Thursday, September 22, 2011

GOA Alert: Rep. Paul Broun Introduces Concealed Carry Recognition Bill

Pro-gun champion Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) recently introduced a concealed carry recognition bill, H.R. 2900, that allows law-abiding citizens who can legally carry concealed in their home state to carry all across the country, as well.

Titled “The Secure Access to Firearms Enhancement (SAFE) Act,” this legislation recognizes that constitutional rights do not become null and void at the state line.

And, most importantly, Rep. Broun’s bill is “constitutional carry” friendly. The SAFE Act recognizes that while CCW permits are the “norm” in most states, constitutional carry is the ideal.

For more than twenty years, Gun Owners of America has pushed constitutional carry (also known as Vermont-style carry) at the state level. Such legislation recognizes the right to carry without having to first get the government's permission.

After all, how much of a right is protected by the Second Amendment if citizens must first pass tests, fill out applications, take classes and, in many cases, be fingerprinted and photographed to obtain a license—in essence, to prove to the authorities that they're not criminals before being allowed to carry?

Vermont had it right for over a century. Any person can carry a concealed firearm—whether they are a resident of the state or not—except for use in the commission of a crime. That’s it. No registration, no paperwork, no arbitrary denials by anti-gun bureaucrats.

And the result? Vermont consistently ranks among the safest states in the country.

And other states are finally starting to follow suit. Three states (Alaska, Arizona, and Wyoming) have passed constitutional carry laws for their own citizens. Texas passed a modified version, allowing for a concealed firearm anywhere inside one’s vehicle, including motor homes. And since 1991, constitutional carry has been allowed in more than 99% of the state of Montana.

Even with these improvements, however, reciprocal agreements between states are written in such a way that an actual permit is still required in order to carry concealed from state to state.

And in many instances, there is NO way to legally carry concealed in another state.

Rep. Broun’s bill addresses this issue in a way that respects the Constitution and in a way that recognizes the unalienable right to defend one’s life—without needing a permit from the government.

Just as GOA works to eliminate government restrictions on carry at the state level, GOA has never supported a bill at the national level that stops short of recognizing constitutional carry.

After all, a bill that requires states to implement a permitting system risks setting back the efforts of the many states seeking to pass real concealed carry reform.

The SAFE Act also respects the Constitution and states’ powers in that it does NOT establish national standards for concealed carry, nor does it provide for a national carry permit or require a state like Vermont to move to a permit system (in order for its citizens to carry out-of-state).

In fact, the Broun bill will do nothing to change what the states already do in terms of allowing or denying their citizens their right to carry firearms. This bill simply allows citizens who are able to carry in their home state, to also carry in every other state that allows concealed carry.

Another important distinction is that Rep. Broun’s bill, unlike other legislation being debated in Congress, does not rely on an expansive, erroneous interpretation of the Commerce Clause. The SAFE Act instead recognizes the “full faith and credit” protection that is guaranteed in Article IV of the Constitution.

Constitutionally-protected rights, including the right to self-defense, do not disappear at the state line. Rep. Broun’s SAFE Act will simply allow lawful gun owners who have the right carry concealed firearms in their home state to also carry in other states.

ACTION: Please contact your Representative and urge him or her to cosponsor Rep. Broun’s SAFE Act.

Click Here to Send Your Representative a prewritten email message

Click Here to assist GOA financially in protecting gun rights

5 comments:

  1. Legally carry? Last I looked, there were no qualifiers in the 2nd.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I still don't like it.

    More Federal power.

    Further, it would empower visitors to MY state to carry while I am still barred by state law, and not give ME the same right when I go to THEIR state.

    The SOLUTION is Constitutional Carry AS PER THE FRIGGING CONSTITUTION!

    SHALL
    NOT
    BE
    INFRINGED!
    PERIOD!

    ReplyDelete
  3. visitors to MY state to carry while I am still barred by state law,

    I don't get it. I would think they would be restricted to your state's laws. At any rate, it makes absolutely no sense to me, that I can CCW everywhere in NC, but libraries schools, etcetera. What difference does it make? Jerry Lee just came on 107.9.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did you read what you posted?

    The bill says "if you can carry in your home-state, you can carry in all others.

    My state is technically "may issue" but in reality I'll never get a permit, as they're restricted mostly to the rich and connected.

    If this bill passed, any visitor with a permit or from a "Constitutional Carry" state would be allowed to carry IN MY STATE where I am not.

    If I visit THEIR state, I STILL cannot carry since I am banned at home.

    Capisce?

    ReplyDelete