective date of the ban would remain legal, and not restricted more oppressively than other firearms. In other words, her legislation would have a "grandfather clause" (although the protection provided by such a clause is often far less than one might expect).

She gave this impression on NBC News (quoted in the Huffington Post):
"It will ban the sale, the transfer, the importation and the possession, not retroactively, but prospectively," and ban the sale of clips of more than ten bullets, Feinstein said.
The "not retroactively" wording would seem to imply that firearms already in private hands would not be subject to the new restrictions.

In a press conference last Friday with Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), however, she painted a far different picture. In this short C-SPAN video clip (which cannot be embedded in Examiner articles), she spills some previously unreleased details about her proposed legislation. She explains that all existing "assault weapons" would be--just as machine guns are currently--put under National Firearms Act (NFA) regulation, with all the legal hoops such regulation entails.

More @ Examiner


10 comments:

  1. I do not have the Christmas spirt tonight, maybe tomorrow.
    In summary,
    BRING IN ON, BITCH.
    Terry

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope she's the one knocking on my door asking for them, I'll happily give em to that cranky bitch ......Lead first....

    ReplyDelete
  3. That Fucking whore along with Bloomberg and the rest will not be happy until we are defenseless! Well guess what Bitch WE WILL not be Made defenseless by any of you or Your Bullshit bills or OBAMMERS EX Orders The Constitution is Literal. It is the Law of the Land. God and the Real Govt give me the right to defend myself.Lady you folks are about to either A. Make a lot of honest folks criminals. B. Start the Civil war. We will not Surrender!!! Your Call... Sorry for the language Brock but this burns me up!

    China
    III

    ReplyDelete
  4. She is now advocating a mandatory buy-back program.

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/sen.-feinstein-suggests-national-buyback-of-guns/article/2516648#.UNk4YlHhfgI

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't know how I missed this and posted. Clinton is on board. I guess he doesn't remember what happened in the 1994 elections after his gun ban and even he attributed the Democratic loss to precisely that.

      Delete
  5. They don't have enough of their worthless FRN's to purchase my guns.If they have pure gold,nope not selling.Another name that goes to the Top of the TRAITOR list! Warning to Traitors WE will not forget!

    China
    III

    ReplyDelete