This is worthwhile.
==================
I am guilty of falling into the “Wolverines!” mindset from time-to-time, that being the image of going toe-to-toe with the insidious foreign invasion force and setting up ambushes to destroy the evil occupiers or perhaps having to confront droves of hostiles, be they urban gang-bangers, local looters, or some other such group of less than savory individuals. The modern survivalist seems to be rather obsessed with the idea of a total collapse of all centralized authority to the point where society is little better than Somalia, although historical precedent doesn’t give much credibility to this theory. The idea of a “total collapse” has been covered to the point of ad nauseam but what of the idea of a “partial” or “limited” collapse? If you have prepared for a total collapse and your entire mindset, mentality, and preparations are focused on that, what if the collapse is less than total? What if instead of a nuclear war there is simply an increase in violent crime by 500 percent or even 1,000 percent due to a serious weakening of government power and authority, short of a total collapse of central authority. Are you prepared to live in an America that is incredibly more dangerous than it presently is but where you don’t have a green-light to don the tactical armor and take out your battle rifle to clean the streets?
if the crime rate rises over 400%, isn't the plan to make Manhattan Island the nation's only maximum security federal penitentiary?
ReplyDeleteLimited collapse to me simply means that there are fewer heads on the hydra and more (infrastructure, resources) still left that's worth defending. Be prepared to become, or at the very least "influence" your local politicians and law enforcement.
I hadn't heard about Manhattan and I have no intention of going near the area. I'm in a very small town now, but being between two military bases may not be ideal. Could end up "out on the farm."
ReplyDelete