On last Saturday’s broadcast of The Political Cesspool Radio Program, we welcomed Congressman Walter Jones (R-NC) as a guest on the show, and the lupine lunatic left’s Pavlovian saliva pumps are slowly coming up to speed.
This time, the attack was begun by the website of Mother Jones Magazine (no relation to Congressman Jones), a Socialist rag that has been home for editors, journalists, and other questionable characters that you won’t find at Baptist or Presbyterian Sunday services.
The article’s author begins his spaghetti-throwing with the usual stock phrases: “notorious white nationalist radio program,” “ardent white nationalists James Edwards and Eddie Miller” [note to Mother Jones: that’s Eddie “The Bombardier” Miller; smile when you say it or write it], “racist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic,” “avowed white nationalist,” etc. The author then renders due obeisance to the $PLC and the ADL (the unrivaled leaders of the hate industry in America), even reprinting the $PLC’s stale tripe from 2007 about James and the show.
The article also features a few points from our Statement of Principles, specifically:
“We represent a philosophy that is pro-White and are against political centralization.”
What’s wrong with being pro-White? The AIPAC is pro-Jew; the NAACP is pro-black; LaRaza is pro-Mestizo. No one has ever articulated a rational argument as to why White people can’t be pro-White.
“We wish to revive the White birthrate above replacement level fertility and beyond to grow the percentage of Whites in the world relative to other races.”
What’s wrong with wanting to increase our birthrate? Jews want to increase the Jewish birthrate; blacks want to increase the black birthrate; and Mestizos are counting on, even demanding an ever-increasing Mestizo birthrate to increase their political influence in the U.S. That’s natural and healthy. If Mother Jones thinks it’s bad for us to want to increase the White birthrate, then it has to be because they want the White birthrate to decrease. There’s a word for wanting to decrease a race’s birthrate – it’s “genocide.”
“Secession is a right of all people and individuals. It was successful in 1776 and this show honors those who tried to make it successful in 1865.”
The United States is the product of secession. That Abraham Lincoln waged a successful war against the South does not negate the virtue of secession, any more than a rape negates honorable womanhood. The threat of secession would be a powerful check on the political centralization that we oppose – the same political centralization our Revolutionary and Confederate sires opposed. Political centralization is the foundation of socialism, which is what Mother Jones Magazine supports.
More @ The Political Cesspool
"The United States is the product of secession. That Abraham Lincoln waged a successful war against the South does not negate the virtue of secession, any more than a rape negates honorable womanhood. The threat of secession would be a powerful check on the political centralization that we oppose – the same political centralization our Revolutionary and Confederate sires opposed."
ReplyDeleteI do not believe that threatening secession will change anything. The would be State of Jefferson in Southern Washington and Northern Oregon has been threatening it since I believe about 1940. Some state must secede. Will it be Vermont or a Southern State? If not now, when?
The sooner the better, that's for sure.
Delete