*******
I wonder what purpose the public schools serve,
other than to warehouse children while their parents work or watch
television. They certainly don’t teach much, as survey after survey
shows. Is there any particular reason for having them? Apart from
their baby-sitting function, I mean.Schooling, sez me, should be adapted to the needs and capacities of those being schooled. For unintelligent children, the study of anything beyond minimal reading is a waste of time, since they will learn little or nothing more. For the intelligent, a public schooling is equivalent to tying an anchor to a student swimmer. The schools are an impediment to learning, a torture of the bright, and a form of negligent homicide against a country that needs trained minds in a competitive world.
Let us start with the truly stupid. Millions of children graduate—“graduate”—from high school—“high school”—unable to read. Why inflict twelve years of misery on them? It is not reasonable to blame them for being witless, but neither does it make sense to pretend that they are not. For them school is custodial, nothing more. Since there is little they can do in a technological society, they will remain in custody all
More @ Fred's
It's worse than Fred knows - and has been for a long, long time...
ReplyDeleteI posted a true story about this on my blog...
DD